A Complete Waste of Space

Barfly wrote:

callmeslick wrote:I've addressed every lie. What do you want addressed. The kid smoked some pot(not a lot, from the levels, or not good pot, anyway), no sign of anything else in the urine(long term picture), nor in the blood(short term, or present). He talked some smack on FB, sort of like 100,000,000 other nitwits, at last count, and had an essentially normal autopsy for his age group(except for the gunshot wound). What's the big deal? Moreover, why paint him as anything other than what he clearly was.....a suburban black teenager who tragically got killed, for whatever reason(I'm not in the Zimmerman Is A Racist camp, at all)

No you haven't. You may not skip facts, or add mitigating modifiers to paint a different picture.

examples of skipped facts(seems I actually included 'facts' as opposed to 'bs made up in the right-wing blogosphere)?'I have no idea what you are calling mitigating modifiers, whatever that means.

Barfly wrote:Warning: robotic proponent of "Identity Politics" activated.... (danger danger! arms rotating... lol)

not really. If you make your call based on race, you are a racist. Period. Nothing political about it.

So everyone's a racist, you just want to pick the side that promotes a political, control agenda. You, the "I live a typical white boy lifestyle" self styled white boy. Makes you racist to identify yourself as such.

callmeslick wrote:

Pudfark wrote:Let's see....Trayvon had how many cuts and contusions? Other'n that there unfortunate GSW?

proving that not much of an altercation occurred, huh?

Proving that, initially, it was damn one sided....until the other side was left, with no choice.
Proving that the assault was started by Trayvon and finished by Zimmerman.

Of course...there is always the argument that Zimmerman beat him self up and bashed his own head on the sidewalk? Nope, there was that unfortunate witness.

callmeslick wrote:"seems I actually included 'facts'..."

I can see how it might "seem" factual to you..... you are confident if your presentation 'sticks', it can be considered fact? To bad you can't just "deem" it so! That would be so much easier than having honest discourse.

Instead of providing actual evidence, or presenting a well considered objective opinion, you throw a blog quality presentation up against the wall, hoping it sticks, then accuse others of the same. It's hypocritical, and apparent in it's defensive quality to most here. Perhaps try a more aggressive, fact based, more well considered opinion, it may get more traction.

Seemingly...Slick is off to the "choom room" atm.
Based upon known events over the last 10-15 years...seems them what "holds on to" and "plays" the "race card"? Are in fact the "racists". The reverse of that theory? Them what don't hold on to and don't play that race card? Would be called?

Sorta like what ya said Barfly about Slick, "You, the "I live a typical white boy lifestyle" self styled white boy. Makes you racist to identify yourself as such." That would be true.

Barfly wrote:So everyone's a racist, you just want to pick the side that promotes a political, control agenda. You, the "I live a typical white boy lifestyle" self styled white boy. Makes you racist to identify yourself as such.

yup, except I don't live in fear(or 'leery' as you put it) of anyone because of race, nor do I judge anyone based upon their race. Hey, 99% of all bank fraud is committed by white males.....should I be 'leery' of white guys when I walk into a bank?

For what it's worth, every single person who has ever told me to be, or that they were, 'leery' of someone due to the mere color of their skin, has proven to be, to put it crudely, a flat-out pussy. It's a stupid person's approach, a coward's approach, nothing less.

Pudfark wrote:Proving that, initially, it was damn one sided....until the other side was left, with no choice.
Proving that the assault was started by Trayvon and finished by Zimmerman.

this is what passes for 'proof' on your planet?

Barfly wrote:I can see how it might "seem" factual to you..... you are confident if your presentation 'sticks', it can be considered fact? To bad you can't just "deem" it so! That would be so much easier than having honest discourse.

Instead of providing actual evidence, or presenting a well considered objective opinion, you throw a blog quality presentation up against the wall, hoping it sticks, then accuse others of the same. It's hypocritical, and apparent in it's defensive quality to most here. Perhaps try a more aggressive, fact based, more well considered opinion, it may get more traction.

dude, I've been a clinical chemist for 30 years, and taught physiology in graduate school. I gave you informed opinion about facts in an autopsy. You choose to believe what some right-wing blog tells you, fine. Stay ignorant.

callmeslick wrote:yup, except I don't live in fear(or 'leery' as you put it) of anyone because of race, nor do I judge anyone based upon their race. Hey, 99% of all bank fraud is committed by white males.....should I be 'leery' of white guys when I walk into a bank?

You need to pick up a dictionary and check out the difference of the two words, and while you're at it don't add words to what I wrote! No fear here!

For what it's worth, every single person who has ever told me to be, or that they were, 'leery' of someone due to the mere color of their skin, has proven to be, to put it crudely, a flat-out pussy. It's a stupid person's approach, a coward's approach, nothing less.

So now I am a pussy, stupid and a coward! Is this how you talk to people when standing face to face?? You are nothing more than a troll and don't have a clue! Most the crap you spout is just that, crap. I have been reading your drivel here for many years trying hard to maybe see where you’re coming from, it is now very clear to me.