A Complete Waste of Space

adversity doesn't build Character it reveals it.

It did in your case.

Pudfark wrote:Obama is the most inept or devious President in the history of our country.
It's one or the other....maybe, both.

geez, get over the Obama hard-on. Inept? Try on any of the following: U.S.Grant, Millard Fillmore, Warren Harding, George W. Bush.
Devious? Ever heard the name Dick Nixon? You could add a few more to that list as well.
What you cite are a bunch of relatively small-potatoes blips in foreign and domestic policy. Nothing in any way off the path of 'typical'. Nothing so
terrible as 9/11/01 or Pearl Harbor. Nothing as criminal as Watergate or Iran/Contra(to cite two more recent examples). To make a statement such as
the above shows both a total lack of historical knowledge of your native country, and an ideological brainwash level that is shocking. Obama is your
President. Get the fuck over it.

"Obama is your President. Get the fuck over it."

Well Slick....I'd rather be "over it" than "under it".

And another possible witness disappears:

http://edition.cnn.com/2012/11/21/world ... Popular%29

Killed by unidentified gunmen

Are we staring to see a pattern slicker or are you still living in denial?

Nic

denial? Of what? Nothing in that, or any other article, shows that poor soul to be 'witness' to anything, likely or otherwise. The Benghazi matter has been beaten to death, largely for ideological reasons, and seems to be nothing more than an attempt to protect CIA employees before they could be gotten out of town, coupled with a lower than necessary security level, mandated by budget cuts. Nothing more sinister to me than that. Anything else is speculation, largely motivated by folks with an agenda that doesn't involve true security issues for our diplomatic corps.

callmeslick wrote:denial? Of what? Nothing in that, or any other article, shows that poor soul to be 'witness' to anything, likely or otherwise. The Benghazi matter has been beaten to death, largely for ideological reasons, and seems to be nothing more than an attempt to protect CIA employees before they could be gotten out of town, coupled with a lower than necessary security level, mandated by budget cuts. Nothing more sinister to me than that. Anything else is speculation, largely motivated by folks with an agenda that doesn't involve true security issues for our diplomatic corps.

That describes the Obama Administration perfectly.
What's more amusing than the above?
Rice is still "sticking" to the video tale....
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/11 ... latestnews

She says she was only repeating what the CIA said....She does a huge fail on
not mentioning...the most important part of the CIA briefing? Was redacted by
the White House.

@Nic "a series of coincidences, cover ups and delays"?
Does not denote anything....to Slick and Obama.

Old Pudfark sez: " Just because ya smell smoke? Don't mean ya have to look for fire.
Especially, if you don't care what's burning.... "

Slick, tell me: After how many coincidences does it cease to be a coincidence? Tell me a number and I'll keep digging until I reach it.

Nic

nicolas10 wrote:Slick, tell me: After how many coincidences does it cease to be a coincidence? Tell me a number and I'll keep digging until I reach it.

Nic

coincidences are just that, and the ones you 'dig up' aren't even significantly coincidental.