This is the reasonable path to a permanent solution

[Pudfark]

Here in Texas, cops have discretion with a "Class C Misdemeanor".
Meaning, it's punishable by a fine first, and then jail time second.
What you allude to 1mph...falls into that category.

However, if that's your total take on the subject...
Then you have to agree...that it should extrapolate to let'n murders go, as well.

Good discussion, so far....If I had seen things your way?
I could'a finished a lot more coffee and donuts.

[Buzz]

You missed the point I was making completely.

Your murder comment shows that.

[Pudfark]

No Buzz, I didn't miss yer point.
No more than you missed mine.

You went to one side of the "pendulum" and I went to the other.
Some where in the middle is some common sense.
The why of the common sense is called discretion.
Do you have discretion and can you apply it?
I think so.
You just like to argue...

[Buzz]

Actually, I hate to argue. You just like to disagree with everything.

My point is some things aren't worth the trouble to bother with. Even if it's the law. It's been going on forever, and i'm not sure why to choose to jump on Obama for what's been going on forever.

What would you have us do about it? Lynch Obama?

We have a lot more important things to worry about it this country than a few pot heads.

[Pudfark]

It ain't about the pot.
It's about the concept, duty to follow the law and enforce it or change it.
Ya can't lawfully, ignore it.

The law has been ignored.
Does that make it right?
Legally?

Sorta like knowing the difference between a precedent and a tort.
If ya don't know the difference, ya can't argue it.
Now you could offer a mitigating circumstance, though that won't work either.
There are precedents where on every occasion Federal Law trumps State Laws.
Meaning...the states have no right to mandate to the Federal Government that the
feds have to follow their laws, nor can the states laws be less restrictive than the fed laws...Which, by the way, both Colorado and Washington have done and are going to get away with it because of Obama's personal desire. Not because of any interpretation of any prior precedent. Further meaning, that on Obama's whim, the law ain't gonna be enforced. That there whim, is a huge mistake/problem and is illegal under our constitution, as I see it/know it to be.

[Buzz]

You're being naive.

Do you really think this is totally Obama's decision?

[Pudfark]

You're being naive.

Do you really think this is totally Obama's decision?

Well, are you calling Obama a liar?
Seems to me you are.
Cuz, the words came out of his mouth, not mine.
So the question is?
Do you believe in what Obama says?

I does believe you are naive.
I done told you he said it, earlier.
Google is your friend too.

Now I could understand yer tact/tack...If you truly believe?
That the POTUS is not Responsible or Accountable to any one.

Well?

[Buzz]

So, you think all of Obama's decision are his alone? LOL

[Buzz]

Before you think i'm on Obama's side. Remember I didn't vote for him. He's a clown who can't make decisions. (less of a clown than Romney though) He can check boxes though.

Read.

http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/02/ ... sions.html

[Pudfark]

So, you think all of Obama's decision are his alone? LOL

I know that he accepted Responsibility for All decisions made by himself and his appointments. I know that our Constitution holds him to it. I know you and about half this countries population don't. Therein lies the crux of the problem. Y'all just "blow" everything off and here we are. Everything going to shit. Hell, Nic can see it. I believe Fats see's it too. HH see's it. You say, words to the effect, you don't.

It's like a noise in the dark....you're scared, so you say it's nothing and do nothing.
I say, something made that noise, irrefutably. I'm gonna take a look. What I see, I don't like. I tell you and....you don't wanna hear it. You say your not responsible and therefore, nobody is. I know yer wrong. You know it too.