Wullie?
Re: Wullie?
Incorrect. Not like the outcry now. Because now the left (again) has another Jim Brady as a figurehead.
-
Pudfark
Re: Wullie?
Huh...half assed in total....you had it with the first seven words and should have stopped there.callmeslick wrote:I want to publicly apologize to Wullie, as I misread his intent. He clearly just relayed an erroneous early report or misread the statement the dude gave to the press. I shouldn't have assumed he was lying, and fell victim to the sad fact that lies for the purpose of making a point don't seem to faze others here. Sorry, Wullie.
Wullie didn't relay any erroneous info or misread anything. To the best of my knowledge, he never has.
This crap "fell victim" is pure BS. The only thing you are a victim of is your own arrogance and refusal to listen to the facts presented to you.
Then at the end, you call other unnamed individuals liars. Why don't you man up and name them?
The amount of "mistakes" that you make on these forums? You oughta be an expert in apologizing...
Really, what are you good at?
Old Pudfark sez: " If that passes as an apology.....a turd is a renewable energy source.... "
Re: Wullie?
You guys are hilarious.
I want to have drinks with Slick.
"How about no, you Crazy Dutch Bastard?"
-
callmeslick
- Posts: 16473
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:02 pm
- Location: Fearing and loathing in Delaware and Virginia.
Re: Wullie?
same legislation being proposed, at any rate. You might be correct about the 'figurehead', but the same sort of questions being asked, etc.ruggbutt wrote:Incorrect. Not like the outcry now. Because now the left (again) has another Jim Brady as a figurehead.
-
callmeslick
- Posts: 16473
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:02 pm
- Location: Fearing and loathing in Delaware and Virginia.
Re: Wullie?
sure, you, Ruggie and Happy. OK now?Pudfark wrote:Then at the end, you call other unnamed individuals liars. Why don't you man up and name them?
examples? Or, lying again?The amount of "mistakes" that you make on these forums?
-
callmeslick
- Posts: 16473
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:02 pm
- Location: Fearing and loathing in Delaware and Virginia.
Re: Wullie?
your town or mine?oFZo wrote:
You guys are hilarious.
I want to have drinks with Slick.
Re: Wullie?
Being a humble trucker and supporting a 3,5 month old (young) girl I don't think I'll be able to afford flying to the US for quite a while, either monetarily or psychologically...callmeslick wrote:your town or mine?oFZo wrote:
You guys are hilarious.
I want to have drinks with Slick.
You're welcome over here anytime though
"How about no, you Crazy Dutch Bastard?"
-
Pudfark
Re: Wullie?
Quote Pudfark:
The amount of "mistakes" that you make on these forums?
Quote CallmefullofSlick:
examples? Or, lying again?
[b]SEE BELOW:[/b]
callmeslick
Post subject: Wullie?Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2011 5:37 pm
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 8:02 pm
Posts: 2522
Location: Pennsylvania/Virginia USA
Wullie wrote:
It was an armed citizen that put a stop to that asshole's attack.
CallmefullofSlick wrote:
well, you made this idiotic statement on Sunday morning, I called you on it and what? Dead silence.
Looks to me, and at this stage not debatable, that it was two middle aged men, and an older woman,
wrestling the kid to the ground with bare hands.
Are you so compelled to defend your weak ideology that you will simply make stuff up to bolster a point?
Freaking lame.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wullie
Post subject: Re: Wullie?Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2011 7:39 pm
Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 10:07 am
Posts: 733
Pardon the fuck out of me. I worked 16 hours yesterday. I did not feel the need to respond to your asinine request at 12:30 last night when I got in from work. Couldn't have anyway as this is the first time this computer has been on since Saturday.
I do not apologize for making you look like an asshole as you are quite adept at that without any help from anyone.
I saw an interview with two men, according the reporter and the two men being interviewed, BOTH men pounced the guy while he was reloading. One of the men, the younger of the two announced that he had a concealed carry permit and was armed at the time.
Fuck off Libtard, or blame it on your libtard media for reporting it wrongly if it is not the truth.
Happy now?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
callmeslick
Post subject: Re: Wullie?Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2011 7:41 pm
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 8:02 pm
Posts: 2522
Location: Pennsylvania/Virginia USA
CallmefullofSlick wrote:
nice dodge. You're lying, and you know it.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
callmeslick
Post subject: Re: Wullie?Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2011 7:58 pm
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 8:02 pm
Posts: 2522
Location: Pennsylvania/Virginia USA
CallmefullofSlick wrote:
Wullie, your report was straight off of Fox News.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wullie
Post subject: Slick? Douchebag reservoir?Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2011 11:26 pm
Wullie then posted this link from "MSN" as proof
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540/vp ... 6#40994445
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
callmeslick
Post subject: Re: Wullie?Posted: Tue Jan 11, 2011 5:12 am
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 8:02 pm
Posts: 2522
Location: Pennsylvania/Virginia USA
CallmefullofSlick wrote:
I want to publicly apologize to Wullie, as I misread his intent. He clearly just relayed an erroneous early report or misread the statement the dude gave to the press. I shouldn't have assumed he was lying, and fell victim to the sad fact that lies for the purpose of making a point don't seem to faze others here. Sorry, Wullie.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pudfark
Post subject: Re: Wullie?Posted: Tue Jan 11, 2011 12:02 pm
Joined: Thu Sep 24, 2009 11:40 am
Posts: 1702
Location: Republic of Texas
Pudfark wrote:
Huh...half assed in total....you had it with the first seven words and should have stopped there.
Wullie didn't relay any erroneous info or misread anything. To the best of my knowledge, he never has.
This crap "fell victim" is pure BS. The only thing you are a victim of is your own arrogance and refusal to listen to the facts presented to you.
