A Complete Waste of Space

If a job becomes available under Obama's Economy?

Which one is more likely to be hired at "Burger Doodle" or
if one them "Shovel Ready" jobs should magically appear,
after four years?

Pudfark wrote:So....how does a seriously indebted collage/college graduate get a job with Obama in office? Theres tens of thousands that would like to know that.

every report I've read says that last year was far better, and this year better still. It's an economic cycle. President could be anyone pretty much, it's going to cycle back up. And, when it does, due to the nature of the economy, the trend will be toward demand for folks with college-level education and skillsets, with the rest falling farther behind.

Here's a quickie question for ya?

What's the difference between an unemployed college graduate and an unemployed
GED/HS graduate?

one has a future.

I don't get this 'if jobs become available' crap, because I can attest from personal experience that LOTS of professional jobs are available, and in many cases begging for folks with the skills to fill them. Sure, those with no skills and no education worth shit are going to be slugging it out for a dwindling number of low paying jobs, but that isn't a future I wish on any young person.

well....that's the future you've borrowed and paid for.
Them.

reality check:
http://abcnews.go.com/Business/jobs-out ... d=16345862

that was last year.

What I'm curious about?
How does your sequestration fit into the "Prosperity Plan"?

callmeslick wrote:reality check:
http://abcnews.go.com/Business/jobs-out ... d=16345862

that was last year.

Hmmm, let me give you a forecast.
It's been raining for a week.
It's gonna end.

In retrospect/hindsight...you may have a small point.
It normally takes four years to get a college degree.
Obama will be outta office by then.

and the outlook for 2013 and forward:

http://www.naceweb.org/s09262012/job-outlook-2013/

and, note how Pud wants to change the subject to sequestration.........like sequestration makes a fucking difference in the lifelong employment prospects of a young person. Really, Pud, are you intellectually capable of getting your head around the fact that I'm taking a person's 30-40 years of employment into consideration here? I'm really starting to doubt that you can........

callmeslick wrote:and the outlook for 2013 and forward:

http://www.naceweb.org/s09262012/job-outlook-2013/

and, note how Pud wants to change the subject to sequestration.........like sequestration makes a fucking difference in the lifelong employment prospects of a young person. Really, Pud, are you intellectually capable of getting your head around the fact that I'm taking a person's 30-40 years of employment into consideration here? I'm really starting to doubt that you can........

What does 30-40 years of employment have to do with a young persons very limited job opportunities under Obama? Remember? Student Debt vs Graduate Jobs that's the topic here? No change in the plan, Obama and you brought sequestration into the mix. Confusing isn't it. It was meant to be originally, by Obama.