A Complete Waste of Space

callmeslick wrote:

CUDA wrote:GTFO it.

What does it matter.

Hater.

I deputized CUDA during my fishing trip.......the winky was his touch, but the words echo my exact thoughts.

" I shot the Sheriff...but, I did not shoot his Deputy "

You don't have exact thoughts, you have baseless, fact less innuendo which you
present....much like a monkey does his turd. Though, R_D finds it amusing.
Kudos though, you have become transparent/visible.

Clinton’s Candidacy May Ride on Benghazi

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/05 ... -benghazi/

How do you hide a turd in a cat box?
You cover it with four dead Americans.

Why?
Because nobody will ever see, smell or know about the turd.

But, what about the bodies, won't they be discovered?
Yes, they will, eventually. However, the turd will be long gone, by then.

Pudfark wrote:You don't have exact thoughts, you have baseless, fact less innuendo which you
present....much like a monkey does his turd. Though, R_D finds it amusing.

I suspect R_D likes monkey turd too.

Nic

Here's a little more from the "Monkey"/"State Dept." it'self.

STATE DEPT CONTINUES TO HIDE IDENTITIES OF BENGHAZI SURVIVORS FROM CONGRESS

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2013 ... m-Congress

R_D should have a "ball" with this...

Here's where it gets "messy".....

SOURCE: ONLY PRESIDENT COULD HAVE MADE 'STAND DOWN' CALL ON BENGHAZI

A source with intimate information about the events that happened on the ground in Benghazi the night the U.S. Consulate and the CIA annex was attacked by terrorists told Breitbart News that, ultimately, only the President of the United States, or someone acting on his authority, could have prevented Special Forces either on the ground or nearby from helping those Americans who were under deadly assault.

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2013 ... azi-Attack

in the words of the committee chair:"we don't have a smoking gun here, we likely don't even have a warm slingshot....."












carry on, it's hilarious the rantings of the goofy extreme right wingers.

I was gonna belittle ya, some more, Slick....
Not necessary...you did a good enough job of it yourself.

Big difference between a "Truth Seeker" and a "Lie Speaker"...ya think?

Since the beginning of "Benghazi", neither the POTUS or the Speaker of the House
have told the "truth". Everything, but the truth. Now, they seem to be "SOL".

What strikes me as amusing?
All ya have to do is look back 5 years......
To see, when it comes to Obama, the only thing he cares about?
His reputation and legacy. It's all in the "shitter" now.

Here's some "asking points"?

1. Two "stand-down" orders were given while the Benghazi attacks were in progress.

2. The "protest" about a YouTube video was a complete fabrication by the Obama administration.

3. Cheryl Mills, Clinton's lawyer at the State Department, told witnesses not to speak to House investigators.

4. The diplomatic personnel on the ground acted with incredible, unheralded heroism.

5. Democrats came to rebut the eyewitnesses with talking points.
The key question remains unanswered:
What did President Barack Obama do when he learned the consulate was under attack, and why?

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2013 ... ing-So-Far

My answer to that?
Our narcissist president was more interested in protecting his re-election bid than
American Citizens and our countries interests.

Some folks here would call BS on my answer above.
I'd agree...cuz, that's all we've heard......so far, from Obama and Clinton.

I think you are being too naive Pud. I don't think your answer is the right one.

Had he sent special forces to save the ambassador, it would only have been good for his reelection.

My opinion is that this ambassador, which by the looks of it was a fine diplomat and a good man, had to go because he wasn't compliant with the US policies in the area, which are to stir shit and lead to a war in the region.

Nic

Good point Nic... maybe they 'let him go'... The bigger problem with the Benghazi incident is potential exposure of administrations' broader policy objective in the region. Which is to energize the less aggressive "moderate" spreaders of Islam, and reestablish the Caliphate. Kinda of a parallel to the effort by some in the US to use a moderate, slow burn 'progressive' path to total state control.