Then at the end, you call other unnamed individuals liars. Why don't you man up and name them?
The amount of "mistakes" that you make on these forums? You oughta be an expert in apologizing...
Really, what are you good at?
Old Pudfark sez: " If that passes as an apology.....a turd is a renewable energy source.... "
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shame on your parents for raising a worthless ineducable piece of shit.....I'll bet they feel like the parents of the "shooter" in Arizona....
The only thing you "add" to these forums?....Is to my personal amusement, which is why? I don't put you on "Ignore"......
Old Pudfark sez: " Ya can paint a skunk...but, ya can still smell'em.... "
The amount of "mistakes" that you make on these forums?
Quote CallmefullofSlick:
examples? Or, lying again?
[b]SEE BELOW:[/b]
callmeslick
Post subject: Wullie?Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2011 5:37 pm
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 8:02 pm
Posts: 2522
Location: Pennsylvania/Virginia USA
Wullie wrote:
It was an armed citizen that put a stop to that asshole's attack.
CallmefullofSlick wrote:
well, you made this idiotic statement on Sunday morning, I called you on it and what? Dead silence.
Looks to me, and at this stage not debatable, that it was two middle aged men, and an older woman,
wrestling the kid to the ground with bare hands.
Are you so compelled to defend your weak ideology that you will simply make stuff up to bolster a point?
Freaking lame.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wullie
Post subject: Re: Wullie?Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2011 7:39 pm
Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 10:07 am
Posts: 733
Pardon the fuck out of me. I worked 16 hours yesterday. I did not feel the need to respond to your asinine request at 12:30 last night when I got in from work. Couldn't have anyway as this is the first time this computer has been on since Saturday.
I do not apologize for making you look like an asshole as you are quite adept at that without any help from anyone.
I saw an interview with two men, according the reporter and the two men being interviewed, BOTH men pounced the guy while he was reloading. One of the men, the younger of the two announced that he had a concealed carry permit and was armed at the time.
Fuck off Libtard, or blame it on your libtard media for reporting it wrongly if it is not the truth.
Happy now?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
callmeslick
Post subject: Re: Wullie?Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2011 7:41 pm
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 8:02 pm
Posts: 2522
Location: Pennsylvania/Virginia USA
CallmefullofSlick wrote:
nice dodge. You're lying, and you know it.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
callmeslick
Post subject: Re: Wullie?Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2011 7:58 pm
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 8:02 pm
Posts: 2522
Location: Pennsylvania/Virginia USA
CallmefullofSlick wrote:
Wullie, your report was straight off of Fox News.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wullie
Post subject: Slick? Douchebag reservoir?Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2011 11:26 pm
Wullie then posted this link from "MSN" as proof
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540/vp ... 6#40994445
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
callmeslick
Post subject: Re: Wullie?Posted: Tue Jan 11, 2011 5:12 am
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 8:02 pm
Posts: 2522
Location: Pennsylvania/Virginia USA
CallmefullofSlick wrote:
I want to publicly apologize to Wullie, as I misread his intent. He clearly just relayed an erroneous early report or misread the statement the dude gave to the press. I shouldn't have assumed he was lying, and fell victim to the sad fact that lies for the purpose of making a point don't seem to faze others here. Sorry, Wullie.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pudfark
Post subject: Re: Wullie?Posted: Tue Jan 11, 2011 12:02 pm
Joined: Thu Sep 24, 2009 11:40 am
Posts: 1702
Location: Republic of Texas
Pudfark wrote:
Huh...half assed in total....you had it with the first seven words and should have stopped there.
Wullie didn't relay any erroneous info or misread anything. To the best of my knowledge, he never has.
This crap "fell victim" is pure BS. The only thing you are a victim of is your own arrogance and refusal to listen to the facts presented to you.
Then at the end, you call other unnamed individuals liars. Why don't you man up and name them?
The amount of "mistakes" that you make on these forums? You oughta be an expert in apologizing...
Really, what are you good at?
Old Pudfark sez: " If that passes as an apology.....a turd is a renewable energy source.... "
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shame on your parents for raising a worthless ineducable piece of shit.....I'll bet they feel like the parents of the "shooter" in Arizona....
The only thing you "add" to these forums?....Is to my personal amusement, which is why? I don't put you on "Ignore"......
Old Pudfark sez: " Ya can paint a skunk...but, ya can still smell'em.... "
-
Pudfark
Re: Wullie?
There ya go Slickie....
That's how you present facts and prove them (my post above this one)....
If you should attempt to make a "point" in the future.....have that kind of info....
Now about that erroneous statement of others telling lies? Get to proving it.....
If you're not capable? You can always work on yer apologies.......cuz, they suck.....
That's how you present facts and prove them (my post above this one)....
If you should attempt to make a "point" in the future.....have that kind of info....
Now about that erroneous statement of others telling lies? Get to proving it.....
If you're not capable? You can always work on yer apologies.......cuz, they suck.....
-
callmeslick
- Posts: 16473
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:02 pm
- Location: Fearing and loathing in Delaware and Virginia.
Re: Wullie?
Pud, you are a complete idiot. What you just cut and pasted, with nifty color touches, was the entire exchange for which I apologized to Wullie. I asked you about all the times I have been wrong here. Once again, you cannot comprehend simple English. Oh, and when I cite you as a prime example of lying to back up dubious points, one merely can pick through your entire history about Obama, healthcare and Progressives.
Now, mind you, I am quite aware that you are merely regurgitating Glenn Beck's proven lies. No surprise, you can't form a cogent sentence, let alone form any sort of independent thought.
Now, mind you, I am quite aware that you are merely regurgitating Glenn Beck's proven lies. No surprise, you can't form a cogent sentence, let alone form any sort of independent thought.