A Complete Waste of Space

callmeslick wrote: preparing and presenting a position paper to a Progressive organization

That sounds as dangerous as dropping the soap at the YMCA....and taking 5 minutes to pick it up.... So, you now, identify with the "Progressives"....Six months ago..you took great offense to that moniker.......and refused to admit it...sounds like you are out of the "closet" now......


Old Pudfark sez: " Probably take another six months for Slick to admit he is a socialist.... "

He'll never admit he secretly loves the cock.

He does seem to have a thing for HH and somebody called rube....could be a progressive "bologna" fetish...

callmeslick wrote:no, give Slick something, anything better to do and he vanishes. In this case, preparing and presenting a position paper to a Progressive organization, challenging them to focus on a few core issues rather than pissing around on 300 or so minor things. Don't worry, I'll come back to laugh at the sorry assed collection that represents 'conservatism' here, and feel sorry for the handful of bright conservatives here that get tarred by the brush of stupidity that HH, the Rube and Ruggie represent. It must hurt you terribly.

this is perhaps the most uninformed, idiotic thing you've posted since claiming to know drug dealers in pakistan or whatever that was
"preparing and presenting a position paper to a Progressive organization" ...amazing

HappyHappy wrote:

idiot

Yes indeed you are Callmesick.

How true

So, you now, identify with the "Progressives"....Six months ago..you took great offense to that moniker.......and refused to admit it...sounds like you are out of the "closet" now......

funny, aint it.
really slick you used to attempt to be a moderate, thinking centrist, and you have slingshotted far off the charts to the left since I've been around.
Perhaps had I not taken a break, I wouldn't have seen this intolerable embrace of stupidity you are now clinging bitterly too...good luck when the world flips, you, and yours will be the first clawing open the latches on the submarine doors trying to escape

callmeslick wrote: Don't worry, I'll come back to laugh at the sorry assed collection that represents 'conservatism' here

Should I mark my calender or set my alarm clock ?

Dawg wrote:this is perhaps the most uninformed, idiotic thing you've posted since claiming to know drug dealers in pakistan or whatever that was
"preparing and presenting a position paper to a Progressive organization" ...amazing

you'll be able to find it on Berks Progress in about 3 months at the rate they catch up with stuff.

So, you now, identify with the "Progressives"....Six months ago..you took great offense to that moniker.......and refused to admit it...sounds like you are out of the "closet" now......

huh? I always have claimed to be a pragmatic progressive. Not in the moronic, Glenn Beck definition, but in the original definition of Progressive, which goes back to the Midwest early in the 20th century.

really slick you used to attempt to be a moderate, thinking centrist, and you have slingshotted far off the charts to the left since I've been around.
Perhaps had I not taken a break, I wouldn't have seen this intolerable embrace of stupidity you are now clinging bitterly too...good luck when the world flips, you, and yours will be the first clawing open the latches on the submarine doors trying to escape

actually, Dawg, I would argue that it is YOU who have hardened your position. Back when I first posted on aCWOS, I espoused such things as Universal Health Care, sensible Immigration policy, and have pointed out for years that the 'conservative' camp is leading to an economy that simply crushes the working man in this country. I cited the unfairness of Bush's tax cuts, the hidden cost to the middle class and the fact that the glowing 2005 era economy in the US was built on a pile of garbage paper. I pointed out that we squandered the chance to effectively deal with Afghanistan and Pakistan in order to focus on Iraq. Not one of these positions have I changed, or would I disavow.
Meanwhile, you have displayed a cartoonish view of the real world economy, no grasp of your own history and keep moving to the loony side of the right(albeit not at the lightning speed Ruggie seems to have travelled at of late).

oh, and Dawg, get your story straight. It was Afghans, specifically Tajik tribesmen. And, maybe you can make stuff up, but I don't. If anyone doubts that the 80's got crazy, just imagine a bunch of Western Educated Muslim freedom-fighters, buying arms from Russian Jews, brokered in Brazil with financing from a drug deal with Italian Americans, represented by their WASP spokesperson(clean criminal record, hence under the radar). Plus, history would probably suggest that the whole bizarre episode was observed and blessed by the CIA, but I would have no idea as to that.

Sometimes, I look back on shit I did 30 years back and wonder how I'm still alive. But, I am, and wouldn't have done a damned thing different. Well, there was that girl I met in Miami.......ah, nevermind.

Define "pragmatic progressive" ?

callmeslick wrote: I always have claimed to be a pragmatic progressive. Not in the moronic, Glenn Beck definition, but in the original definition of Progressive, which goes back to the Midwest early in the 20th century.

Old Pudfark sez: " I called you a fruit...you denied it and said you were an apple....WTF? "

Callmesick is eating this up.
My guess is he masturbates when reading the shit he is stirring up. (if he has a dick)

HH

Well HH, I am thinking that all Slick wants ? Is for folks to "take a bite out of the apple"..........