Page 5 of 7

Re: Obama refuse to allow prosecution of voter intimidation case

Posted: Tue Jul 13, 2010 5:33 am
by callmeslick
priceless, Ruggie....Fox at it's best. Since Franken won by 312 and 341 felons were shown to have voted,
they must've all voted for Franken. If you can't see the sad logic behind that spin, you aren't as bright as I give you credit for.

And, yes, wullie, this 'hot button' issue is just that, trivia. Funny how it isn't being shouted over, or barely mentioned in any of the 3 Philly newspapers, or any of the suburban ones either. And, please, don't suggest they are all liberal outlets, because it isn't true.

Re: Obama refuse to allow prosecution of voter intimidation case

Posted: Tue Jul 13, 2010 6:07 am
by HappyHappy
LMAO, only Democratic convicted felons are allowed to vote!
Callmesick, you are so one sided!
If they were swinging the vote in favor of the Republicans you would
be crying for their heads!

One thing that I do have to thank you for CallmeSICK.
You are increasing the number of voters who will never vote communist (Democrat).

I am laughing at you Callmesick. Laughing so hard it hurts!
:mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen:

By the way, I never knew of ANY jail bird to support a Republican.
They prefer the party of the whimps.

HH

Re: Obama refuse to allow prosecution of voter intimidation case

Posted: Tue Jul 13, 2010 12:51 pm
by ruggbutt
I love it, since it's Fox it has no credibility. 9/11 must not have happened either cuz Fox covered it. You're a dumbfuck Slick.

Re: Obama refuse to allow prosecution of voter intimidation case

Posted: Tue Jul 13, 2010 2:37 pm
by Pudfark
Old Pudfark sez: " If ya ignore the truth, ya can deny it and act ignorant "

In this case, it's all over the internet and the damning evidence is in video with sound and nobody is denying it....except the DOJ, New Black Panthers, NAACP and their boss Obama.

Re: Obama refuse to allow prosecution of voter intimidation case

Posted: Tue Jul 13, 2010 5:21 pm
by callmeslick
ruggbutt wrote:I love it, since it's Fox it has no credibility. 9/11 must not have happened either cuz Fox covered it. You're a dumbfuck Slick.

wow! You really have no clue about logic or intelligent thought. Sad. Really sad.

Re: Obama refuse to allow prosecution of voter intimidation case

Posted: Tue Jul 13, 2010 11:12 pm
by Wullie
Tempest in a tea pot huh?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UymN7t1k ... r_embedded

Appears to be quite few more pissed off people videos there as well.
Image

Re: Obama refuse to allow prosecution of voter intimidation case

Posted: Wed Jul 14, 2010 5:26 am
by callmeslick
keep focusing on the stupid stuff, fellas. Don't worry, there's plenty of folks smart enough to focus on the real issues and they'll keep running the show.

Re: Obama refuse to allow prosecution of voter intimidation case

Posted: Wed Jul 14, 2010 6:38 am
by HappyHappy
keep focusing on the stupid stuff, fellas. Don't worry, there's plenty of folks smart enough to focus on the real issues and they'll keep running the show.
As of November WE THE PEOPLE will have a return of representative goverment
and WE will run the show.

Funny thing Callmesick you are the only person on this forum trumpeting the
leftist "Liberal" agenda.

I know my issues and I will elect REPUBLICANS to go to washington to REPRESENT
me in the House and Senate.

Things like the first and second amendment are high on the list.
Reducing spending cutting welfare, making everyone of working age do so.
Ditching that EXTREMELY POOR health care bill is a top priority.

Obama and his minions are DOOMED. We the people will take back control of our future.

HH

Re: Obama refuse to allow prosecution of voter intimidation case

Posted: Wed Jul 14, 2010 12:33 pm
by Barfly
Mr Slick has a point... I agree that felons probably didn't make it happen for Stuart Smalley... it was dead people! Dead people, an arguably larger dem voting block than felons.

Re: Obama refuse to allow prosecution of voter intimidation case

Posted: Wed Jul 14, 2010 6:06 pm
by callmeslick
Barfly wrote:Mr Slick has a point... I agree that felons probably didn't make it happen for Stuart Smalley... it was dead people! Dead people, an arguably larger dem voting block than felons.

and, don't forget 'absentee' ballots. Lots of fraud there. The only good thing would seem to be this: all three groups have long proven to be extremely bipartisan. It's all about turnout...... ;)