Page 6 of 12
Re: Sequester?
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 7:45 pm
by Pudfark
Time to tighten up the belts and suspenders for normal folks...
You east coasters might wanna take the slack outta yer garters and waders...
This engineered set up by Obama is gonna be a blast. As in..........?
The odds of the next war being nuclear, just doubled.
Get ready for Texas to Rule...

Re: Sequester?
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 7:48 pm
by callmeslick
ahhhh, explain how when Congress passed this, and then failed to reach a meaningful compromise(thanks to GOP reluctance to close tax loopholes for wealthy Americans), it becomes Obama's fault?? You might want to work on a more convincing argument than what is out there, because the polls put the blame on the GOP by a 4 to 1 margin. This is heading to a PR disaster, which, sadly, will hurt some regular folks along the way.......
Re: Sequester?
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 11:41 pm
by Buzz
Pudfark wrote:"Depends" on what ya get out of it Buzz.....
You asked me two questions and I answered as you requested.
Now what?
I lost interest in you when you said yes to the 1st question.
Re: Sequester?
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 12:51 am
by Pudfark
Didn't mean to hurt yer feelin's precious...
Ask a better question next time.

Re: Sequester?
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 1:04 am
by Barfly
I got tired of people repeating Obama's rhetoric, in lieu of having an intelligent discussion.
Re: Sequester?
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 1:55 am
by CUDA
It's all bullshit there are no spendig cuts the president is lying and playing politics, why have they relased prisoners already when the sequester hasn't even gone into affect and yet claim they are because of the cuts?
Saying this is a spending cut is like me asking my dad for a 20 $ raise in my allowance and him only giving me 17.
I hate geting lied to and thats all this administration seems to know how to do
Re: Sequester?
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 10:02 am
by Pudfark
@Barfly&Cuda
Exactly. Since it was pointed out to Slick a day or so ago...
He's been trying to dry his panties and change the conversation.
Slick's like a cat on a commode seat...he don't know which way to go,
without falling in.

Re: Sequester?
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 10:33 am
by callmeslick
we'll see how it plays out. I think the sequester is a blunt tool to achieve what should have been done through a combination of cuts and tightened tax loopholes. This way, you sort of end up with a clumsy, broad approach that will likely hurt the economy. Time will tell. The politics and fallout seem to be obvious at this stage, and that ALL works in Obama's favor, down the road.
Re: Sequester?
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 10:39 am
by Pudfark
The light you should be seeing?
Is at the end of the tunnel.
This road yer talking about?
Ends there in four years.

Re: Sequester?
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 11:03 am
by callmeslick
waiting for Hillary already, Pud?
