Page 5 of 5
					
				Re: Hey, Pud, you going to Oregon
				Posted: Wed Jan 06, 2016 11:36 am
				by callmeslick
				been thinking about this bit of history myself of late.....good to see a graphic depiction:

 
			
					
				Re: Hey, Pud, you going to Oregon
				Posted: Wed Jan 06, 2016 1:06 pm
				by Pudfark
				This ain't about Whiskey.   

 
			
					
				Re: Hey, Pud, you going to Oregon
				Posted: Wed Jan 06, 2016 1:57 pm
				by callmeslick
				no, it is about giving public lands to private individuals and corporations. Even worse, although the whiskey of 1790 was likely pretty bad.
			 
			
					
				Re: Hey, Pud, you going to Oregon
				Posted: Wed Jan 06, 2016 3:03 pm
				by Pudfark
				
  Good of you to acknowledge, that...you're the one doing the giving and the grabbing.
 
			
					
				Re: Hey, Pud, you going to Oregon
				Posted: Wed Jan 06, 2016 3:18 pm
				by callmeslick
				how is giving public land(belongs to all of us) to any individual, anything but a grab by THEM?
			 
			
					
				Re: Hey, Pud, you going to Oregon
				Posted: Wed Jan 06, 2016 3:32 pm
				by Pudfark
				callmeslick wrote:how is giving public land(belongs to all of us) to any individual, anything but a grab by THEM?
Slick...you're just making me laugh this week... 

   Apply yer logic above, to 'occupy wall street'.  Then get back to me.... 

 
			
					
				Re: Hey, Pud, you going to Oregon
				Posted: Wed Jan 06, 2016 6:45 pm
				by callmeslick
				nailed it!

 
			
					
				Re: Hey, Pud, you going to Oregon
				Posted: Wed Jan 06, 2016 7:13 pm
				by Pudfark
				I see yer application...it made me giggle.  

 
			
					
				Re: Hey, Pud, you going to Oregon
				Posted: Fri Jan 08, 2016 5:36 pm
				by callmeslick
				
			 
			
					
				Re: Hey, Pud, you going to Oregon
				Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2016 3:12 pm
				by Pudfark
				I see yer still illustrating yer own party's failed ploy... 
 
 
Which...has as much 'traction' here..as it does elsewhere...0   
