Obama refuse to allow prosecution of voter intimidation case

User avatar
callmeslick
Posts: 16473
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:02 pm
Location: Fearing and loathing in Delaware and Virginia.

Re: Obama refuse to allow prosecution of voter intimidation case

Post by callmeslick »

HappyHappy wrote:Callmesick, I knew you would defend the fascist Obama regime no matter the crime!
Face it, if those were KKK at a polling place they would be facing 30 years in the slammer.
But because they are members of a group friendly to the current regime they
got away with it.

This will be a fun presidential election, I can't wait!
All this will haunt Obama and the Pelosiites and cost most of them their jobs.

LMAO!
HH

moron. I at no time defended anything. I suggested politics at work.
Pudfark wrote: Mon May 29, 2017 11:15 am I live in Texas....you live in America.
HappyHappy

Re: Obama refuse to allow prosecution of voter intimidation case

Post by HappyHappy »

moron.
Again I thank you for the compliment!
It's about spin Callmesick, you spin it as to be
a mere minor political issue.
I see it in a totaly different light. I see it as Osama Obama's
storm troopers enforcing the vote.

Note that the only major US news organisation not seeing
this issue as newsworthy is
Commie News Network.
CNN seems to dislike risking an insult to their BOY.

"Civil Rights Panel to Renew Subpoenas, Pursue Federal Probe in Black Panther Case"

LMAO Sick, your BOY is using storm troops to enforce the vote and got caught!

A little throw back to the 1933 elections in Germany?

Sturmabteilung Obama style! Brown shirts with brown skin. :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen:

HH
Pudfark

Re: Obama refuse to allow prosecution of voter intimidation case

Post by Pudfark »

callmeslick wrote:I'm not altogether sure your source for that agreement is credible. Sorry.
Pudfark wrote:http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/07 ... ther-case/

There ya go Slick.... :) it was just a google away.... ;)
Well, Slick...you're always challenging folks to "prove it up"...there it is for you.... Just curious, if the reason is Fox News? Why are they not being sued for slander or libel...all the time? Saw a little shindig on Beck yesterday that says the NAACP and the New Black Panthers are in bed together....along with Obama....Beck showed the paper/video trail to prove it....

It interests me why (by your tacit silence) you would ignore this issue...Do you believe anybody has the right to espouse killing whites and their babies? In public, in a voting place? What would/do you think of someone "pulling strings" to subvert justice in a matter like this? Do you know what a terroristic threat is? What is right about all of this?

Old Pudfark sez: " Is this more of "talking to the hand"?...probably... "
Wullie

Re: Obama refuse to allow prosecution of voter intimidation case

Post by Wullie »

Just how fast would wold a hooded klansman be tried for standing outside a polling place telling everyone that he hates blacks/negroes/niggers (or any other less than PC word that has been used to describe them) and to kill them and kill their kids?

Faster than a cat can lick its' ass. I'd bet ol Barry S might even want to renew his and his old lady's lawyer licenses to get some of that action.
HappyHappy

Re: Obama refuse to allow prosecution of voter intimidation case

Post by HappyHappy »

And from Callmesick, crickets.....

Image

HH
Pudfark

Re: Obama refuse to allow prosecution of voter intimidation case

Post by Pudfark »

Pudfark wrote:
callmeslick wrote:I'm not altogether sure your source for that agreement is credible. Sorry.
Pudfark wrote:http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/07 ... ther-case/

There ya go Slick.... :) it was just a google away.... ;)
Well, Slick...you're always challenging folks to "prove it up"...there it is for you.... Just curious, if the reason is Fox News? Why are they not being sued for slander or libel...all the time? Saw a little shindig on Beck yesterday that says the NAACP and the New Black Panthers are in bed together....along with Obama....Beck showed the paper/video trail to prove it....

It interests me why (by your tacit silence) you would ignore this issue...Do you believe anybody has the right to espouse killing whites and their babies? In public, in a voting place? What would/do you think of someone "pulling strings" to subvert justice in a matter like this? Do you know what a terroristic threat is? What is right about all of this?

Old Pudfark sez: " Is this more of "talking to the hand"?...probably... "
Bump for Slick.... :oops:
HappyHappy

Re: Obama refuse to allow prosecution of voter intimidation case

Post by HappyHappy »

Just when most of us have our foot in Callmesick's nuts he disappears....

LMAO!

HH
User avatar
callmeslick
Posts: 16473
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:02 pm
Location: Fearing and loathing in Delaware and Virginia.

Re: Obama refuse to allow prosecution of voter intimidation case

Post by callmeslick »

Wullie wrote:Just how fast would wold a hooded klansman be tried for standing outside a polling place telling everyone that he hates blacks/negroes/niggers (or any other less than PC word that has been used to describe them) and to kill them and kill their kids?

Faster than a cat can lick its' ass. I'd bet ol Barry S might even want to renew his and his old lady's lawyer licenses to get some of that action.
you realize that this essentially happened for 50 years in this nation(or more) ? At no time did I suggest that it was a good thing not to prosecute any such case. The only issue I have is that you morons are making such a huge deal of this. If you know any Federal Judges or US Attorneys, you realize that these folks are loaded down with cases. How and why they choose not to pursue things is sometimes pure politics, sometimes just a case of importance.
How, in the name of God, can you people, with the nation facing two war fronts, oil spewage in the gulf, an economy in decline for 30 years, a recent near-depression, a national infrastructure heading downhill, etc,
claim that this stupid incident should be front-burner?
Pudfark wrote: Mon May 29, 2017 11:15 am I live in Texas....you live in America.
User avatar
callmeslick
Posts: 16473
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:02 pm
Location: Fearing and loathing in Delaware and Virginia.

Re: Obama refuse to allow prosecution of voter intimidation case

Post by callmeslick »

HappyHappy wrote:Hot button topic, please post!

whose words are these? Doing the bidding of your masters, huh?
When an incident that apparently isn't proven to have affected the outcome of any election is a Hot Button Topic(for certain groups whose interest lies somewhere between petty politics and pure bigotry), you can be certain that the folks driving that Topic have no real concern for their nation. They just want to pursue trivia.
The nation has SO many things to deal with, and this is "hot button"? How truly lame.
Pudfark wrote: Mon May 29, 2017 11:15 am I live in Texas....you live in America.
HappyHappy

Re: Obama refuse to allow prosecution of voter intimidation case

Post by HappyHappy »

Callmesick, as a devout Atheist I do not let the God myth cloud my judgement.
Oil in the gulf, two wars and Obama operating a Fascist regime.
Get those storm troopers out and vote early, and vote often.

We the people are watching a huge injustice here. A bunch of armed Obama
supporters enforcing the vote get away with it because
the current regime encouraged this behavior?
Maybe that is a reach, but it is how I see it.

Another nail in the Obama political coffin!

HH
Post Reply