Page 3 of 3

Re: more polling

Posted: Wed Jul 16, 2014 9:18 am
by callmeslick
not true.......sorry Pud.

Re: more polling

Posted: Wed Jul 16, 2014 12:07 pm
by Pudfark
callmeslick wrote:not true.......sorry Pud.
It is true.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dP_fa-FqT_c

Listen and watch the broadcast. 8-)

Do yer own homework from now on. :roll:

Re: more polling

Posted: Wed Jul 16, 2014 1:04 pm
by callmeslick
they've applied for that. Not a done deal, it has to pass government approval. By the way, my provider asked for a 5% average bump. Submissions had to be in by July 15, nothing will be set until Sept 1, no matter what your video states.

Re: more polling

Posted: Wed Jul 16, 2014 1:28 pm
by Pudfark
Let's see now.... I linked ya to the truth and I linked a vid to the actual broadcast to it.

You say it ain't the truth. I say it is. You have no link to anything. But, you say both links are lies.
Then you throw out gibberish and leave.

Sounds like a high school drop out to me...
What's really funny to me?
"it has to pass government approval." If it don't, there won't be any insurance for those folks and/or
they'll have to go completely through the application process again, if they "legally" can/is permissible under ObamaCare at this time ?

Re: more polling

Posted: Wed Jul 16, 2014 1:35 pm
by callmeslick
no one's rates can be(by law) set yet. Sorry. Failed again.

Further, you don't live in New York, so why are you whining about Obamacare again. If 80% of all people still like it this time next year, what will you complain about then?

by the way, and worth noting: the video purports to be about the experience of ONE FAMILY. No details about whether the increase was due to lowered subsidy, or actual policy costs before subsidies. Nothing. I call BS, and it's obvious BS at that.

Re: more polling

Posted: Wed Jul 16, 2014 1:43 pm
by Pudfark
Seems ya forgot about this in the original link. "WHEC stated that the increase is due to the fact that the “bulk” of individuals who signed up through the exchange are “older” and have pre-existing conditions, making them more expensive to cover."

So, ya lying "douche bag" it's affecting far more than one person... :roll:

Re: more polling

Posted: Wed Jul 16, 2014 1:49 pm
by callmeslick
sorry, but the data from around here(my provider, by the way) cite the same factors as raising costs a whopping 2%. You're still flinging BS, and whining about stuff that doesn't even affect you. Why?

Re: more polling

Posted: Wed Jul 16, 2014 2:10 pm
by Pudfark
callmeslick wrote:sorry, but the data from around here(my provider, by the way) cite the same factors as raising costs a whopping 2%. You're still flinging BS, and whining about stuff that doesn't even affect you. Why?
thanx fer sharing yer "data"..... :lol: