Remember folks, Slick was defending illegals being here

Pudfark

Re: Remember folks, Slick was defending illegals being here

Post by Pudfark »

Pudfark wrote:I find it amusing that you fail to recognize your country's contribution to the Afghan war, in aiding and abetting Afghan war deserters....the least you could do is take the meskins along with them...
Old Pudfark sez: " Nobody here gives a shit about your immigration requirements....well, maybe Slick..in the near future.. "
Daiichidoku
Posts: 680
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 4:09 pm

Re: Remember folks, Slick was defending illegals being here

Post by Daiichidoku »

i see youve posted several new threads Rugg, im wondering, are you done with this one? anymore discussion about this, in response to my last post perhaps?
Image
ruggbutt
Posts: 2147
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2009 12:11 am

Re: Remember folks, Slick was defending illegals being here

Post by ruggbutt »

Having dealt with illegals on a daily basis it's not difficult to see the writing on the wall. The odds are extremely good that those women are illegals. I remember posting a thread here about how someone who doesn't speak english at all is here illegally. That also happens to be true. Paperwork that has to be filled out as well as citizenship tests are all given in english.

Regardless of what you assume to be true, those of us that deal with illegals on a daily basis just might have a little more insight than you do.
Image
All the cool LOMAC stuff
Reservoir_Dog wrote:It's been a long time since she's cum
Daiichidoku
Posts: 680
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 4:09 pm

Re: Remember folks, Slick was defending illegals being here

Post by Daiichidoku »

ruggbutt wrote:Having dealt with illegals on a daily basis it's not difficult to see the writing on the wall. The odds are extremely good that those women are illegals. I remember posting a thread here about how someone who doesn't speak english at all is here illegally. That also happens to be true. Paperwork that has to be filled out as well as citizenship tests are all given in english.

Regardless of what you assume to be true, those of us that deal with illegals on a daily basis just might have a little more insight than you do.

this is a response? seems more akin to obfuscation, IMHO

why would you post this, when i already posted
Daii wrote:I get the gist of what youre saying Rugg
and
Daii wrote:dont get me wrong Rugg, it would SEEM that indeeed, illegal mexican chicks are trying to ride the coattails of those who seek only a better life
?


would you address that at this monent, the statements you made have not been proven, and you are making a fact out of things that are simply not facts (based on the item you posted), and this is bad form for ANYone to do?

i think the above case is clear, im hoping you will agree with this and say so

otherwise i can only relegate you, in my mind (such as it is), to a degree of oxygen thief only reached by a certain two morons who also post at CWOS

i'll be mildly surprised if you dont





btw, im not assuming any position in this case is true, only that no facts have surfaced yet, proving that any judgement on particulars in this case is speculation at best, and its easy for specualtion (on any subject) to become "fact" and that is distinctly dangerous
Image
Pudfark

Re: Remember folks, Slick was defending illegals being here

Post by Pudfark »

Seems like you over looked this Daii...........
Pudfark wrote:Pudfark wrote:
I find it amusing that you fail to recognize your country's contribution to the Afghan war, in aiding and abetting Afghan war deserters....the least you could do is take the meskins along with them...
Old Pudfark sez: " The Maple Leaf is starting to look like a Poppy and you'll need the meskins to pick'em "
Daiichidoku
Posts: 680
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 4:09 pm

Re: Remember folks, Slick was defending illegals being here

Post by Daiichidoku »

i largely have little or no consideration to posting responses to your posts, that i consider hyperbole (although not as refined as sgt loser's) and yokelism

perhaps if you start to post things beyond "rah-rah our side" or "yar-boo that side", that actually contribute, even if cloaked in "humour", i would respond

as in the case with sgt loser and yourself, i wont ignore what you post, as i feel that by ignoring what is said, even by assholes such as sergio valente, or something i dont agree with, can deny one a chance to learn something new
responding is another story, there is no point, as you have thus far displayed little to no constructive discussion (aside from fodder for ridicule) and not enough effort attempting to "comport yourself with utmost civility"...


that said, when you first starting posting here, you werent an asshole, and in fact, your yokelisms were mildly fun..but somewhere along the line you degenerated into a gibbering myopic tard..i dunno, maybe it was moron-peer-pressure after seeing sgt loser's posts?

for me, your attack on Soapy some time ago was the tell
Image
Post Reply