A Complete Waste of Space

When assault rifles are banned, and some mental case go on another shooting with a semi auto shotgun loaded with buckshot?

Shotgun ban?

I want to see how someone, armed with a shotgun, manages to kill a shitload of people in the same fashion as, say, CT or Colorado examples. Not to say it couldn't happen, but sure haven't seen anyone come close or even try. Have you?

Buckshot could kill 2-3 with one shot. Some shotguns can hold 10 rounds. Do the math.

So, if only 15 kids were killed. That's ok?

There's no end to this is those dummies in Washington is going to blame the gun.

How about 3-4 Glocks?

Complete ban is what they want. Assault rifles is only the beginning.

callmeslick wrote:I want to see how someone, armed with a shotgun, manages to kill a shitload of people in the same fashion as, say, CT or Colorado examples. Not to say it couldn't happen, but sure haven't seen anyone come close or even try. Have you?

Not exactly the first best sentence you've ever written, ya think?

Go watch Arnold in the Terminator movie.
Ask a marine...nicely.
Ask the police...nicely.

Go ask some pimply faced 10 year old kid who plays "ARMA".

Buzz wrote:Buckshot could kill 2-3 with one shot. Some shotguns can hold 10 rounds. Do the math.

I can do the math, Buzz(I own two shotguns, both duck guns and hence plugged at 3 rounds), but it hasn't happened yet. Why?

There have been other options. Take those options away, and you might see it. Although, I hope not.

You know what my point is. It's not going to stop by banning certain guns. They want them all.

who is they, and when is one of you going to provide REAL PROOF?

Now you sound like HH.

sorry about that, but I ask a real question: How can you loons persist in stating that 'they'(the great,undefined, 'they) want to ban all guns, without providing one shred of proof that anyone in any position of power holds that opinion. Further, it might be nice if you could come up with the slightest evidence that anyone of any power has ever proposed a plan to do so. Until then, y'all are blowing smoke out of your collective asses.

They = Government



You didn't like the links I posted?

When Obama tries for something, fails, back steps, changes his mind, doesn't mean he doesn't still want it. He just needs to try it a different way which he thinks will work.

Oh, and lets not forget that the election got in the way, and it wasn't good for votes. Now he can try again.

I don't see the 2nd amendment getting the respect it should anymore.

Answer me this slick. What do you think Obama would do about guns if it didn't have to be voted on, and was completely his decision to make?