Page 10 of 10

Re: The attack at Ft. Hood

Posted: Thu Nov 12, 2009 8:33 pm
by Pudfark
"Give Stern a rest"...now, thats funny right there..... :lol:

Re: The attack at Ft. Hood

Posted: Thu Nov 12, 2009 8:38 pm
by callmeslick
it has been a topic, far in the past, among Ruggie, myself and others. :)

Re: The attack at Ft. Hood

Posted: Thu Nov 12, 2009 8:59 pm
by HappyHappy
callmeslick something tells me that you think the idea of all US military being disarmed while on post
is a good idea. Clinton signed that into law in 1993.
When I was in the USAF all US Army and Marine grunts had a rifle or a side arm on them
while on duty, that means nearly at all times.

I doubt that rag head would have got far if everyone was armed.

HH

Re: The attack at Ft. Hood

Posted: Thu Nov 12, 2009 9:02 pm
by callmeslick
HappyHappy wrote:callmeslick something tells me that you think the idea of all US military being disarmed while on post
is a good idea. Clinton signed that into law in 1993.
When I was in the USAF all US Army and Marine grunts had a rifle or a side arm on them
while on duty, that means nearly at all times.

I doubt that rag head would have got far if everyone was armed.

HH
I don't know what gave you that insight. Actually, I wouldn't like to think that a base would be all that vulnerable, stateside, so that MP's couldn't handle it. At any rate, that isn't what is being discussed here.

Re: The attack at Ft. Hood

Posted: Fri Nov 13, 2009 8:56 pm
by fatman
Well the dude is paralysed never to walk again and apparently is in some pain lets just hope they short change him on his pain meds

http://www.news.com.au/story/0,27574,26 ... 09,00.html