Sublime Opinions of the Masses (give or take a few)
https://acompletewasteofspace.com/
True.Dawg wrote:Additionally it must be covered quickly and not eaten, burned, rotted, decomposed or stuffed and mounted.
Problem is that humans for quite some time have been tending to fellow dead humans with ceremonies that aren't conducive to making human fossils.
all supposed 108 billion were disposed of in this manner??? if that's not the case and some died in a normal non-disposed of manner then explain the Dinosaur fossils and no man fossils. just another question I haveDawg wrote:
I was reading the latest Nat Geo where they have an article that calculates the amount of people that "should" have lived on the earth over the last 30K years. it has a total of 108 Billion. surely if that was the case we would have a larger fossil record to glean from. where is it? even Darwin stated if there was a flaw in his theory it was the lack of the fossil records.
erm, it takes a minimum of 10K years for a fossil to form, and to form it must be enveloped in a couple of specific kinds of material. Additionally it must be covered quickly and not eaten, burned, rotted, decomposed or stuffed and mounted.
Problem is that humans for quite some time have been tending to fellow dead humans with ceremonies that aren't conducive to making human fossils.
I didn't make the chart, I just reported what the man calculated. his claim is 108 billion have walked the earth since man has been around, if that's true there HAS to be some kind of physical record. fossil, written or otherwise. it does not seem to exist. why? even the oldest man made structures date back only approx 8-10k years.Further, that chart is mathematically progressive, certainly there weren't 50 million humans around 30,000 years ago, eh?
did I say evolution wasn't fact? now your sounding like HH. and we all know what an Einstein he is. Slick was right it's origin of species that is so far unprovable, not evolution.Evolution is a fact. as I said earlier, how arrogant of man to think a divine being wouldn't setup such a method to adapt to what would likely be an ever changing universe.
Dawg wrote:
I was reading the latest Nat Geo where they have an article that calculates the amount of people that "should" have lived on the earth over the last 30K years. it has a total of 108 Billion. surely if that was the case we would have a larger fossil record to glean from. where is it? even Darwin stated if there was a flaw in his theory it was the lack of the fossil records.
erm, it takes a minimum of 10K years for a fossil to form, and to form it must be enveloped in a couple of specific kinds of material. Additionally it must be covered quickly and not eaten, burned, rotted, decomposed or stuffed and mounted.
Problem is that humans for quite some time have been tending to fellow dead humans with ceremonies that aren't conducive to making human fossils.
Further, that chart is mathematically progressive, certainly there weren't 50 million humans around 30,000 years ago, eh?
Evolution is a fact. as I said earlier, how arrogant of man to think a divine being wouldn't setup such a method to adapt to what would likely be an ever changing universe.
uhm...http://news.discovery.com/archaeology/o ... -cave.html 23,000 years.why? even the oldest man made structures date back only approx 8-10k years.
again, you think music and the written word just came into existence? One day you're not running from some other Neanderthals trying to smash your head and suddenly they have time to create? Look at our own technological advancements for fucksake, 100 years ago, a mere blink, crap, LESS than a blink in time we were clueless about bacteria, radio waves, genetics, its quantum leap man, 50 years from now, we'll know 4 times as much as we did 50 years ago.I didn't make the chart, I just reported what the man calculated. his claim is 108 billion have walked the earth since man has been around, if that's true there HAS to be some kind of physical record. fossil, written or otherwise.
"If this is correctly dated and correctly interpreted....How was it dated? Who interpreted it?
How was it dated?HappyHappy wrote:http://haysvillelibrary.files.wordpress ... boldt1.jpg
Early Bird about 150,000,000 years ago.
HH
the one where he goes into a dead restaurant and tries to turn it around.Buzz wrote:Hell's Kitchen??
You like a lot of screaming for no reason?
Dawg, I'd love to respond to what you said. but my English to gibberish translator is brokenDawg wrote:uhm...http://news.discovery.com/archaeology/o ... -cave.html 23,000 years.why? even the oldest man made structures date back only approx 8-10k years.
As I'm only guessing, our oldest structures being made of shit that wasn't like concrete and plastics pretty much as rotted away with the passing of time, no? And then the old standby of finding a cave, or just standing there like a dumbass cave man in the rain with no cave was probably hugely popular then.
You think we dropped outta the trees and started the pyramids?again, you think music and the written word just came into existence? One day you're not running from some other Neanderthals trying to smash your head and suddenly they have time to create? Look at our own technological advancements for fucksake, 100 years ago, a mere blink, crap, LESS than a blink in time we were clueless about bacteria, radio waves, genetics, its quantum leap man, 50 years from now, we'll know 4 times as much as we did 50 years ago.I didn't make the chart, I just reported what the man calculated. his claim is 108 billion have walked the earth since man has been around, if that's true there HAS to be some kind of physical record. fossil, written or otherwise.
Jump back just a bit further, 500 years, flat earth, 5 planets and the sun that spun (maybe) around us, go 1000 years back again...
our brains alone are proof of our own evolution- you dont have to sprout curved beaks and wings to evolve. Mentally we are..oh fuck it, Hells Kitchen is on, later
