A Complete Waste of Space

sure it is, Pud......who would know better? Frankly, I think my predictions will hold up just fine. I'll be glad to point them out as they happen. Glad, I tell ya!

Whee! Here you go, Pud. Oh, and this guy was my former Rep in PA.......and, sure as hell isn't 'moderate' except compared to the extremist wing of the GOP. He caught a lot of heat over last autumn's GOP screwups. One down, lots more to come.

http://firstread.nbcnews.com/_news/2014 ... etire?lite

callmeslick wrote:Whee! Here you go, Pud. Oh, and this guy was my former Rep in PA.......and, sure as hell isn't 'moderate' except compared to the extremist wing of the GOP. He caught a lot of heat over last autumn's GOP screwups. One down, lots more to come.

http://firstread.nbcnews.com/_news/2014 ... etire?lite

Do you ever read the links you post? That there "bold" words above...ain't mentioned in yer link...thanx for adding them and implying they were stated there... another notch in yer credibility around here....

So..now that's been addressed. What about this below that you're dodging/avoiding?
How's about some verifiable links...not the horse crap ya posted above and added more too..

Pudfark wrote::
Then we have this little diddy you posted above....
"3. flood of positive experiences with the ACA, making the doomsayers seem silly."
Hard to tell if you're forecasting rain...or...reign? Please to direct me to the "flood" of numbers and verifiable experiences of the ObamaCare recipients. Please to include number of "paid" enrolled folks and also the Medicaid enrolled. Please do not include Senator Rand Pauls child in the Medicaid stats.
Thank You.

Oh, and the rest of what you wrote? Pure Drivel.

Waiting?

Pudfark wrote:1,115 people recommend this. Sign Up to see what your friends recommend.

um, my words were there to let you know what the article didn't state. People, angry ones, were camped on Gerlach's office steps in Green Hills for weeks. Several former donors(one I know pretty well) bailed on him. He was going to be toast, after a series of close elections, this time around. Just because they are my words, written to add to a simple re-posted article, doesn't make them less valid. In fact, that is what a forum is for, YOUR OWN THOUGHTS.


Oh, and Res, the quote was funny.

The quote "of them what liked it" was put "in there" on purpose....I found it to be funny too.
Seems you both have a demonstrated aptitude for the comical vs the facts...

callmeslick wrote:um, my words were there to let you know what the article didn't state. People, angry ones, were camped on Gerlach's office steps in Green Hills for weeks. Several former donors(one I know pretty well) bailed on him. He was going to be toast, after a series of close elections, this time around. Just because they are my words, written to add to a simple re-posted article, doesn't make them less valid. In fact, that is what a forum is for, YOUR OWN THOUGHTS.

Oh, and Res, the quote was funny.

um, my words were there to let you know what the article didn't state. That really makes a lot of sense.... Sounds like an excuse to me... Nice to let folks know, after the fact and after I pointed it out....they were your words... I won't credit ya for a "save", cuz I had to drag it out of you...

In fact, that is what a forum is for, YOUR OWN THOUGHTS. Sure would be nice? If ya made a more honest/sincere effort not to co-mingle them and present them as another's? Perhaps, if you read a dab more closely....it'll dawn on ya? That's what I've been doing for the last 4+ years, separating the facts, from my opinions....here. I post opinions and back them up with facts/links. You should give that concept a whirl sometime/anytime. Hell, ya could just use this little paragraph as a tutorial.

Anywho, back to what ya added above with what's his names withdrawal from the elections...well, if'n he shit on himself...he should withdraw. Nothing like another better equipped Republican to help straighten out the mistakes....of the last 5 years.

Pudfark wrote:YOUR OWN THOUGHTS.[/b] Sure would be nice? If ya made a more honest/sincere effort not to co-mingle them and present them as another's? Perhaps, if you read a dab more closely....it'll dawn on ya? That's what I've been doing for the last 4+ years, separating the facts, from my opinions....here. I post opinions and back them up with facts/links. You should give that concept a whirl sometime/anytime. Hell, ya could just use this little paragraph as a tutorial.

this is so damned funny, I almost made it my signature......however, Slappy's is so much more concise. Nice of you to let us all see exactly how delusional you really are, Pud. If you think you've EVER contributed much of personal opinion separated from endless cut and pastes, you need a med check.

callmeslick wrote:Pud. If you think you've EVER contributed much of personal opinion separated from endless cut and pastes, you need a med check.

Well said. That's it in a nutshell.
The dude just can't think for himself.

Reservoir_Dog wrote:

callmeslick wrote:The dude just can't think for himself.

The above is the definition of a good Democrat.
Dear Leader does all the thinking for you "Liberals"

HH

HappyHappy wrote:

Reservoir_Dog wrote:

callmeslick wrote:The dude just can't think for himself.

The above is the definition of a good Democrat.
Dear Leader does all the thinking for you "Liberals"

HH

To bad for you Dear Leader is a fucking IDIOT.

HH