Page 3 of 4
Re: game, set, match
Posted: Thu Jun 16, 2016 2:05 pm
by Pudfark
I just wrote this elsewhere...it's applicable here as well.
Dear Demtards,
It ain't 'intelligence', if you don't act on it.

Re: game, set, match
Posted: Thu Jun 16, 2016 4:48 pm
by callmeslick
I'm sure all that wrote it elsewhere had the same response, Pud. Piss off, you're an idiot.
Re: game, set, match
Posted: Thu Jun 16, 2016 7:25 pm
by Reservoir_Dog
Pudfark wrote:I just wrote this elsewhere...it's applicable here as well.
Dear Demtards,
It ain't 'intelligence', if you don't act on it.

Funny. I was just reading that one.
And you didn't say "Dear Demtards". You just said the other line.
But that's to be expected .... honesty ain't yer best quality.
http://www.breitbart.com/national-secur ... thorities/

Re: game, set, match
Posted: Thu Jun 16, 2016 9:01 pm
by Pudfark

Demtards don't read there.....much. Seems you do and that's good. +1
Re: game, set, match
Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2016 2:51 pm
by callmeslick
apparently, the sponsors respect the idea of civil speech:
http://issuehawk.com/eric/2016/06/17/ma ... ntion.html
or, should I say, FORMER sponsors!! Whee, at this rate there will be little extra coverage of this sad spectacle.
Re: game, set, match
Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2016 3:44 pm
by Reservoir_Dog
Re: game, set, match
Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2016 4:27 pm
by callmeslick
Re: game, set, match
Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2016 6:22 pm
by Pudfark
Had body armor...never used it, never hid behind it.
Just so ya know, Slick, body armor ain't like yer 'interweb anonymity'...though, they both do have something in common, head shots....
You just experienced...one.

Re: game, set, match
Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2016 8:00 pm
by callmeslick
you missed, then, with it, apparently.
Re: game, set, match
Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2016 10:02 pm
by Reservoir_Dog