SANDY HOOK FATHER OWNS CONGRESS

User avatar
callmeslick
Posts: 16473
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:02 pm
Location: Fearing and loathing in Delaware and Virginia.

Re: SANDY HOOK FATHER OWNS CONGRESS

Post by callmeslick »

clearly, you all have gotten down to the level where I will take the advice in my sig, and sit back and watch the Sopranos on HBOSG......

oh, and Res, I wonder how many here realize that the NRA represents GUN MANUFACTURERS.
Pudfark wrote: Mon May 29, 2017 11:15 am I live in Texas....you live in America.
Barfly
Posts: 686
Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2010 9:33 pm

Re: SANDY HOOK FATHER OWNS CONGRESS

Post by Barfly »

callmeslick wrote:
Barfly wrote:Restricting people's ability to defend themselves is anti-constitutional, anti-American, and pro-regressive like your effeminate President, his puppeteers, and water carriers. Carry on, water-boy.
explain, and better still, provide examples of anyone using an assault-type rifle for self-defense. I know of one, exactly one. There is nothing, by the way, in the Constitution that prevents the People from deciding certain weaponry is restricted from public ownership. Nice of you to call an effective, intelligent man 'effeminate'. Compensating for some personal issues, are we?
Try the LA riots, '91 if I recall. The most disgusting thing about that episode of local anarchy, was how many people who didn't live there urgently felt the need to go into un-policed areas and steal to "get some of theirs", just because the opportunity existed. The amount of mayhem there far exceeded the police's ability to assist in maintaining order - you were on your own, in some cases business owners protected their property and lives with weapons, including what you would call 'assault rifles ' which were the perfect self defense tool for that scenario. Not sure if any were AR-15 clones, but that's irrelevant, isn't it?

On Obama being effeminate: he would have a problem with his kid playing football... why is that?

http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/88865 ... y-football

Say he likes football but what doesn't he like about it... it's violent, aggressive, physical, competitive, teaches life lessons like any great sport, and is pretty damn safe overall.

And he's really uncomfortable around guns - according to a witness that saw him in the skeet area at Camp David.

And he's an incessant nanny/mommy-state promoter. You think he appeals to women because he's masculine? He' Me-chelle's house bitch if you ask me., lol.
User avatar
Buzz
Posts: 2240
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 1:37 pm
Location: Colorado

Re: SANDY HOOK FATHER OWNS CONGRESS

Post by Buzz »

I'll tell you why nobody has used shotguns. Because assault guns are available. Take them away and see what they use.

Another reason could be these kids grow up on video games that use assault guns. That might be a stretch, but I don't rule it out.

Your experts are full of it. Assault guns are the number one predator gun used now. I use a muzzleloader to kill coyotes, but i'm not trying to sell the pelts.

Please don't say i'm full of shit until you have some way to prove it. Up until now you haven't come close.

You also don't seem to be good at looking at the future. You seem to think if assault guns are banned that the world will be back to Leave it to Beaver? It won't! It will be the same as it is now. So, the jerks in Washington will think they need more bans, then more and more. Wake up!
User avatar
Buzz
Posts: 2240
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 1:37 pm
Location: Colorado

Re: SANDY HOOK FATHER OWNS CONGRESS

Post by Buzz »

I forgot to add something about the shotguns slick.

Killers aren't hunting ducks. They're hunting people. The stock and barrel will be shortened. It will maneuver as well as the AR, and with the choke cut off. It will spread the buckshot even better.
Barfly
Posts: 686
Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2010 9:33 pm

Re: SANDY HOOK FATHER OWNS CONGRESS

Post by Barfly »

callmeslick wrote:clearly, you all have gotten down to the level where I will take the advice in my sig, and sit back and watch the Sopranos on HBOSG......

oh, and Res, I wonder how many here realize that the NRA represents GUN MANUFACTURERS.
"Never argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience"
~Mark Twain


Well you went on and on arguing right into the area covered by Twain's second sentence above...so you are admitting defeat, lol.
Pudfark

Re: SANDY HOOK FATHER OWNS CONGRESS

Post by Pudfark »

Slick: "no, those lightweight, high velo city guns and very large magazines were NOT commonly available on the public market until the past 10 or 15 years. At least based on the outdoor stores I go to, all of which sell a range of weapons.
Basically, and I said this to the face of Ted Nugent at an outdoor show, the AR-15 clones are cowards guns. Pussy's guns. Wannabe's guns. Fakers gun, and psychopath's guns. Nothing more. Buzz points out that some folks use them for coyote hunting. I've also heard the discussion around small game hunting at the Club. The real, serious hunters just burst out laughing and said, "if you need that shit, you have no business hunting". Not hunting for any mammals, I can't venture an expert's view, but I'll accept theirs."
____________________________________________________________________
Ya ever hear of a M1 Carbine? Caliber .30 with 15 or 30 round magazines...very popular issue semi-auto rifle. A WWII favorite for it's light weight and high magazine
capacity. Sold by the tens of thousands after the war. They also had the M2 version which was full auto.

