A Complete Waste of Space

Pudfark wrote:

callmeslick wrote:I know it's the truth, you can fucking look up the obvious.........or, care to repeat that whopper about 94 million people unemployed. You see, bald assed liars who say stupid shit like you do HAVE to produce links, because you have little awareness of reality, let alone the decency to even attempt honesty.

You're incoherently drooling on yerself........again.

honour thief ain't got no game, he got NOTHIN' .... as per usual!

Reservoir_Dog wrote:

Pudfark wrote:

callmeslick wrote:I know it's the truth, you can fucking look up the obvious.........or, care to repeat that whopper about 94 million people unemployed. You see, bald assed liars who say stupid shit like you do HAVE to produce links, because you have little awareness of reality, let alone the decency to even attempt honesty.

You're incoherently drooling on yerself........again.

honour thief ain't got no game, he got NOTHIN' .... as per usual!

I can read. You can't. Since you infer...you 'got game'? You shouldn't have any problem pointing out in this thread, where I posted/said anything mentioning "94 million people unemployed". Go ahead, standing by...

Just so ya know....you'll be drooling too.

Directly cut from Pud's post on the other sub-forum, this is his method for calculating unemployment in the US:

"The total U.S. population age 16 and over is at least 243 million. Subtracting the nearly 156 million Americans in the labor force in June 2013 -- that is, those who were either working or looking for work -- leaves 87 million Americans, which is close to 90 million."

That's from three years ago....how many jobs were created last month?....that you've yet to mention? "



so, he is counting everyone in the population over the age of 16 not in the labor force:

1. The labor force does not include retirees, so if you're old, you're unemployed in PudLand.
2. The labor force does not include active duty military, so, you're unemployed, soldier!
3. The labor force does not include students, so Johnny, a junior in high school and Suzie, in graduate school for physics, are unemployed.
4. The labor force does not include severely disabled or mentally infirm people, so that quadraplegic fellow down the street is just another
unemployed person by Pud's math. Likewise, Slappy, being mentally non-existent.

so, Pud can dance around what he wrote, bouncing between 87 and 97 million unemployed folks in his blather and bluster about the economy which Obama's team saved, to a great extent. He can dance, but there's the math, above, for all to see.

Holy slam dunk, Batman!

Callmeshit no longer bothers to separate his RD posts from his Callmeshit posts in time
he no longer cares that we know that he posts as an alias just so someone agrees with him.

^^^^^^^^^

see my point? Would any of you all hire the moron who writes stuff like the above? He isn't unemployed, he's a pathetic mental case, who we are obligated, as a society, to care for and keep away from firearms and other dangerous items......like grapefruit spoons and crab mallets.

Pudfark wrote: You shouldn't have any problem pointing out in this thread, where I posted/said anything mentioning "94 million people unemployed". Go ahead, standing by...

callmeslick wrote:Directly cut from Pud's post on the other sub-forum, this is his method for calculating unemployment in the US:

"The total U.S. population age 16 and over is at least 243 million. Subtracting the nearly 156 million Americans in the labor force in June 2013 -- that is, those who were either working or looking for work -- leaves 87 million Americans, which is close to 90 million."

That's from three years ago....how many jobs were created last month?....that you've yet to mention? "

so, Pud can dance around what he wrote, bouncing between 87 and 97 million unemployed folks in his blather and bluster about the economy which Obama's team saved, to a great extent. He can dance, but there's the math, above, for all to see.

Another Total Slick Failure....again.

Read the sig below.....

I never said it was in this thread. I suggested that you repeat the claim from another thread to go with the lies you HAD posted here. Try and keep up, although it much be a challenge for you, being all stupid and shit.

Pudfark wrote:

Pudfark wrote: You shouldn't have any problem pointing out in this thread, where I posted/said anything mentioning "94 million people unemployed". Go ahead, standing by...

callmeslick wrote:Directly cut from Pud's post on the other sub-forum, this is his method for calculating unemployment in the US:

"The total U.S. population age 16 and over is at least 243 million. Subtracting the nearly 156 million Americans in the labor force in June 2013 -- that is, those who were either working or looking for work -- leaves 87 million Americans, which is close to 90 million."

That's from three years ago....how many jobs were created last month?....that you've yet to mention? "

so, Pud can dance around what he wrote, bouncing between 87 and 97 million unemployed folks in his blather and bluster about the economy which Obama's team saved, to a great extent. He can dance, but there's the math, above, for all to see.

Another Total Slick Failure....again.

Read the sig below.....

That's a desperate attempt even by your standards.

callmeslick wrote:I never said it was in this thread. I suggested that you repeat the claim from another thread to go with the lies you HAD posted here. Try and keep up, although it much be a challenge for you, being all stupid and shit.

callmeslick wrote:I lie and drool a lot.

the five years you spent on the 8th grade debate team...didn't help ya at all.

"I suggested that you repeat the claim from another thread".....miserable dishonest fail, again.