CLINTON WANTS 65% ESTATE TAXES (BUT NOT ON HER FAMILY)

Pudfark

Re: CLINTON WANTS 65% ESTATE TAXES (BUT NOT ON HER FAMILY)

Post by Pudfark »

Reservoir_Dog wrote:
honour thief wrote:Hillary Clinton wants to increase the estate tax to 65 percent on the wealthiest Americans, according to her latest tax plan.
The Clinton campaign estimates that the increase would raise an addition $75 billion in revenue over the next decade. The current rate maxes out at 40 percent.

But Hillary Clinton and her husband Bill have created a number of tax shelters in recent years to dramatically limit their payment of the very same tax. As Bloomberg reported back in 2014: “To reduce the tax pinch, the Clintons are using financial planning strategies befitting the top 1 percent of U.S. households in wealth.”

In 2010 the Clinton created “residential trusts” and the following year moved their Chappaqua estate into the trust, according to their financial records. As David Scott Sloan, a partner at the firm Holland Knight explained the Clinton trust to CBS News, “You’re creating things that are going to be on the nontaxable side of the balance sheet when they die.”

The move will save the Clintons hundreds of thousands of dollars in estate taxes, according to accountants quoted by Bloomberg.

Even more substantial, the Clintons created a life insurance trust in 2010, which will shelter life insurance payments from estate taxes. This is their second such trust. The first was created in 1996, according to financial disclosures.

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
It's funny when you copy and paste and then try to pass it off like you typed it and they're your words. :lol: :lol: :lol:
http://www.breitbart.com/2016-president ... er-family/
Finally got ya to do yer home work..... :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: Good doggie.... ;)
User avatar
callmeslick
Posts: 16473
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:02 pm
Location: Fearing and loathing in Delaware and Virginia.

Re: CLINTON WANTS 65% ESTATE TAXES (BUT NOT ON HER FAMILY)

Post by callmeslick »

so you're proud to quote fascists?
Pudfark wrote: Mon May 29, 2017 11:15 am I live in Texas....you live in America.
Pudfark

Re: CLINTON WANTS 65% ESTATE TAXES (BUT NOT ON HER FAMILY)

Post by Pudfark »

callmeslick wrote:so you're proud to quote fascists?
I don't care what ya call R_D.... :lol:
User avatar
Reservoir_Dog
Posts: 8858
Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 3:46 pm
Location: Kicking and a' gouging in the mud and the blood and the beer.

Re: CLINTON WANTS 65% ESTATE TAXES (BUT NOT ON HER FAMILY)

Post by Reservoir_Dog »

Pudfark wrote:
Reservoir_Dog wrote:
honour thief wrote:Hillary Clinton wants to increase the estate tax to 65 percent on the wealthiest Americans, according to her latest tax plan.
The Clinton campaign estimates that the increase would raise an addition $75 billion in revenue over the next decade. The current rate maxes out at 40 percent.

But Hillary Clinton and her husband Bill have created a number of tax shelters in recent years to dramatically limit their payment of the very same tax. As Bloomberg reported back in 2014: “To reduce the tax pinch, the Clintons are using financial planning strategies befitting the top 1 percent of U.S. households in wealth.”

In 2010 the Clinton created “residential trusts” and the following year moved their Chappaqua estate into the trust, according to their financial records. As David Scott Sloan, a partner at the firm Holland Knight explained the Clinton trust to CBS News, “You’re creating things that are going to be on the nontaxable side of the balance sheet when they die.”

The move will save the Clintons hundreds of thousands of dollars in estate taxes, according to accountants quoted by Bloomberg.

Even more substantial, the Clintons created a life insurance trust in 2010, which will shelter life insurance payments from estate taxes. This is their second such trust. The first was created in 1996, according to financial disclosures.

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
It's funny when you copy and paste and then try to pass it off like you typed it and they're your words. :lol: :lol: :lol:
http://www.breitbart.com/2016-president ... er-family/
Finally got ya to do yer home work..... :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: Good doggie.... ;)
Nice try, plagiarizer. You got caught, bitch.
User avatar
callmeslick
Posts: 16473
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:02 pm
Location: Fearing and loathing in Delaware and Virginia.

Re: CLINTON WANTS 65% ESTATE TAXES (BUT NOT ON HER FAMILY)

Post by callmeslick »

at this stage, Res, do you really think any string of lucid words more than, say, 4, is potentially written by Pud? That cretin is lucky that he learned cut and paste. :lol:
Pudfark wrote: Mon May 29, 2017 11:15 am I live in Texas....you live in America.
Pudfark

Re: CLINTON WANTS 65% ESTATE TAXES (BUT NOT ON HER FAMILY)

Post by Pudfark »

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Been doing that for years..... :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: just like you and Slick..... :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

:lol: :lol: :lol: at the wad...yer knickers are in... :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

I've always said you were stupid....now adding 'slow' to the list. ;)

Old Pudfark sez: " Funny how he's never said anything....about the Huff-Po shit, ya post..... :lol: :lol: :lol: "
User avatar
Reservoir_Dog
Posts: 8858
Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 3:46 pm
Location: Kicking and a' gouging in the mud and the blood and the beer.

Re: CLINTON WANTS 65% ESTATE TAXES (BUT NOT ON HER FAMILY)

Post by Reservoir_Dog »

Pudfark wrote::lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Been doing that for years..... :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: just like you and Slick..... :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

:lol: :lol: :lol: at the wad...yer knickers are in... :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

I've always said you were stupid....now adding 'slow' to the list. ;)

Old Pudfark sez: " Funny how he's never said anything....about the Huff-Po shit, ya post..... :lol: :lol: :lol: "
Nice try, plagiarizer. You got caught, bitch.
All the laughing smilies in the world ain't gonna change that.
User avatar
callmeslick
Posts: 16473
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:02 pm
Location: Fearing and loathing in Delaware and Virginia.

Re: CLINTON WANTS 65% ESTATE TAXES (BUT NOT ON HER FAMILY)

Post by callmeslick »

there really should be a smiley quota or something.
Pudfark wrote: Mon May 29, 2017 11:15 am I live in Texas....you live in America.
User avatar
Reservoir_Dog
Posts: 8858
Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 3:46 pm
Location: Kicking and a' gouging in the mud and the blood and the beer.

Re: CLINTON WANTS 65% ESTATE TAXES (BUT NOT ON HER FAMILY)

Post by Reservoir_Dog »

callmeslick wrote:there really should be a smiley quota or something.
The guy plagiarizes ... admits he's been doing it for years ... and laughs about it.
It is any wonder we think he's a joke.
Pudfark

Re: CLINTON WANTS 65% ESTATE TAXES (BUT NOT ON HER FAMILY)

Post by Pudfark »

Reservoir_Dog wrote:
callmeslick wrote:there really should be a smiley quota or something.
The guy plagiarizes ... admits he's been doing it for years ... and laughs about it.
It is any wonder we think he's a joke.
It's obvious, to all, this thread is 'taxing' you both.... :lol:
Post Reply