A Complete Waste of Space

Typical of the left.

http://www.climatechangefraud.com/clima ... -disgraced

and how subtle a ruse, imbellishing the truth by several hunrded degrees farhenheit

"A beleaguered federal agency appears to be implicated in the most blatant and extreme case of climate data fraud yet seen. Official records have been confirmed as evidence that a handful of temperature records for the Great Lakes region have been hiked up by literally hundreds of degrees to substantially inflate the average temperature range for the northeastern United States."

I wonder, how many of them will go to jail for falsifying government documents? Oh, that's right, Obama don't prosecute the like minded........

Old Pudfark sez: " What is integrity? It's what conservatives have..........and..........what liberals want to buy. "

Pudfark wrote: What is integrity?

That's the same thing that Rangel and Waters have been asking. Seems they have no clue what it is.

you could read the paper that goes with it, if you want. The 'falsified' data is shown in the paper as to not be used in calculations, or to have any meaning at all. Those shaded boxes with the wierd numbers were readings when weather conditions prevented accurate functioning of the equipment used in the study.

what this is, is another example of where science is science, neither 'right' nor 'left', merely collecting data and studying it. When assclowns start interfering in the process for ANY political purpose(in this case to make a right-wing point that is yet another lie....attaboy, ruggie!), for ANY agenda, science suffers.

It's scientists getting caught falsifying data. Same thing happened not long ago with other global warming scientists. You remember the leaked e-mails and stuff don't ya? Actually, it doesn't matter if you do. You are in denial.

ruggbutt wrote:It's scientists getting caught falsifying data. Same thing happened not long ago with other global warming scientists. You remember the leaked e-mails and stuff don't ya? Actually, it doesn't matter if you do. You are in denial.

you clearly don't understand science, or how it works, so best to stop now. Or, read the papers themselves, and not some political hack 'interpretation' of same.

Who chose to "present" the data?

callmeslick wrote:you clearly don't understand science, or how it works

Funny thing is you don't. And you're supposed to be someone who works in that field. Explain how Antarctic ice is more prevalent than it has been in the last century when we have global warming. You can't, you're a dumbfuck of epic proportions.

ruggbutt wrote: Explain how Antarctic ice is more prevalent than it has been in the last century when we have global warming. .

another bogus statistic, which counts as 'Antarctic Ice' massive chunks that are floating away from the continent. The intact continental ice mass has dropped by around 20% in the past 50 years, and average temps are up, within the ice core, dramatically.

On this note, I'll depart for the night. My grandson has just arrived for an evening with Grandpa and Grandma. He's all of 6 weeks old, and intellectually light years ahead of where you, Ruggie, have fallen to.