Page 3 of 4

Re: White House Job Applicant's (short list)

Posted: Sat May 04, 2013 5:38 am
by CUDA
Its easy to spew shit without proof, and if you do it enough some people will believe it. Much like I said about MSNBC.
What slick fails to remember. His accusation, his burdon of proof.
It not my responsability to research and back up his post. And posting things in that manner just as well be posting a lie. He ASSumes that I havent looked it up already. I had, but I wanted to see what kind of left wing bullshit he was going to post this time.

Its just too damn bad that he's "too busy" to back up his assertions. The real world calls that bearing false witness.

He constantly does it with the hopes that some fool will believe it. Lets just throw shit up against the wall and see what sticks

Re: White House Job Applicant's (short list)

Posted: Sat May 04, 2013 5:41 am
by CUDA
fatman wrote:
callmeslick wrote: hardly the case, Fats. Actually,
Hardly that case Slick leave fraud aside for the momemnt infact if fraud is invlolved ites even worse but 52% total turnout there is no majority gov

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voter_turn ... _elections
Wow a post backed up with evidence. Imagine that.

Fats HOW DID YOU FIND THE TIME?

Re: White House Job Applicant's (short list)

Posted: Sat May 04, 2013 6:39 am
by HappyHappy
Joseph Goebbles is so proud of Callmesick.
Callmeshit it using a minor stolen majority to
make a last desperate attempt to disarm the people.
This is his chance. A last chance to consolidate power
and establish a dictatorship of the proletariat.
Imagine the glory of having the puppet Obama regime with absolute
power with Nancy Pelosi and Dianne Feinstein calling the shots.
Pure bliss.


HH

Re: White House Job Applicant's (short list)

Posted: Sat May 04, 2013 7:26 am
by callmeslick
CUDA wrote:Its easy to spew shit without proof, and if you do it enough some people will believe it. Much like I said about MSNBC.
What slick fails to remember. His accusation, his burdon of proof.
It not my responsability to research and back up his post. And posting things in that manner just as well be posting a lie. He ASSumes that I havent looked it up already. I had, but I wanted to see what kind of left wing bullshit he was going to post this time.

Its just too damn bad that he's "too busy" to back up his assertions. The real world calls that bearing false witness.

He constantly does it with the hopes that some fool will believe it. Lets just throw shit up against the wall and see what sticks

so sayeth the fellow tossing around bogus Founding Father quotes like candy at the Halloween parade.

Re: White House Job Applicant's (short list)

Posted: Sat May 04, 2013 7:28 am
by callmeslick
CUDA wrote:
fatman wrote:
callmeslick wrote: hardly the case, Fats. Actually,
Hardly that case Slick leave fraud aside for the momemnt infact if fraud is invlolved ites even worse but 52% total turnout there is no majority gov

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voter_turn ... _elections
Wow a post backed up with evidence. Imagine that.

Fats HOW DID YOU FIND THE TIME?

and, Fats makes a valid point about US turnout, which explains much of our political problems....right and left. However, it might be worth noting that the turnout during Obama's two victories was pretty good in comparison to other recent elections.

Re: White House Job Applicant's (short list)

Posted: Sat May 04, 2013 8:16 am
by Pudfark
HappyHappy wrote:Joseph Goebbles is so proud of Callmesick.
Callmeshit it using a minor stolen majority to
make a last desperate attempt to disarm the people.
This is his chance. A last chance to consolidate power
and establish a dictatorship of the proletariat.
Imagine the glory of having the puppet Obama regime with absolute
power with Nancy Pelosi and Dianne Feinstein calling the shots.
Pure bliss.


HH

Much truth to the above. The "house of cards" is in jeopardy.
Seems at the moment, Obama is just trying to hold on until
2014 and the elections. Even Slick would have to admit....
Obama pissed away his first two years in office. It is as you
called it HH "desperation".

What I sorta like earlier from Slick was the "childs argument/excuse" concerning voter fraud and how everybody does it, so it's ok. Never once entertaining the thought? That the results of that "election" are fraudulent and certainly not binding on anybody. No matter how much he whines about it. Then old Slick has the gall to flaunt the percentages from that illegal election to substantiate and further additional illegal activity. Then..to add insult to his argument, Slick calls others unamerican.

So, yeah HH I see your point. :)

Old Pudfark sez: " The "Fraudulent 53%...the New Super Majority... "

Re: White House Job Applicant's (short list)

Posted: Sat May 04, 2013 9:38 am
by CUDA
callmeslick wrote:
CUDA wrote:Its easy to spew shit without proof, and if you do it enough some people will believe it. Much like I said about MSNBC.
What slick fails to remember. His accusation, his burdon of proof.
It not my responsability to research and back up his post. And posting things in that manner just as well be posting a lie. He ASSumes that I havent looked it up already. I had, but I wanted to see what kind of left wing bullshit he was going to post this time.

Its just too damn bad that he's "too busy" to back up his assertions. The real world calls that bearing false witness.

He constantly does it with the hopes that some fool will believe it. Lets just throw shit up against the wall and see what sticks

so sayeth the fellow tossing around bogus Founding Father quotes like candy at the Halloween parade.
Yes so sayeth the man that attributed the quote to the wrong person. SUE ME. And then got personaly attacked by the man that in typical fashion totally ignored the premise of the quote and went straight to trying to discredit the poster, hoping that no one would notice that he dodged the issue. Thats your MO cant argue the point attack the poster, fling shit don't back it up. Call people hater because you're afraid of criticism. You choose to run from the topic instead of facing it.

Hey I noticed you had more time to post, have you found time to back up your statement yet?

Re: White House Job Applicant's (short list)

Posted: Sat May 04, 2013 10:25 am
by Pudfark
Here's a timely little quote from Slick.. "I'd never 'ignore' CUDA or anyone, but............" posted on March 28, 2013.... ;)

Old Pudfark sez: " Normally, after the "but", comes the turd.... ;) "

Re: White House Job Applicant's (short list)

Posted: Sat May 04, 2013 6:11 pm
by Reservoir_Dog
Pudfark wrote:Here's a timely little quote from Slick.. "I'd never 'ignore' CUDA or anyone, but............" posted on March 28, 2013.... ;)

Old Pudfark sez: " Normally, after the "but", comes the turd.... ;) "
:roll: You're an idiot.

Re: White House Job Applicant's (short list)

Posted: Sat May 04, 2013 6:46 pm
by HappyHappy
Reservoir_Dog wrote: I am an idiot


Fixed.

HH