Page 8 of 8

Re: Here ya go Nic.....

Posted: Thu Nov 22, 2012 9:26 pm
by Pudfark
callmeslick wrote:
nicolas10 wrote:Slick, tell me: After how many coincidences does it cease to be a coincidence? Tell me a number and I'll keep digging until I reach it.

Nic

coincidences are just that, and the ones you 'dig up' aren't even significantly coincidental.
The proof of what Slick said above?
What was known by few and told by some, back in September of 2012?
Two months ago.....
Compared to what you know now (what's been discovered since) is what?
Same as what Slick knows............nothing. Which, by the way...is the same as me.
This leads to the question?
Why don't we know?
Which now comes full circle back.....to September and what Nic brought to the table.

Old Pudfark sez: " Yup, it's just a coincidence...that nobody knows nuthin...after two months. The fact that Slick don't know nuthing about it neither? Well that's just a coincidence two. "

Re: Here ya go Nic.....

Posted: Thu Nov 22, 2012 9:37 pm
by Pudfark
@Nic

In the real world...the one you and I live in.

One coincidence is just that.

Two coincidences in a row? Well, ya should'a bought a lottery ticket instead.

Three coincidences in a row? That's a pattern, not a coincidence.

Four or more coincidences in a row? That's Obama Politics with a Slick sell.

Folks who believe in a pattern of coincidences? Often succumb to "Slickle Cell".

"Slickle Cell" is highly contagious and very difficult to diagnose...as most folks, think
it's a coincidence. ;)

Re: Here ya go Nic.....

Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2012 6:50 pm
by callmeslick
Wow,another coincidence!!!
http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/11 ... uries?lite

posted before you wingnuts speculate on what the worker knew about Middle Eastern terrorist cells and the like. :roll:

Re: Here ya go Nic.....

Posted: Sun Nov 25, 2012 2:37 am
by Pudfark
The problem with your analogy/example Slick?

It's not from a credible organization...

However, I do understand your desire to "cloud" the issue with
some more smoke.... ;)