Page 3 of 3

Re: How is this for weird..

Posted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 6:47 pm
by Soapy
Pudfark wrote:Soapy had no control over his ancestry...and I don't fault him for that...they do...

It may be a good thing, that Soapy has his kids around to take care of him....I hope they care as much as I do....

Soapy..it must bring you much comfort...to have Slick as your "friend with benefits"....

Old Pudfark sez: "When ya's to old to ass kick....use a shotgun"
I read the above several times, but, all I get from it is the sound of a weak wet fart ripping through some female panties...Do you speak or type in any other language apart from bullshit?

Re: How is this for weird..

Posted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 7:27 pm
by callmeslick
Soapy wrote:I've had some disagreements with most of you, but never thought any less of anyone for having an opinion, no matter how contentious it was.
extraordinarily well put, Soapy. I would safely say the same, both here and elsewhere. For example, I've gone back and forth, often fiercely over the past 6 years, with Ruggie. Never, however, has he lost my respect as a man, as he generally attempts to back up his points, invariably states them in plain English, but most importantly, has been willing to show himself, at times, to be a real person, with real feelings. Never do I recall him ever bringing someone's family heritage into it. In fact, in all my interactions on the web, I've only come across a small handful that low, and they all received the same level of disdain I now hold for Pudface.

Re: How is this for weird..

Posted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 7:41 pm
by nuf
Yeah i thought i´ve allready met the biggest cunt on the internet but fuckfart, also maybe slighty smarter (but still super retarded) he gets pretty close to being a bigger twat than the other guy.

Congrats to that, fuckfart :mrgreen:


btw, first i thought he was a troll but you never know how dumb people can get. he´s too hard to understand to be taken seriously anyway.

Re: How is this for weird..

Posted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 7:54 pm
by callmeslick
sadly, nuf, if you want to venture onto Usenet, I can find you some folks equally bad. Usually, the first sign of a problem is consistent bad sentence structure and spelling, sometimes lapsing into obscene tirades. I mean, all of us fuck up the language, but the true cretins manage to mangle it regularly, and with seeming pride. Then, when their specious argument, on whatever their pet subject is, falls to shit, they spiral out of control. Eventually, they just post replies to their own threads, even when others don't participate. It's sort of sad to see, actually. Still, if one maintains the proper frame of mind, hilarity can ensue! :)

Re: How is this for weird..

Posted: Wed Jan 27, 2010 12:46 am
by Quasar-NL
oFZo wrote:
ruggbutt wrote:Simmer down wooden clog boy.
Hey! Don't insult his (our) ancestry! :lol:
Woot, good to see you are still alive oFZo <3

:D

Re: How is this for weird..

Posted: Wed Jan 27, 2010 8:30 am
by fatman
Quasar-NL wrote:
oFZo wrote:
ruggbutt wrote:Simmer down wooden clog boy.
Hey! Don't insult his (our) ancestry! :lol:
Woot, good to see you are still alive oFZo <3

:D
Hey precious ;)

Re: How is this for weird..

Posted: Thu Jan 28, 2010 12:11 am
by Quasar-NL
fatman wrote:
Hey precious ;)
Hello honey :P

"You may embed only 3 quotes within each other." :shock:

No multiquote mania :(

Re: How is this for weird..

Posted: Thu Jan 28, 2010 7:30 am
by fatman
Thats ok dude we only need each other and well we cant leave Nufo out so 3 it is 8-)

Re: How is this for weird..

Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 2:01 am
by Pudfark
I speak American.....not english....

You Soapster, speak english...the difference?......we kicked them out two hundred years ago....and you've been letting them hump yer hind end for the last two hundred....

And you go around threatening to kick folks ass....that's as funny as Slick doing the same....ooooh, a couple of "progressive savages".....ooooh....... :lol:

Old Pudfark sez: "You two make quite the couple....not a pair between ya"