Page 5 of 5
Re: Hey, Pud, you going to Oregon
Posted: Wed Jan 06, 2016 11:36 am
by callmeslick
been thinking about this bit of history myself of late.....good to see a graphic depiction:

Re: Hey, Pud, you going to Oregon
Posted: Wed Jan 06, 2016 1:06 pm
by Pudfark
This ain't about Whiskey.

Re: Hey, Pud, you going to Oregon
Posted: Wed Jan 06, 2016 1:57 pm
by callmeslick
no, it is about giving public lands to private individuals and corporations. Even worse, although the whiskey of 1790 was likely pretty bad.
Re: Hey, Pud, you going to Oregon
Posted: Wed Jan 06, 2016 3:03 pm
by Pudfark

Good of you to acknowledge, that...you're the one doing the giving and the grabbing.
Re: Hey, Pud, you going to Oregon
Posted: Wed Jan 06, 2016 3:18 pm
by callmeslick
how is giving public land(belongs to all of us) to any individual, anything but a grab by THEM?
Re: Hey, Pud, you going to Oregon
Posted: Wed Jan 06, 2016 3:32 pm
by Pudfark
callmeslick wrote:how is giving public land(belongs to all of us) to any individual, anything but a grab by THEM?
Slick...you're just making me laugh this week...

Apply yer logic above, to 'occupy wall street'. Then get back to me....

Re: Hey, Pud, you going to Oregon
Posted: Wed Jan 06, 2016 6:45 pm
by callmeslick
nailed it!

Re: Hey, Pud, you going to Oregon
Posted: Wed Jan 06, 2016 7:13 pm
by Pudfark
I see yer application...it made me giggle.

Re: Hey, Pud, you going to Oregon
Posted: Fri Jan 08, 2016 5:36 pm
by callmeslick
Re: Hey, Pud, you going to Oregon
Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2016 3:12 pm
by Pudfark
I see yer still illustrating yer own party's failed ploy...
Which...has as much 'traction' here..as it does elsewhere...0
