Page 3 of 3
Re: Obama on Syria:
Posted: Thu Sep 12, 2013 5:09 pm
by nicolas10
IIRC I posted a zerohedge link that pretty much said the same thing.
Nic
Re: Obama on Syria:
Posted: Fri Sep 13, 2013 4:10 am
by Pudfark
nicolas10 wrote:IIRC I posted a zerohedge link that pretty much said the same thing.
Nic
Forgive me Nic.....por CACA dos veces?

Re: Obama on Syria:
Posted: Fri Sep 13, 2013 2:45 pm
by nicolas10
I don't speak spanish. Hence I can't be admitted in the US
Nic
Re: Obama on Syria:
Posted: Fri Sep 13, 2013 4:03 pm
by Pudfark
nicolas10 wrote:I don't speak spanish. Hence I can't be admitted in the US
Nic
nicolas10 wrote:I don't speak spanish. Hence I can't be
assimilated in the US
Nic
Fixed 
Re: Obama on Syria:
Posted: Sat Sep 14, 2013 12:08 pm
by callmeslick
just read an amusing observation:" When Barack Obama deals with Syria by invading the wrong country and then giving 39 Billion dollars to Joe Biden's old company, then we can start comparing this to Iraq...."
Re: Obama on Syria:
Posted: Sat Sep 14, 2013 1:30 pm
by HappyHappy
callmeslick wrote:just read an amusing observation:" When Barack Obama deals with Syria by invading the wrong country and then giving 39 Billion dollars to Joe Biden's old company, then we can start comparing this to Iraq...."
I find it amusing when Obama was crushed under Putin's heel so quickly!
Obama has proven himself a weak sister, a pussy yet again.
HH
Re: Obama on Syria:
Posted: Sat Sep 14, 2013 1:49 pm
by Pudfark
I see it as this.....Putin has proven, yet again, ya can pound a square peg into a round hole/whole/asshole. This current very dangerous nonsense in Syria is proof.
The idea? The "new agreement" in Syria is a total farce. Why? Well, it buys time for Assad, changes nothing there for nobody there, Russia keeps it's military bases and influence in the region and once again throw's the responsibility back to the U.N. Security Council to enforce it. It won't work. Why? Because China will veto any military action should it be proposed. Why would China oppose it? Simples, China wasn't made a part of the "new plan" and they are a "player" in it. Meaning? China will veto military action when Assad runs out of time next summer because they were dissed by the U.S. and Russia.
This ain't no complex issue. It's the per usual "bait&switch" and "smoke&mirrors" distraction technique the Obama Administration is known for and the Russians are being allowed to take advantage of and all of it to save Obama's worthless ass and all the while.....Putin is forcing Obama to take a ride on his "baloney pony".
That's it....in a "Russian nut sack".
Old Pudfark sez: " Yup, another fine example of the Obama Administration Foreign Policy....gone viral and stickey".
Re: Obama on Syria:
Posted: Sat Sep 14, 2013 2:41 pm
by Barfly
They'll have to think of another distraction to keep peoples eyes off the ongoing and worsening increased-government-intervention in health care debacle.
Re: Obama on Syria:
Posted: Sat Sep 14, 2013 2:59 pm
by Pudfark
Yup.
It seems the only folks advocating ACA (Awe Caca Act) are folks not included/not affected by it, the "politicians" and Slick. Everybody else gets the "rectal exam" and then, the promise of a doctor visit.
