Page 2 of 3

Re: Uh Oh-bamaCare

Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2016 9:19 am
by HappyHappy
Number of Democrats living in the White House in 2017 =0=

Re: Uh Oh-bamaCare

Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2016 9:55 am
by callmeslick
number of socialists-2(Bernie and spouse).

Re: Uh Oh-bamaCare

Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2016 11:00 am
by Pudfark
Pudfark wrote:
callmeslick wrote:ummm, Pud.....I said before the ACA was actually law that it was the best that could beat a filibuster and but step one en route to Single Payer. School me? Teach me how to clean the screen after laughing a spraying coffee on it. :lol:
Provide the quote.... :lol:
Posts a meme from "NerdWallet Health Analysis"....provides comic relief instead of 'affordable care'......irony.

Re: Uh Oh-bamaCare

Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2016 11:02 am
by Pudfark
callmeslick wrote:number of socialists-2(Bernie and spouse).

HH said White House....not 'outhouse'.... :lol:

Re: Uh Oh-bamaCare

Posted: Wed Apr 27, 2016 4:40 pm
by callmeslick

Re: Uh Oh-bamaCare

Posted: Wed Apr 27, 2016 6:58 pm
by HappyHappy
So funny, Bernie laid off his campaign staff.
the Communist is heading back to Vermont.

Re: Uh Oh-bamaCare

Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2016 11:28 am
by Pudfark
callmeslick wrote:apparently missed this one, Pud?
http://www.msn.com/en-us/money/companie ... li=BBnbfcN
Silly I didn't miss anything.... :lol: Your provided link was published several days AFTER I posted this thread.... :lol:

Here's what you missed from your own...'late link' below: :lol:

"Anthem and other insurers have said, in particular, that the government needs to tighten loopholes that let customers buy coverage outside annual enrollment windows. Anthem also wants more flexibility in the type of coverage it can sell in this market.

The Indianapolis-based insurer essentially broke even on its exchange business last year. Company leaders said Wednesday that they hope to eventually make a profit of 3 percent to 5 percent off the business, but that likely won't happen until after 2017.

UnitedHealth, meanwhile, said last week that it lost $475 million on the exchanges last year and expects to lose $650 million this year. The insurer started slowly by selling coverage on only four exchanges for 2014, but its participation ballooned to nearly three dozen states this year."

Seems yer educational background and accomplishments in life are as "Trumped" up as Barry's....... :lol:
No doubt in my mind...you were the first kid on the block, to own velcro shoes.... :roll:

Re: Uh Oh-bamaCare

Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2016 2:12 pm
by callmeslick
don't exactly grasp a new market sorting itself out, now do you? :roll:


yeesh.

Re: Uh Oh-bamaCare

Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2016 4:42 pm
by Pudfark
thanks fer the laugh... :lol: :lol: :lol:

It's certain....nobody can afford Uh Oh-bamaCare...and it's like you not taking yer ED meds, ya can't grasp it....cuz it's too slick. But, ya can make an excuse for it..by telling everybody, you'll sort it out later. ;)

Re: Uh Oh-bamaCare

Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2016 6:48 pm
by callmeslick
at this point, I know at least 200 people utilizing the exchanges. Not one of them has or had any trouble affording basic level policies. Not one.
What is this nonsense about how 'no one' can afford it? Oh yes, just Pud blowing smoke out of his ass again.