A Complete Waste of Space

you moron. You don't count the disabled, those in the armed forces,those in school(16 and up?) and the elderly as 'unemployed'. That feeble math has been mocked for the 5 years since it was first trotted out.


so, either you are a liar or so stupid as to accept those numbers without thinking. Or both.

callmeslick wrote:I am a liar or so stupid as to accept those numbers without thinking.

Fixed.

callmeslick wrote:you moron. You don't count the disabled, those in the armed forces,those in school(16 and up?) and the elderly as 'unemployed'. That feeble math has been mocked for the 5 years since it was first trotted out.


so, either you are a liar or so stupid as to accept those numbers without thinking. Or both.

Where's yer math? Near yer back pockets? Oh, by the way, I didn't count those folks you named above...why don't you do that for me and post the numbers....

you didn't come up with the completely bogus number you cited, by YOUR OWN DEFINITION above, without counting the elderly, the students,the military and the disabled, because all of them are considered not 'employed' by your math.

Naaa Naaaa Naaaa Naaaa Naaaaa

Hillary is going to be indicted!

callmeslick wrote:you didn't come up with the completely bogus number you cited, by YOUR OWN DEFINITION above, without counting the elderly, the students,the military and the disabled, because all of them are considered not 'employed' by your math.

the best you can do? Is guess and complain. Though it is funny to watch you criticize yer own comprehension....