Page 6 of 8

Re: an old subject for question.....

Posted: Wed Jun 18, 2014 12:35 pm
by callmeslick
Pudfark wrote:Probably folks would go along with it...maybe, even me.
However, this thought haunts....It coulda and maybe shoulda been done by air?
Why put more folks at risk?
potential collateral damage adding to the already common impression of the US as a bunch of assholes within the Middle East.

Re: an old subject for question.....

Posted: Wed Jun 18, 2014 12:37 pm
by callmeslick
Pudfark wrote::lol: They might try....they haven't so far....other contracts exist for future sales to others.
um, see Venezuela's long-term deals, for starters, and Mexico's.
Pretty much that's your excuse to do nothing. Nothing begets Nothing. What I have proposed costs comparatively nothing and could resolve many problems now and in the future.

So, for the record..."You propose, do nothing" ?
what is your proposal, and how does it resolve ANY problems?

Re: an old subject for question.....

Posted: Wed Jun 18, 2014 12:45 pm
by Pudfark
"What is your proposal?" :lol:
I've already presented it. :lol:

What's yours?
So far, it's been nothing. :lol:

Re: an old subject for question.....

Posted: Wed Jun 18, 2014 12:55 pm
by callmeslick
proposal for what? The thread is/was about Iraq, you somehow blabbered something about an oil pipeline which would accomplish nothing(has been proven by experts to be the case). What are you blabbering about now? What proposal did you put forth? I see nothing, but the usual stupid use of language.

Re: an old subject for question.....

Posted: Wed Jun 18, 2014 1:11 pm
by Pudfark
I see you avoiding...again. :lol:
You obviously have nothing to contribute hear/here.
We'll mark ya down fer an "abstain", which in yer case would be the gravy on yer T-shirt. :lol:

Re: an old subject for question.....

Posted: Wed Jun 18, 2014 2:14 pm
by callmeslick
care to post your question in English?

Re: an old subject for question.....

Posted: Wed Jun 18, 2014 2:32 pm
by Pudfark
I believe your lack of comprehension is the leading cause of your persistent prevarication and confusion.
Certainly, others believe it too.

Have a nice day... :)

Re: an old subject for question.....

Posted: Wed Jun 18, 2014 2:39 pm
by callmeslick
I see, you had no point. You had no question. At least you aren't going to have the balls to come on here and call for a repeat of past stupidity. As I wrote elsewhere:"...and now the experts come out of the TV woodworks: Bremer, Kristol, Cheney.....forgawdsakes, Dick Freaking Cheney? He wants to help the nation figure out what to do in Iraq? Dick Cheney? He should be publicly flogged for getting us involved whatsoever, and the rest of that neocon crowd should be hung from DC lampposts by the testicles. Do these clowns understand that we're still dealing with the fact they made the DUMBEST decision in US foreign policy history??"

Re: an old subject for question.....

Posted: Wed Jun 18, 2014 3:44 pm
by Pudfark
callmeslick wrote:I see, you had no point. You had no question. At least you aren't going to have the balls to come on here and call for a repeat of past stupidity. As I wrote elsewhere:"...and now the experts come out of the TV woodworks: Bremer, Kristol, Cheney.....forgawdsakes, Dick Freaking Cheney? He wants to help the nation figure out what to do in Iraq? Dick Cheney? He should be publicly flogged for getting us involved whatsoever, and the rest of that neocon crowd should be hung from DC lampposts by the testicles. Do these clowns understand that we're still dealing with the fact they made the DUMBEST decision in US foreign policy history??"
That includes Hillary too. :lol:

Image

Re: an old subject for question.....

Posted: Thu Jun 19, 2014 3:00 pm
by callmeslick