Page 13 of 18

Re: SANDY HOOK FATHER OWNS CONGRESS

Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2013 5:29 pm
by Pudfark
callmeslick wrote:
Buzz wrote:Actually, it did have an effect. There's a shit load more assault guns on the streets now.
are you suggesting that is the effect of cancelling the ban? If so, perhaps you are right.....hence the need to reinstate it. This shit didn't happen until after the ban had been lifted, huh?
Pudfark wrote:Sorta like explaining windmills to Don Quixote.....Buzz.
Slick is just being himself...deliberately obstinate. :P
With no proof other than substituting his opinion for fact.
Even Biden (Slick's buddy) says a ban will have no effect on mass murders.

Re: SANDY HOOK FATHER OWNS CONGRESS

Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2013 6:36 pm
by Buzz
callmeslick wrote:
Buzz wrote:Actually, it did have an effect. There's a shit load more assault guns on the streets now.
are you suggesting that is the effect of cancelling the ban? If so, perhaps you are right.....hence the need to reinstate it. This shit didn't happen until after the ban had been lifted, huh?
Too late. They're all sold, and are now 2 years behind in production.

I can't imagine how much money the government would have to spend to confiscate all of them? Better raise the debt ceiling again.

Re: SANDY HOOK FATHER OWNS CONGRESS

Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2013 6:42 pm
by Reservoir_Dog
Vladimir Putin is riding a bear.
All of your arguments have been rendered invalid.

Image





Image

Re: SANDY HOOK FATHER OWNS CONGRESS

Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2013 6:44 pm
by callmeslick
Buzz wrote: I can't imagine how much money the government would have to spend to confiscate all of them? Better raise the debt ceiling again.

probably why no one has plans to confiscate anything, Buzz. Merely banning sale is not confiscation.

Re: SANDY HOOK FATHER OWNS CONGRESS

Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2013 6:55 pm
by Buzz
What will that accomplish? You don't think the millions of assault rifles already on the streets will be enough for the mental killers?

This whole thing is so stupid. It's a sham to shut up the tree huggers.

Re: SANDY HOOK FATHER OWNS CONGRESS

Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2013 7:49 pm
by callmeslick
If they cannot be sold legally, and regs are tightened for proper securing of weapons, less chance for nuts to get one. Geez, this stuff ought to be easy to grasp, Buzz, it really should.

Re: SANDY HOOK FATHER OWNS CONGRESS

Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2013 8:13 pm
by Pudfark
Grasp this concept Slick.
Leave legitimate gun owners alone.
Go after mental cases and criminals.
Mental cases should be easy...remember, we have ObamaCare.
Criminals are easy...they have a documented history.
Why do you advocate doing things the hard way?

Re: SANDY HOOK FATHER OWNS CONGRESS

Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2013 8:20 pm
by Reservoir_Dog
Pudfark wrote:Go after mental cases and criminals.
Mental cases should be easy...remember, we have ObamaCare.
I thought you didn't want them to take your guns! :lol:

Re: SANDY HOOK FATHER OWNS CONGRESS

Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2013 8:31 pm
by Pudfark
There ya go being silly again...R_D

I just don't want them to try....it'd be messy and unnecessary.

Re: SANDY HOOK FATHER OWNS CONGRESS

Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2013 8:42 pm
by Reservoir_Dog
Pudfark wrote:I just don't want them to try....it'd be messy and unnecessary.
Why? What would you do?