SANDY HOOK FATHER OWNS CONGRESS

Pudfark

Re: SANDY HOOK FATHER OWNS CONGRESS

Post by Pudfark »

callmeslick wrote:
Buzz wrote:Actually, it did have an effect. There's a shit load more assault guns on the streets now.
are you suggesting that is the effect of cancelling the ban? If so, perhaps you are right.....hence the need to reinstate it. This shit didn't happen until after the ban had been lifted, huh?
Pudfark wrote:Sorta like explaining windmills to Don Quixote.....Buzz.
Slick is just being himself...deliberately obstinate. :P
With no proof other than substituting his opinion for fact.
Even Biden (Slick's buddy) says a ban will have no effect on mass murders.
User avatar
Buzz
Posts: 2240
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 1:37 pm
Location: Colorado

Re: SANDY HOOK FATHER OWNS CONGRESS

Post by Buzz »

callmeslick wrote:
Buzz wrote:Actually, it did have an effect. There's a shit load more assault guns on the streets now.
are you suggesting that is the effect of cancelling the ban? If so, perhaps you are right.....hence the need to reinstate it. This shit didn't happen until after the ban had been lifted, huh?
Too late. They're all sold, and are now 2 years behind in production.

I can't imagine how much money the government would have to spend to confiscate all of them? Better raise the debt ceiling again.
User avatar
Reservoir_Dog
Posts: 8858
Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 3:46 pm
Location: Kicking and a' gouging in the mud and the blood and the beer.

Re: SANDY HOOK FATHER OWNS CONGRESS

Post by Reservoir_Dog »

Vladimir Putin is riding a bear.
All of your arguments have been rendered invalid.

Image





Image
User avatar
callmeslick
Posts: 16473
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:02 pm
Location: Fearing and loathing in Delaware and Virginia.

Re: SANDY HOOK FATHER OWNS CONGRESS

Post by callmeslick »

Buzz wrote: I can't imagine how much money the government would have to spend to confiscate all of them? Better raise the debt ceiling again.

probably why no one has plans to confiscate anything, Buzz. Merely banning sale is not confiscation.
Pudfark wrote: Mon May 29, 2017 11:15 am I live in Texas....you live in America.
User avatar
Buzz
Posts: 2240
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 1:37 pm
Location: Colorado

Re: SANDY HOOK FATHER OWNS CONGRESS

Post by Buzz »

What will that accomplish? You don't think the millions of assault rifles already on the streets will be enough for the mental killers?

This whole thing is so stupid. It's a sham to shut up the tree huggers.
User avatar
callmeslick
Posts: 16473
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:02 pm
Location: Fearing and loathing in Delaware and Virginia.

Re: SANDY HOOK FATHER OWNS CONGRESS

Post by callmeslick »

If they cannot be sold legally, and regs are tightened for proper securing of weapons, less chance for nuts to get one. Geez, this stuff ought to be easy to grasp, Buzz, it really should.
Pudfark wrote: Mon May 29, 2017 11:15 am I live in Texas....you live in America.
Pudfark

Re: SANDY HOOK FATHER OWNS CONGRESS

Post by Pudfark »

Grasp this concept Slick.
Leave legitimate gun owners alone.
Go after mental cases and criminals.
Mental cases should be easy...remember, we have ObamaCare.
Criminals are easy...they have a documented history.
Why do you advocate doing things the hard way?
User avatar
Reservoir_Dog
Posts: 8858
Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 3:46 pm
Location: Kicking and a' gouging in the mud and the blood and the beer.

Re: SANDY HOOK FATHER OWNS CONGRESS

Post by Reservoir_Dog »

Pudfark wrote:Go after mental cases and criminals.
Mental cases should be easy...remember, we have ObamaCare.
I thought you didn't want them to take your guns! :lol:
Pudfark

Re: SANDY HOOK FATHER OWNS CONGRESS

Post by Pudfark »

There ya go being silly again...R_D

I just don't want them to try....it'd be messy and unnecessary.
User avatar
Reservoir_Dog
Posts: 8858
Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 3:46 pm
Location: Kicking and a' gouging in the mud and the blood and the beer.

Re: SANDY HOOK FATHER OWNS CONGRESS

Post by Reservoir_Dog »

Pudfark wrote:I just don't want them to try....it'd be messy and unnecessary.
Why? What would you do?
Post Reply