A Complete Waste of Space

callmeslick wrote:Fats is an Aussie. As such, he gets a pass(we expect him to be completely unfathomable at times). Plus, he's actually made POSITIVE contributions over the past decade or so. There IS a difference. Most folks get that.

Gonna Fix That for ya..

callmeslick wrote:Fats is "special". As such, he gets a pass(we expect him to be completely unfathomable at times). Plus, he doesn't initiate my vaginal cramping. There IS a difference. Most folks get that and it makes my "winkie" quiver.

I like Fats too. Mainly cuz he's pretty informed about things here. Mostly, cuz he man's up and don't whine about shit. A lesson you and R_D could learn. On the positive contributions thingy....pretty simples, this the "Politics and Rhetoric" Section and there ain't supposed to be anything "positive" here.... Most folks get that.

Still not a word about this on any of the major networks.
Nothing.

I'm starting to wonder if this might be "fake" news.

ya think?

callmeslick wrote:ya think?

I don't know, man.
I'm starting to thing that some radical ultra right wing conservative fake news source fed Pud a line of crap and he bought into it hook line and sinker.
But ..... what are the odds of that happening?

Reservoir_Dog wrote:

callmeslick wrote:ya think?

I don't know, man.
I'm starting to thing that some radical ultra right wing conservative fake news source fed Pud a line of crap and he bought into it hook line and sinker.
But ..... what are the odds of that happening?

I'd say..better than the odd's either of you will supply/convey any supporting information/links...

Still laughing.....y'all got the gall to complain...and ya never back up yer "shit" with links or facts..nothing....

Night All...I will be hitting the rack...with a smile tonight...

how, Pud, are we to provide supporting links to the fact that a story DOESN'T have truth to it? Actually, from what Res has posted, I see the support in the fact that NO ONE of any magnitude is reporting this. NO ONE.

callmeslick wrote:how, Pud, are we to provide supporting links to the fact that a story DOESN'T have truth to it? Actually, from what Res has posted, I see the support in the fact that NO ONE of any magnitude is reporting this. NO ONE.

It's old news, and you know that it is true.
Why complain about the source?
We will be using it in two years, trust me.
Hillary has all the baggage needed to remind
of us of what a scumbag she really is.

Watergate, Whitewater, and Benghazi to name the big names.
Demo-Care will quickly become Clinton-Care

2016 will be fun, win lose or chad we will roast Hillary well past "well done".

Hopefully I will be pissin in your Cheerios.

Now, go back to complanin about grammar and spellink little boy.

HH

Get used to the idea of 8 years of Hillary and Bill back in the White House.

callmeslick wrote:how, Pud, are we to provide supporting links to the fact that a story DOESN'T have truth to it? Actually, from what Res has posted, I see the support in the fact that NO ONE of any magnitude is reporting this. NO ONE.

Well Slick/R_D ya could start with the links I've posted in this thread

Seems interesting? There are many additional links to what I posted...the info has been out there for years. You can't find any links to refute it? Even a "simpleton" knows....then, it must be true.

Fixored: "I see the support in the fact that NO ONE of any magnitude is refuting this. NO ONE.
Yup, I see it that way too....

callmeslick wrote:Get used to the idea of 8 years of Hillary and Bill back in the White House.

It's old news, and you know that it is true.
Why complain about the source?
We will be using it in two years, trust me.
Hillary has all the baggage needed to remind
of us of what a scumbag she really is.

Watergate, Whitewater, and Benghazi to name the big names.
Demo-Care will quickly become Clinton-Care

2016 will be fun, win lose or chad we will roast Hillary well past "well done".

Hopefully I will be pissin in your Cheerios.

Now, go back to complanin about grammar and spellink little boy.

HH