Here ya go Nic.....

Post Reply
Pudfark

Re: Here ya go Nic.....

Post by Pudfark »

and yet...a little more info.
More questions....

Lawmakers question whether FBI probe affected Petraeus' statements on Libya

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/11 ... z2CCsyhMZq

Petraeus agrees to testify on Libya before congressional committees

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/11 ... z2CCtH8ZHj

This shit must be really bad....
Two months later...and still can't "spin it".
Sacrificing two General Officers/CIA Head ain't getting it done?
What's next?
Oh, that's right....back to the play book....find another "crisis"?
or make one up. ;)
Top
Pudfark

Re: Here ya go Nic.....

Post by Pudfark »

Here's a proper list of questions.... :)

Letter from Rep. Lamar Smith to Attorney General Eric Holder about Petraeus scandal

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/interac ... -petraeus/

I beginning to think?
Eric Holder likes getting his nuts squeezed.
Being Obama's "boy"...is similar to being Barney Frank's "boy"?
Some folks may be wondering..."How much can Eric....take"?
Holders nick name...oughta be "keystone"..... ;)
Top
CUDA
Posts: 1384
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 11:23 pm
Location: The lone Conservative voice in the Liberal Bastion of Portland Oregon

Re: Here ya go Nic.....

Post by CUDA »

callmeslick wrote:nah, I'm just waiting for facts of any sort, not conspiracy theories. Speculate away, all.
just exactly how many MORE facts do you need???
"In reality, there exists only fact and fiction.
Opinions result from a lack of the former and a reliance on the latter."
Image
Top
Pudfark

Re: Here ya go Nic.....

Post by Pudfark »

Maybe? This will "tilt" Slick forward?

William Ward, Four Star General, Demoted For Lavish Spending
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/1 ... 22379.html

WASHINGTON — Defense Secretary Leon Panetta has demoted the former head of U.S. Africa Command who was accused of spending thousands of dollars on lavish travel and other unauthorized expenses, the Pentagon said Tuesday.

Panetta stripped Gen. William "Kip" Ward of a star, which means that he will now retire as a three-star lieutenant general. Ward also has been ordered to repay the government $82,000.

Secretary of the Army John McHugh concurred with Panetta's decision, Pentagon press secretary George Little said in a statement Tuesday.

The demotion came after retired Army Gen. David Petraeus resigned as CIA director because of an extramarital affair and Marine Gen. John Allen was being investigated for potentially improper communications with a woman.

"Secretary Panetta insists that leaders within the Department of Defense exemplify both professional excellence and sound judgment," Little said. "The secretary is committed to ensuring that any improprieties or misconduct by senior officers are dealt with swiftly and appropriately."

Swiftly and Appropriately
These two words seemingly don't apply to Obama, Holder or the White House. Why?

I take it, Slick? That the "hair gel" makes it easier?
To stay out of the "spot light".... ;)

Old Pudfark sez: " Obama is running/ruining this country....like a "Plantation Owner" in the early 1800's...in the land of cotton "

Old Slick would say: "Look away...Look away...Look away, Dixie Land"

I'm not trying to draw you out to jump on ya, Slick. Just wondering?
Why you don't recognize the import of this?
Why you seem?
So unconcerned?
Top
Pudfark

Re: Here ya go Nic.....

Post by Pudfark »

Hey CUDA...
Do you find it interesting/frightening?
That the three top military folks in the Libya region?
All got disgraced and shit canned? At the same time?
A total destruction of their credibility.

Makes me wonder?
If it's "Seven days in May"?
In reverse.

Maybe?
"The Man-Kenyan Candidate"?
Top
CUDA
Posts: 1384
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 11:23 pm
Location: The lone Conservative voice in the Liberal Bastion of Portland Oregon

Re: Here ya go Nic.....

Post by CUDA »

there is "RUMOR" that Patreaus had stated "do you want me to say what really happened in Benghazi or do you want me to tell the story line". "RUMOR"

I'm assuming the Patreaus is a man of honor. "MOST" career military men are ( even if he is a democrat :P ) I am very curious to what he will say before the house committee since he voluntarily agreed to go before them.

speculation on my part

now that he is not part of the Administration he is not under the gag order of "Executive Privilege" and Military commanders don't usually take well to their men being left our to dry. (SEALS / CIA ) they will follow orders because they ARE men of honor.

HONOR , DUTY, COUNTRY

Which one will he choose?? or will it be all 3 and lay out for congress what the facts are about Benghazi as seem to be the case from what's been reported so far


:popcorn:
"In reality, there exists only fact and fiction.
Opinions result from a lack of the former and a reliance on the latter."
Image
Top
CUDA
Posts: 1384
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 11:23 pm
Location: The lone Conservative voice in the Liberal Bastion of Portland Oregon

Re: Here ya go Nic.....

Post by CUDA »

side note.

Why does Eric holder still have a Job??? supposedly he knew months ago that Patreaus was under investigation and supposedly he didn't tell the President about it.

either is it gross incompetent (again) on his part. or the President is Lying. he's lying that he didn't know that his top cabinet intel man was under investigation by the FBI. which is it??
"In reality, there exists only fact and fiction.
Opinions result from a lack of the former and a reliance on the latter."
Image
Top
Pudfark

Re: Here ya go Nic.....

Post by Pudfark »

Good questions CUDA :)

We probably won't have any answers...until they run out of "hair gel".

At one time...I believe Patreaus was a man of honor. He isn't now.
I believe this because he lied. That lie, allowed him to be "black maled/mailed"
by his "superiors" into lying to the public. He may testify? Under oath? If, he does,
I expect him to take the "fifth". Even, if? He turns against the "black malers/mailers", he is still to easy to discredit. It will be interesting, if, he is compelled to testify?
I won't believe it...until I see it.

Slick won't believe it....until he is told to/two/too. ;)
Top
CUDA
Posts: 1384
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 11:23 pm
Location: The lone Conservative voice in the Liberal Bastion of Portland Oregon

Re: Here ya go Nic.....

Post by CUDA »

According to one source, it is long-standing FBI policy for the FBI not to brief Congress or the White House in the middle of a criminal probe that does not involve a security threat.
let me get this right. A man who one of the Presidents TOP advisers and is on his cabinet, the HEAD of the CIA is having an affair with a woman, and potentially sharing secret documents, is somehow NOT A SECURITY THREAT???
"In reality, there exists only fact and fiction.
Opinions result from a lack of the former and a reliance on the latter."
Image
Top
Pudfark

Re: Here ya go Nic.....

Post by Pudfark »

Obama just said on the news..."How would it have looked? If, I interfered in a
criminal investigation?" (words to that effect).

My take on it....The investigation was not about "criminal conduct" on Patreaus.
It was on the "e-mailer", "cyber-threat"...etc. Which, is still bogus.

Obama also said.. "he was waiting for the investigation to complete (words to that effect) before passing judgement."

My words....It don't take five + months to figure it out. Unless, your folks are idiots and you are one too/two. This is fomenting/fronting a "cover up".

It boils down to this?
The "cyber threat" and Petreaus?
Is the same type of lie as.....
The "video" and Libya.
The same dishonesty and disclosure with the same damage.

So....Slick?
Do you still believe?
This is nobodies business?

Old Pudfark sez: " Makes me wonder? How long a "lib" can sit on their thumb? Before realizing? :shock: It's an impediment to? Ridding themself of a turd. "
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Politics and Rhetoric”