Billary for President?????

[callmeslick]

if there was an Olympic Event for Backpeddling, you just qualified, Pud.....

[callmeslick]

You Libtards will lose your precious EBT cards

HH

that's funny! I likely made more money this afternoon than you will see in your entire life. EBT!! w00t!

[Pudfark]

Res is right, you ARE stupid. Since when does the Wall Street Journal publish polls of one state's opinion on national issues?
oh, and Res, in regards to your observation.
My dog is brighter, and I'm the first to admit, the dog isn't all that bright......













then again, he eats well, sleeps in climate controlled conditions on my mattress, hasn't worked a day in his life and has a membership to an Australian Football team, so maybe the dog is brighter than I give him credit for. Not so much so, Pud....

Here ya go dummy....your laughable supporting info came from an article in the Washington Post....not the link you posted from the UK. Yer a lyin' ass wipe. Two totally different sources and you posted one link and claim they're the same. Good job Slick, everybody can see you "checked yer facts" and chose to deliberately falsely post them.

If'n ya like...I can do a little cut n pastey, prove it and shove my words above, six feet up'n yer tail pipe.

I meeting my squad on Insurgency now...so you'll have to wait a bit....for the pain.

[Pudfark]

Slick....ya might wanna "cough", first....this is gonna hurt.

Here's your only link to your statements and idiotic rebuttal.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... years.html

Here's the contents of that link in it's entirety:

MailOnline - news, sport, celebrity, science and health stories
Home
U.K.

News
Sports
U.S. Showbiz
Australia
Femail
Health
Science
Money
Video
Travel
Columnists
News Home
Arts
Headlines
Pictures
Most read
News Board
Wires


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... z34uWKeQYm
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Poll finds Bill Clinton by far the most admired U.S. president of the last 25 years
Clinton took 42 per cent of the vote in poll among more than 1,000 Americans
Barack Obama named second at 18 per cent, followed by George W. Bush at 17 per cent and George H.W. Bush at 16 per cent
By DAILY MAIL REPORTER
PUBLISHED: 11:02 EST, 15 June 2014 | UPDATED: 12:42 EST, 15 June 2014

A new poll says Bill Clinton is the most admired president of the last 25 years by a wide margin.
In a Wall Street Journal/NBC News/Annenberg Survey Clinton was named most admired by 42 per cent of respondents.

Coming in second with 18 per cent was Barack Obama, followed by George W. Bush at 17 per cent and George H.W. Bush at 16 per cent.

Former President Bill Clinton was named most admired president of the last 25 years by 42 per cent of recent poll respondents


Former President Bill Clinton was named most admired president of the last 25 years by 42 per cent of recent poll respondents

FILE - In this May 27, 2014, file photo President Barack Obama speaks about the future of US troops in Afghanistan at the White House in Washington. Obama stood in the Rose Garden and outlined a timetable for the gradual withdrawal of the last U.S. troops in Afghanistan. He confidently declared, "This is how wars end in the 21st century." But less than three weeks later, there is a sudden burst of uncertainty surrounding the way Obama has moved to bring the two conflicts he inherited to a close. In Iraq, a fast-moving Islamic insurgency is pressing toward Baghdad, raising the possibility of fresh American military action more than two years after the last U.S. troops withdrew. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh, File)

US President George Bush is greeted by Pope John Paul II upon their meeting in his private library at the Vatican, Friday, June 4, 2004. Bush is in Italy for 36 hours to mark the 60th anniversary of Rome's liberation and meet the Pope and Italian leaders. In the background is Vatican Secretary of State Cardinal Angelo Sodano. (AP Photo/Osservatore Romano, ho)

Following behind Clinton in the poll were current president Barack Obama at 18 per cent and George W. Bush at 17 per cent

The Wall Street Journal reports that 1,238 adults responded to the poll from June 2-8.

More...
Blair: Don't blame me for meltdown in Iraq: Astonishing 'essay' by ex-PM: he says Obama quit too soon... and the UK should launch attacks
The First Lady of news? Katie Couric 'compared herself to Hillary Clinton when disgruntled CBS employees gave her the cold shoulder after $15m-a-year move
There is a margin of error of plus or minus 2.8 per cent.
The Wall Street Journal noted that the poll results were a reflection of how much Clinton had done to polish his image since leaving the White House in 2000.
The survey is part of a series of polls done as a collaboration between the news organizations and the Annenberg Public Policy Center, based at the University of Pennsylvania.
The poll is the latest evidence that the Clinton's are America's most popular political figures at the moment.
That poll along with one supporting Hillary Clinton in a 2016 presidential bid indicate the Clintons are America's most popular political couple

That poll along with one supporting Hillary Clinton in a 2016 presidential bid indicate the Clintons are America's most popular political couple
A poll released in May showed that 55 per cent of responders said they would vote for Hillary Clinton as presidential candidate in 2016, the Washington Post reports.
Her support is even higher than Obama's current approval ratings.
Bill Clinton's potential as First Husband seems to help. The Washington Post reported at the time of the survey that his positive ratings were now the best they'd been since the early days of his presidency in the 90s.

