A Complete Waste of Space

Pudfark wrote:You don't have exact thoughts, you have baseless, fact less innuendo which you
present....much like a monkey does his turd.

That's pretty funny coming from the world heavyweight champion of copy and paste. (who gets 99.9 percent of his information from one completely bias source. And then simply regurgitates it.)

Reservoir_Dog wrote: Reservoir_Dog simply regurgitates here.

Fixed.

it's pretty funny to see that most Americans(note:MOST, and certainly not only 'liberal' citizens)see this whole thing for what it truly is. Benghazi investigations in the House aren't out to seek 'truth', or 'solutions' to any policy problems. They are a transparent, lame and ultimately futile attempt to slow down Hillary Clinton's 2016 momentum. Lotsa luck on that.

Nice try defending a liar slick.but youve been doing it since obama was elected so why should I expect any less

Besides I think you're scared. I think you know that she blew whatever chance she had

not the least bit scared....just observing what I see in the real world. My new gig allows me to spend break time with a nice range of professionals(IT, medical,
engineers, chemists, etc) and we have CNN on in the cafeteria and break rooms. The other day, the Benghazi hearings came on, and, nearly to a person, this group of seemingly apolitical types expressed pure disgust at the waste of legislative time. Most viewed it as a clear cut attempt to beat back the inevitable Hillary candidacy. All viewed it as diverting attention from real, long-term economic issues, environmental issues(often economic in impact) and other jobs Congress should be doing. All viewed it as first-rate political grandstanding. None had, to that moment, or at any time since, ever expressed any partisan political leaning, nor any real interest in politics. That sort of response, to me, is sort of telling, given that I saw it out of a smallish(12-15 person) cross-section of well-educated fellow citizens.
I suppose you and likeminded types would just dismiss such people as 'sheep', 'liberal-leaning' or whatever, but, the bottom line is this: these people ARE YOUR FELLOW CITIZENS. And further, those fellow citizens have been saying for a while now that they are sick of the manufactured, silly, 'issues' that seem to resonate only with extreme conservatives. Please, factor the effects of the Benghazi thing in and then find me one GOP candidate that could both win the primary and beat Hillary. Go ahead and try.

interestingly I noticed that you did not deny that Hillary lied.

“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State."

Joseph Goebbels

CUDA wrote:interestingly I noticed that you did not deny that Hillary lied.

“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State."

Joseph Goebbels

Thanks CUDA, I was recently looking for that quote, or one like it.
Joseph Goebbels would be proud of modern "Democrats"

HH

hell, the Republican committee hasn't shown one instance of Hillary lying. Why should I disagree?

it always amuses me when knee-jerk right wingers trot out the Goebbels quote re:repeating lies. Essentially, the entire premise behind Fox News, Brietbart,
Rush, Beck and virtually every other rightie site I've ever read is to repeat lies, at loud volume, hoping they stick. Hilarious to see them accuse others of anything remotely approaching the skillset they've mastered. Darn shame, isn't it, that the general populace isn't buying that old Tea Party snakeoil any longer?








.....as Soapy goes, so do I. Adios.

I could honestly say "don't let the door hit you in the ass" but we all know the real reason.
Bengahzi and the IRS harassment of conservative groups are exposing you Joseph Goebbels
wannabes for what you really are.

read this little EXPLOSIVE jewel from CNN
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/20 ... ?hpt=hp_t2

CNN has finally joined the band wagon!

No Hillary in 2016, she will retire.

Devall Patrick (Devall Deville) will be the candidate, and he will be demolished.

HH

callmeslick wrote:hell, the Republican committee hasn't shown one instance of Hillary lying. Why should I disagree?

it always amuses me when knee-jerk right wingers trot out the Goebbels quote re:repeating lies. Essentially, the entire premise behind Fox News, Brietbart,
Rush, Beck and virtually every other rightie site I've ever read is to repeat lies, at loud volume, hoping they stick. Hilarious to see them accuse others of anything remotely approaching the skillset they've mastered. Darn shame, isn't it, that the general populace isn't buying that old Tea Party snakeoil any longer?








.....as Soapy goes, so do I. Adios.

Yup..it's been my professional experience, when the "Truth catches up to You", folks cut and run. No Surprise Here. It was predictable and expected. You're just running early.

It's been a hoot and a giggle, Slick. Perhaps, some day, you'll come back...maybe a name change? How's about "fly paper".