A Complete Waste of Space

oh, I understand just fine, Pud......what you're seeing out of me is a mix of bored amusement(ie: the amusement value of insensitive stupidity and bad writing style is wearing thin) and acceptance that you are just incapable of thinking about these topics with any level of insight or depth. In other words, you don't wish to debate the pluses and minuses, you just wish to make cheap shots at anything you deem 'liberal', or 'Obama-related', and then change the subject when challenged with facts.

What is so difficult to understand about?
Less Spending?
vs
More Borrowing?

Then ya add this to that above...

Paying.
Who
How
When
Something you and yours have never addressed and never intended to address.

Here we are at sequestration, brought on by you.
It's a contract whose terms and conditions were defined by you.
I agree, it's not a very good start on the problem.
I expected more from you. So, how's about doubling it?

Pudfark wrote:What is so difficult to understand about?
Less Spending?
vs
More Borrowing?

there's your problem, in a nutshell. You think that running a government is this simple. It isn't.

Then ya add this to that above...

Paying.
Who
How
When
Something you and yours have never addressed and never intended to address.

tough to address gibberish. Put that into intelligent question format, and maybe I will, if you haven't bored me to tears with sheer stupidity.

Here we are at sequestration, brought on by you.

how did I do this?

It's a contract whose terms and conditions were defined by you.

you apparently think I am a Congressman or Senator, or work in the Exec branch. How, again, did I define these?

I agree, it's not a very good start on the problem.
I expected more from you. So, how's about doubling it?

How's about making sensible English sentences?
[/quote]

Here ya go Slick......

When I say "you"?
I'm addressing the dingle berry on Obama's butthole.
Which means? Him and You.

So, let's double up on the sequestration.
You college boys can afford it.
I can too.

callmeslick wrote:

Pudfark wrote:What is so difficult to understand about?
Less Spending?
vs
More Borrowing?

there's your problem, in a nutshell. You think that running a government is this simple. It isn't.

Then ya add this to that above...

Paying.
Who
How
When
Something you and yours have never addressed and never intended to address.

tough to address gibberish. Put that into intelligent question format, and maybe I will, if you haven't bored me to tears with sheer stupidity.

Here we are at sequestration, brought on by you.

how did I do this?

It's a contract whose terms and conditions were defined by you.

you apparently think I am a Congressman or Senator, or work in the Exec branch. How, again, did I define these?

I agree, it's not a very good start on the problem.
I expected more from you. So, how's about doubling it?

How's about making sensible English sentences?

[/quote]

Running a government is simple.
When it's done honestly.

Complexity comes into play?
When dishonesty is present.

I had a whole bunch of years in the government.
How many did you have?

That's right....You're the self serving college boy who knows it all...

Pudfark wrote:Here ya go Slick......

When I say "you"?
I'm addressing the dingle berry on Obama's butthole.
Which means? Him and You.

I just vote and give money, work a phone bank every now and then. I don't make policy.

So, let's double up on the sequestration.
You college boys can afford it.
I can too.

and who cares who gets hurt by it? I see, Buzz has you pegged perfectly.

callmeslick wrote:

Pudfark wrote:Here ya go Slick......

When I say "you"?
I'm addressing the dingle berry on Obama's butthole.
Which means? Him and You.

I just vote and give money, work a phone bank every now and then. I don't make policy.

So, let's double up on the sequestration.
You college boys can afford it.
I can too.

and who cares who gets hurt by it? I see, Buzz has you pegged perfectly.

Glad to hear it. It's not difficult to understand me. I speak clearly and precisely.
By the way? Who has been harmed by sequestration other than the reputations of Chicken Little and the boys who cried wolf?

you're three days into sequestration, and want to know who has been harmed yet? Good to see you haven't started to think......

You're the Demwit who said "who cares who gets hurt by it"....
So...like whose Obama gonna choose?
Then you'll know who. If ya get the memo.

Pretty much it seems you and Buzz are still in panic mode.
There's help available for that...though, where you are?
They may take away yer goose gun.