Ya ever hear of a M14 or the same M1A Springfield...both in caliber .30 with 20 round magazines and semi-auto...was used in Vietnam by the Marines and some Army units early in the war.


Nice to know, what you think of our Military Folks.

Your friends sound like a real hoot. They also sound just like you, all mouth and no experience, which qualifies them to render an opinion to folks like you. Real people who have problems with coyotes, wolves or other vermin/varmints of the like don't believe in a fair hunt or chase...they gun that shit down as fast as they can. To them, it's all about efficiency and their time is worth more than the ammo they burn.

Slick...if you're as careless with your money...as you are with your opinions on this subject? I hope yer wife handles the money. ;)
User avatar
callmeslick
Posts: 16473
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:02 pm
Location: Fearing and loathing in Delaware and Virginia.

Re: SANDY HOOK FATHER OWNS CONGRESS

Post by callmeslick »

Barfly wrote: On Obama being effeminate: he would have a problem with his kid playing football... why is that?

http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/88865 ... y-football
not the words, 'Not sure', and also, you MUST be aware that several former NFL players hold the same exact position.
Say he likes football but what doesn't he like about it... it's violent, aggressive, physical, competitive, teaches life lessons like any great sport, and is pretty damn safe overall.
which is why the NFL is facing lawsuits, as are several NCAA institutions and some high schools. Now, dammit, I love to watch football, but as a parent, I might have reservations, too, given current data on head injuries and all. There are OTHER sports, you know, like baseball, basketball, etc that teach the same life lessons, and, yes, I agree with you about the values inparted by sports. Obama himself agrees too, I am quite certain. He talks about it, in terms of basketball, frequently.
And he's really uncomfortable around guns - according to a witness that saw him in the skeet area at Camp David.
fifth hand knowledge, and really, who the fuck cares?
And he's an incessant nanny/mommy-state promoter. You think he appeals to women because he's masculine? He' Me-chelle's house bitch if you ask me., lol.
and your duly elected President.....get over that fact, and get used to the idea of a women coming along in 4 years, and it ain't Condi.
Pudfark wrote: Mon May 29, 2017 11:15 am I live in Texas....you live in America.
User avatar
callmeslick
Posts: 16473
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:02 pm
Location: Fearing and loathing in Delaware and Virginia.

Re: SANDY HOOK FATHER OWNS CONGRESS

Post by callmeslick »

@Buzz and Pud--your last posts last night were so stupid as to almost not need rebuttal, but let me leave it with this--
Buzz, you keep insisting that I am predicting a return to peaceful tranquility without assault rifles. I keep saying that is NOT my expectation, but merely a lessening in likelihood of some heinous events. That's all I expect, and have stated it about 50 times here, so why do you feel the need to lie about that?

Pud, thanks for illustrating my point, in two ways. You state that my position on assault weapons somehow disrespects our troops? You know, the military who uses those weapons for duck hunting and varmit shooting? They have such weapons for battlefield use. My nation is not a battlefield, so in my mind, you cheapen their service with the very comparison. Second, most of the members of my club reside in the Central PA hills(not some sort of country club Sportsmans Club), and keep at bay varmits from coyotes to rattlesnakes, along with hunting for deer, elk and bear. That you gladly demean them for some ignorant purpose that eludes me, merely because longtime outdoorsman think your argument is as nutty as Aunt Janet's fruitcake shows how truly empty your argument is.
Pudfark wrote: Mon May 29, 2017 11:15 am I live in Texas....you live in America.
Pudfark

Re: SANDY HOOK FATHER OWNS CONGRESS

Post by Pudfark »

Slick yer position, missionary, disrespects responsible people.

Here's what you irresponsible folks need to do...in order to "feel" safe/covered.
1. Obtain/purchase some Level V body armor.
2. One box of "Depends".
3. Script for Valium
4. Pray
5. Term Life Insurance

That'll make ya feel better, won't infringe on the responsible folks.
User avatar
Buzz
Posts: 2240
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 1:37 pm
Location: Colorado

Re: SANDY HOOK FATHER OWNS CONGRESS

Post by Buzz »

So, now i'm stupid, and a liar.

I now see you the way others see you on this forum. I gave you the benefit of the doubt all this time, but no more.

Not sure why HH has you on ignore? You two have so much in common.

You're sig really does apply to you. I won't be dragged down to your level.
Post Reply