Page 11 of 15

Re: Whats with Obama

Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2011 11:08 am
by Dawg
Buzz wrote: The most childish member we've ever had here.

After all my work here....
That cut buzz...cut me deep :(

Re: Whats with Obama

Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2011 11:21 am
by Buzz
Dawg wrote:
Buzz wrote: The most childish member we've ever had here.

After all my work here....
That cut buzz...cut me deep :(
You're 2nd. :mrgreen:

Re: Whats with Obama

Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2011 12:28 pm
by Pudfark
To continue the egregious thread drift/hijack.... :roll:

If one should choose the HH pill, the results may vary....
There is the oral version...and the suppository version....
It just "depends" on how you take it..... ;)

Re: Whats with Obama

Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2011 1:44 pm
by Darkhorse
HappyHappy wrote:Evolution is fact supported by good science.
HH
No it is nothing but theories, it is a long way from facts. You post one of your facts and I will show you by good science that it is only a theory and I will also post using good science many holes in your fact (i.e. theory).

Re: Whats with Obama

Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2011 2:58 pm
by Barfly
But the evidence only points to evolution.

Re: Whats with Obama

Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2011 3:58 pm
by Buzz
The only point HH can make is on his head. (Dunce Hat)


http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=htt ... w&dur=4954

Re: Whats with Obama

Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2011 4:55 pm
by CUDA
Darkhorse wrote:
HappyHappy wrote:Evolution is fact supported by good science.
HH
No it is nothing but theories, it is a long way from facts. You post one of your facts and I will show you by good science that it is only a theory and I will also post using good science many holes in your fact (i.e. theory).
well we all know HH is no Einstein ;)
Barfly wrote:But the evidence only points to evolution.
that's Questionable

I was reading the latest Nat Geo where they have an article that calculates the amount of people that "should" have lived on the earth over the last 30K years. it has a total of 108 Billion. surely if that was the case we would have a larger fossil record to glean from. where is it? even Darwin stated if there was a flaw in his theory it was the lack of the fossil records

honestly I don't have the answers. but I do have a TON of questions that science has not yet been able to answer.

Re: Whats with Obama

Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2011 5:45 pm
by callmeslick
Darkhorse wrote:
HappyHappy wrote:Evolution is fact supported by good science.
HH
No it is nothing but theories, it is a long way from facts. You post one of your facts and I will show you by good science that it is only a theory and I will also post using good science many holes in your fact (i.e. theory).

real easy. The recent e coli outbreak is living proof that evolution occurs. Evolution is a fact. What is theoretical is the Origin of Species and various evolutionary pathways which have a very difficult body of experimentation/discovery to go through before being anywhere near proven fact.

Re: Whats with Obama

Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2011 5:46 pm
by CUDA
callmeslick wrote:
Darkhorse wrote:
HappyHappy wrote:Evolution is fact supported by good science.
HH
No it is nothing but theories, it is a long way from facts. You post one of your facts and I will show you by good science that it is only a theory and I will also post using good science many holes in your fact (i.e. theory).

real easy. The recent e coli outbreak is living proof that evolution occurs. Evolution is a fact. What is theoretical is the Origin of Species and various evolutionary pathways which have a very difficult body of experimentation/discovery to go through before being anywhere near proven fact.
agreed 100%

Re: Whats with Obama

Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2011 6:48 pm
by Dawg

I was reading the latest Nat Geo where they have an article that calculates the amount of people that "should" have lived on the earth over the last 30K years. it has a total of 108 Billion. surely if that was the case we would have a larger fossil record to glean from. where is it? even Darwin stated if there was a flaw in his theory it was the lack of the fossil records.

erm, it takes a minimum of 10K years for a fossil to form, and to form it must be enveloped in a couple of specific kinds of material. Additionally it must be covered quickly and not eaten, burned, rotted, decomposed or stuffed and mounted.
Problem is that humans for quite some time have been tending to fellow dead humans with ceremonies that aren't conducive to making human fossils.
Further, that chart is mathematically progressive, certainly there weren't 50 million humans around 30,000 years ago, eh?
Evolution is a fact. as I said earlier, how arrogant of man to think a divine being wouldn't setup such a method to adapt to what would likely be an ever changing universe.