turn on the TV, it is easier. Somebody leaked around 90,000 documents dated from 2004 to present regarding Afghanistan, Pakistan and the war over there. Generally, internal Pentagon memos.ruggbutt wrote:Anyone wanna link me to the story you're talking about?
WikiLeaks
- callmeslick
- Posts: 16473
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:02 pm
- Location: Fearing and loathing in Delaware and Virginia.
Re: WikiLeaks
-
- Posts: 680
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 4:09 pm
Re: WikiLeaks
take your pick
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikileaks
BTW Rugg, still waiting for you to confirm or deny that you made a story from non-facts RE:BMWs
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikileaks
BTW Rugg, still waiting for you to confirm or deny that you made a story from non-facts RE:BMWs

- callmeslick
- Posts: 16473
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:02 pm
- Location: Fearing and loathing in Delaware and Virginia.
Re: WikiLeaks
Daiichidoku wrote:
BTW Rugg, still waiting for you to confirm or deny that you made a story from non-facts RE:BMWs
pour yourself a drink while waiting for that one, Daii. And, whilst waiting, prepare dinner for 12, power wash the deck, and rebuild the engine on your car, using only tweezers and chopsticks as tools. Get back to me after that and let me know if Ruggie has fessed up.

-
- Posts: 680
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 4:09 pm
-
- Posts: 1384
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 11:23 pm
- Location: The lone Conservative voice in the Liberal Bastion of Portland Oregon
Re: WikiLeaks
well hopefully this isnt just posturing on the part of the Administration.The Obama administration on Monday called the release of thousands of classified documents on the Afghanistan war a "breach of federal law," as a prominent senator said the government needs to press charges in the case.
next question, how do they proceed and convict??
"In reality, there exists only fact and fiction.
Opinions result from a lack of the former and a reliance on the latter."

Opinions result from a lack of the former and a reliance on the latter."

Re: WikiLeaks
Network TV? I don't waste my time.callmeslick wrote: turn on the TV, it is easier.
- callmeslick
- Posts: 16473
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:02 pm
- Location: Fearing and loathing in Delaware and Virginia.
Re: WikiLeaks
I'm sure it isn't. This makes their job that much harder.CUDA wrote:well hopefully this isnt just posturing on the part of the Administration.The Obama administration on Monday called the release of thousands of classified documents on the Afghanistan war a "breach of federal law," as a prominent senator said the government needs to press charges in the case.
well, if they can determine the source within the Pentagon, they can arrest and charge them with one of several possible charges. Probably not treason, but there are other statutes dealing with improper use of classified material, and maybe even sedition, if you could prove intent to harm the government. As for WikiLeaks, they have no real recourse. Some of the slower students here would say that Obama will use it as an excuse to 'shut down the Internet', but we both know that nothing of the kind will occur.next question, how do they proceed and convict??
- callmeslick
- Posts: 16473
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:02 pm
- Location: Fearing and loathing in Delaware and Virginia.
Re: WikiLeaks
even Fox is covering this. You're all set.ruggbutt wrote:Network TV? I don't waste my time.callmeslick wrote: turn on the TV, it is easier.

- callmeslick
- Posts: 16473
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:02 pm
- Location: Fearing and loathing in Delaware and Virginia.