Read more:
The Clintons. So hot right now.

This is an entirely different link that Slick tried to cover his ass with:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the ... right-now/

Here's the contents of that link in it's entirety:


The Washington Post

The Clintons. So hot right now.

BY SCOTT CLEMENT May 28

Hillary and Bill Clinton are two of the most popular political figures in the country, according to a new Washington Post-ABC News poll, a finding that comes as speculation about the former Secretary of State's political future reaches a fever pitch.

Hillary Clinton is more popular than any potential 2016 rival. (Linda Davidson/Washington Post)
Fifty five percent of respondents say they would support Hillary Clinton as a candidate for president in 2016. More than six in ten approve of Bill Clinton, near the highest ratings he has ever received in Post-ABC polling.

Hillary Clinton's potential support rides well above President Obama's latest job ratings. In an April Post-ABC national poll, Obama marked his lowest approval rating at 41 percent, 14 percentage points below Clinton's potential support in the new poll. Even more notable than that overall gap between Hillary and Obama are the big differences among some key demographic groups.

At 61 percent, women are far more supportive of Hillary Clinton than the 44 percent of women who approved of Obama in April. Crucially, 50 percent of whites and 51 percent of senior citizens say they would support her as a candidate; Obama's job approval stood at just 32 percent among whites and 42 percent among seniors last month.

Clinton is unlikely to garner such wide support if she runs in 2016 given the nation's close partisan division in elections; she has seen her personal popularity diminish after leaving her position as Secretary of State.

Having Bill Clinton at her side is a positive factor as well. At 63 percent favorable to 32 percent unfavorable, his 2-1 positive ratings are the best they have been since early in his presidency over two decades ago, and mark a clear turnaround since the 2008 election battle. Amid the Democratic primary pitting Barack Obama against his wife, Bill Clinton's ratings dipped to 47 percent favorable to 51 percent unfavorable, sagging among Democrats and Republicans alike from their heights.

Clinton's political recovery began with a full-throated endorsement of Obama during the 2008 Democratic National Convention. He now enjoys wide popularity among Democrats (87 percent favorable) and independents (60 percent), with substantial positive reviews among Republicans too (37 percent). Since April 2008, Clinton has seen a big rebound in positive ratings among non-whites and independents, with a rise of 19 and 18 percentage points in favorable ratings for each group, respectively.

The Post-ABC poll was conducted May 21 to 25 among a random national sample of 1,017 adults, including users of conventional and cellular phones. Results from the full survey have a margin of error of plus or minus 3.5 percentage points.

So:

You mixed the results of two separate polls, from two separate articles and from two different entities...co-mingled the results, chose to present it as a fact and deliberately lied. So, there's yer butthurt and proof.
Where's the apology?

[Pudfark]

Well, Slick... I see you were recently on and posting in another thread, instead of addressing this one.

So, in light of my post above and recent world events...the below seems more than applicable.

[Reservoir_Dog]

So where is this Washington Post link that Slick put up to "cover his ass"?
Because it sure as shit ain't in this thread.

[Pudfark]

here ya go R_D...since ya ain't very bright lately.....go to the link slick posted http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... years.html Go all the way close to the bottom of the page displayed and look for this The Clintons. So hot right now. click on that red hyper link from with in Slicks posted link and it will take you to http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the ... right-now/ Now note the words highlighted in Slick's quote below. Can ya figure it out now? Or do ya need some more help...like maybe, me mowing yer yard, taking out the trash or hosing yer girl friend?

I hate to steal Res' material, but GOD, YOU ARE AN IDIOT! The poll was conducted BY the U of Pennsylvania, along with others, as the article states. The folks questioned, if you go to the source linking, were taken from across the nation, with standard demographic poll processes. In other words, a VERY scientifc poll, with a margin of error less than 3%(stated in the original article).

In other words, it was clearly NOT a poll limited to Pennsylvanians, you would have known, Pud, IF YOU COULD JUST READ.

Now, R_D....ya know why Slick ain't been back to defend his lies. Cuz, he can't.

This here below seems to be very applicable to you both:

[callmeslick]

but, Pud, that wasn't the poll I was referring to, nor was it the one referred to in the main article. The results of whatever poll you are linking to might be the same, but might be different. The point is, I was referring to the poll cited in the article, which was a Wall Street Journal Poll, done with the assistance of the Annenberg School of Public Policy at the U of Penn. That was NOT a regional study, nor was it a flawed study, nor was it restricted to residents of PA, or any of the other silly claptrap you railed about.

[Pudfark]

Bull Shit. You know it, I know it and those reading here know it.
R_D "should" know it.

You've been caught...billy clubbed and thrown in the cooler...and what's really funny?
You insisted on it.

[Reservoir_Dog]

I read the hyper link, Pud.
And it more or less regurgitates the source article. So what's your bloody point? That the two articles agree with each other?
How is that Slick "covering his ass"?

And for reference sake, here's the hyper link's hyper link. Which completely agrees with the first two articles!
http://www.washingtonpost.com/page/2010 ... se_345.xml