Buzz wrote:Actually, it did have an effect. There's a shit load more assault guns on the streets now.
are you suggesting that is the effect of cancelling the ban? If so, perhaps you are right.....hence the need to reinstate it. This shit didn't happen until after the ban had been lifted, huh?
Pudfark wrote:Sorta like explaining windmills to Don Quixote.....Buzz.
Slick is just being himself...deliberately obstinate.
With no proof other than substituting his opinion for fact.
Even Biden (Slick's buddy) says a ban will have no effect on mass murders.
Buzz wrote:Actually, it did have an effect. There's a shit load more assault guns on the streets now.
are you suggesting that is the effect of cancelling the ban? If so, perhaps you are right.....hence the need to reinstate it. This shit didn't happen until after the ban had been lifted, huh?
Too late. They're all sold, and are now 2 years behind in production.
I can't imagine how much money the government would have to spend to confiscate all of them? Better raise the debt ceiling again.
If they cannot be sold legally, and regs are tightened for proper securing of weapons, less chance for nuts to get one. Geez, this stuff ought to be easy to grasp, Buzz, it really should.
Pudfark wrote: Mon May 29, 2017 11:15 am
I live in Texas....you live in America.
Grasp this concept Slick.
Leave legitimate gun owners alone.
Go after mental cases and criminals.
Mental cases should be easy...remember, we have ObamaCare.
Criminals are easy...they have a documented history.
Why do you advocate doing things the hard way?