well, look here, another one for Canadians to chuckle at...

Pudfark

Re: well, look here, another one for Canadians to chuckle at

Post by Pudfark »

HappyHappy wrote:The answer is easy, the festering imbeciles Commieshit and Bloomberg
hate freedom and will use any propaganda to disarm honest people.

Remember what happens when no one is armed?

Norway?.....

Canada got spanked recently (still laughing!)

Bloomberg is an utter idiot, a hater of all that is free.
A Jewish fascist, more like a NAZI than not.

If not for lies the Libtards would have little to talk about.

HH
True that HH.

Old Pudfark sez: " If'n yer a drooling liberal and yer absent facts? Just make'm up and throw'm out there....anyway. Ya know, like Slick does. "
User avatar
callmeslick
Posts: 16473
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:02 pm
Location: Fearing and loathing in Delaware and Virginia.

Re: well, look here, another one for Canadians to chuckle at

Post by callmeslick »

well, Slick knows enough to know that Canada isn't 'unarmed'(per capita gun ownership exceeds US, but so does the level of regulation). :roll:
Pudfark wrote: Mon May 29, 2017 11:15 am I live in Texas....you live in America.
User avatar
Reservoir_Dog
Posts: 8858
Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 3:46 pm
Location: Kicking and a' gouging in the mud and the blood and the beer.

Re: well, look here, another one for Canadians to chuckle at

Post by Reservoir_Dog »

callmeslick wrote:well, Slick knows enough to know that Canada isn't 'unarmed'(per capita gun ownership exceeds US, but so does the level of regulation). :roll:
Yup.
We have shit loads of guns up here. We aren't 'unarmed' by any sense of the imagination. The average Canadian is absolutely entitled to own a gun if he or she wants to. Easily, about a third of the people I know own guns.
The difference is, as Canadians, we're not completely stupid about gun ownership.

Pudman and Nappy-Boy just don't what the fuck they're talking about.
Fact.
Pudfark

Re: well, look here, another one for Canadians to chuckle at

Post by Pudfark »

callmeslick wrote:well, Slick knows enough to know that Canada isn't 'unarmed'(per capita gun ownership exceeds US, but so does the level of regulation). :roll:
Really? "exceeds US"? Where'd ya pull that little piece of crap info from?

Read this below...and tell us how you came up with that there declaration above?
http://www.rcmp-grc.gc.ca/cfp-pcaf/onli ... nr-eng.htm
This states all person's in possession of a fire arm must have a license. It also states
that Canada pretty much gave up on long gun registration.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Number_of_ ... by_country
"Despite concerns that it contains systematic errors, the Small Arms Survey 2007,[3] provides an estimate of the total number of known civilian-owned guns in a country per 100 people of that country."

Then, ya factor in that the majority of "old guns" in the US, those manufactured/imported/sold prior to 1968, when registration was not a requirement and I ask you again.... Where'd ya pull that little piece of crap info from?

Well?
User avatar
callmeslick
Posts: 16473
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:02 pm
Location: Fearing and loathing in Delaware and Virginia.

Re: well, look here, another one for Canadians to chuckle at

Post by callmeslick »

Well, this article states, and cites data, that Canadian per capita long gun ownership is CLOSE to that of the US
http://www.guncite.com/journals/dkcgc.html

. Was trying to find an older set of figures that showed PERCENTAGE of the Canadian population which owns firearms, and it exceeds the US. So, if you look at sheer total numbers, the US wins, because we are more likely to have persons owning lots of guns(as Pud cites-legacy stuff, etc, along with more recent purchases), but Canada finds gun ownership a bit more common than in the US overall.
Pudfark wrote: Mon May 29, 2017 11:15 am I live in Texas....you live in America.
Pudfark

Re: well, look here, another one for Canadians to chuckle at

Post by Pudfark »

I don't see anything in the link you provided supporting what you stated.
I don't see any numbers in it either or a process to calculate them.

Nobody can calculate that. The reason's I mentioned and you called "legacy", is the why of that.
Post Reply