A Complete Waste of Space

Was long over due, discuss the mertits of terrorists being lauded as national hero's

http://www.news.com.au/world/nelson-man ... 5995861053

if you had to live under apartheid, you'd either be a terrorist, too, or a complete pussy.

What so you are justifying his actions? I guess you admire the hadjis in Afghanistan for fighting the occupying force

callmeslick wrote:if you had to live under apartheid, you'd either be a terrorist, too, or a complete pussy.

are we voting on this

fatman wrote:What so you are justifying his actions? I guess you admire the hadjis in Afghanistan for fighting the occupying force

Of course he is. That's what liberal douches do.

fatman wrote:What so you are justifying his actions? I guess you admire the hadjis in Afghanistan for fighting the occupying force

When 2% of the population consisting of whites is brutally surpressing, forcing work and housing restrictions and beating the living shit out of the 98% which are black, something has to give. Mandela, if I recall correctly, supported peaceful means until such were brutally repressed.
As for Afghans, they have a long history of resisting occupying forces. It's just tragic in the most recent case that they didn't resist a group of religious fanatics which were home-grown when they took over. Still and all, a FAR different case than South Africa.

ruggbutt wrote:

fatman wrote:What so you are justifying his actions? I guess you admire the hadjis in Afghanistan for fighting the occupying force

Of course he is. That's what liberal douches do.

moron

You, for years, on these pages have suggested that if faced with government oppression, would be willing to shoot it out(no doubt in complete futility, as you're an idiot) with them. The white Afrikaners were oppressive assholes, at least the ones in charge. What did the black populace do that you haven't said you would do?
There were limited weapons at their disposal, so they used the means at hand. Essentially, that illustrates the absolute difficulty of declaring some folks 'terrorists'. There is a moral component, or ought to be. The black South Africans clearly had moral superiority on their side of the argument. Likewise, some case can be made for the Palestinians and a few other cases around the world. In my opinion, it only becomes morally wrong if it applies to a minority attempting to disrupt a majority who constitute a legal and peaceful society.
An example here would be most of the Muslim extremists in the western world. Returning to Fatman's question about Afghanistan, I'd ask: Which foreign occupation are you referring to, the present, or the Russians, or the British, or......?