Page 6 of 7
Re: Obama refuse to allow prosecution of voter intimidation case
Posted: Wed Jul 14, 2010 7:38 pm
by callmeslick
HappyHappy wrote:I know my issues and I will elect REPUBLICANS to go to washington to REPRESENT
me in the House and Senate.
HH
They already did, in the Senate, and you won't likely replace Judd Gregg favorably with any of the 4 Republicans, or two Democrats on the ballot.
As for your house distict, you have Dems at present. The races are close, my friends in state tell me. Either way, you'll end up with either a Democrat or a New England-style(see-Scott Brown, Olympia Snowe) Republican. I have no complaint, but still say it sucks you all are losing Gregg. A good man.
Re: Obama refuse to allow prosecution of voter intimidation case
Posted: Mon Jul 19, 2010 5:42 pm
by callmeslick
bumped for Happy to tell us all how he is going to have any impact on the Democrats in Congress and the Senate. What's the matter, moron? You going to tell me that New Hampshire is going to send some sort of radically different type of representation to Congress?
God, you're slow.
Re: Obama refuse to allow prosecution of voter intimidation case
Posted: Mon Jul 19, 2010 5:47 pm
by HappyHappy
Again I feel better. Getting insulted by a moron and a communist makes me feel all warm and fuzzy inside.
I just took a BIG Callmesick and wiped my Obama.
It is better to sit here and wait as you made so many moronic posts.
We are all laughing at your immature dribble.
yes child, I will vote Republican no matter how hard
you trumpet your communist fantasies.
HH
Re: Obama refuse to allow prosecution of voter intimidation case
Posted: Mon Jul 19, 2010 7:54 pm
by callmeslick
pretty much what I thought. You don't even know who's running. Hell, chump, I have a better grasp of politics in your own state than you do. Remember in November? You'll be lucky if you remember what day of the week they hold elections on.

Re: Obama refuse to allow prosecution of voter intimidation case
Posted: Mon Jul 19, 2010 8:20 pm
by Pudfark
callmeslick wrote:pretty much what I thought. You don't even know who's running. Hell, chump, I have a better grasp of politics in your own state than you do. Remember in November? You'll be lucky if you remember what day of the week they hold elections on.

Ah, another fine example of voter intimidation....with an eloquent put down....I'm laughing as hard as HH on this one.........

Re: Obama refuse to allow prosecution of voter intimidation case
Posted: Mon Jul 19, 2010 8:33 pm
by callmeslick
Pudfark wrote:Ah, another fine example of voter intimidation....with an eloquent put down....I'm laughing as hard as HH on this one.........

wow. You really cannot read and comprehend, can you? Sad.
Please point out the intimidation.....
Re: Obama refuse to allow prosecution of voter intimidation case
Posted: Mon Jul 19, 2010 8:41 pm
by HappyHappy
Pudfark please forgive the tard, he knows not what he says.
It's all about trying to score a extra vote for the communists.
But CallmeSICK is so dull that the only supporters he scores are
Canadians and Frenchmen.
Pssssss, unlike the Latino's they are not undocumented Democrats...
We are getting to him, he is posting franticly.
HH
Re: Obama refuse to allow prosecution of voter intimidation case
Posted: Mon Jul 19, 2010 8:56 pm
by callmeslick
HappyHappy wrote:Pudfark please forgive the tard, he knows not what he says.
It's all about trying to score a extra vote for the communists.
But CallmeSICK is so dull that the only supporters he scores are
Canadians and Frenchmen.
Pssssss, unlike the Latino's they are not undocumented Democrats...
We are getting to him, he is posting franticly.
HH
sorry dude, but your 'frantic' is me responding to a trio of idiots, and Ruggbutt who I hold some respect far, addled though he can get at times. Want to see my 'supporters'? Wait until November, and we'll see who represents you in New Hampshire. And, who controls the House and Senate nationally. I can't wait.
Re: Obama refuse to allow prosecution of voter intimidation case
Posted: Tue Jul 20, 2010 1:25 am
by Pudfark
callmeslick wrote:Want to see my 'supporters'? Wait until November
I will concede, that you may/might have a point there. Here's my point, wait until April 15th, 2011. (When the tax man and fed health care hose your voters)
Old Pudfark sez: " How will they ever, buy them back??? "
Re: Obama refuse to allow prosecution of voter intimidation case
Posted: Tue Jul 20, 2010 6:58 pm
by callmeslick
Pudfark wrote:I will concede, that you may/might have a point there. Here's my point, wait until April 15th, 2011. (When the tax man and fed health care hose your voters)
c'mon, dude, give it up. Really. April 15, 2011 is when taxes for 2010 are due. No changes there. And healthcare is an issue that Dem voters want expanded, so the only way they feel hosed is that the Obama administration compromised. So, as usual, you are making little, if any, sense. You might want to go and take your lame schtick to people stupid enough to buy into it.