Page 1 of 3

liar in chief strikes again

Posted: Thu May 16, 2013 7:34 am
by CUDA
President Obama announced Wednesday during an unscheduled presser that he had requested — and received — the resignation of Steven Miller, acting Internal Revenue Service commissioner.
Liar

Acting secretary Miller. By law had to leave office in June. His position was always a temporary one. The president is playing a charade, trying to make people think he's doing something and feigning anger over this.
Plus when you fire someone don't they pack up and leave immediately? Then why is this guy sticking around for another 2 weeks.

Re: liar in chief strikes again

Posted: Thu May 16, 2013 9:05 am
by Pudfark
Exactly Correct CUDA.

Re: liar in chief strikes again

Posted: Thu May 16, 2013 9:38 am
by Pudfark
When Did The 'Micromanaging President' Become 'President Passerby'?

http://www.breitbart.com/InstaBlog/2013 ... t-Passerby

Excerpt from above:

White House also didn’t know that terror training camps were sprouting up all around the Benghazi consulate, or anything about the 200+ attacks in Libya prior to the 9/11 attack. The White House certainly didn’t know about the security requests.

And we can go on and on.

Obama didn’t know his BFFs Jay-Z and Beyonce were going to Communist Cuba on holiday. He doesn’t know how they got the visa to go.

The White House said that in the Boston terror attack there was no indication of terrorist activity. They didn’t know about the Russians’ warnings to us about Tamerlan Tsarnaev.

The White House didn’t know about the thousands of illegals who were recently released from prison by Janet Napolitano as part of the faux sequester cuts.

The White House absolutely didn’t deceive over the impact of sequester. They didn’t know anything. The White House said they didn’t cancel the White House tours.

The White House didn’t know anything about the Petraeus scandal. They conveniently learned about it the Wednesday after the election. The DOJ was investigating the Director of the CIA and the White House didn’t know.

The White House didn’t know about the Fast & Furious operation.

The White House didn’t know about the SEC/Goldman Sachs charges until after they were made public.

The White House didn’t know it had ordered General Stanley McChrystal to ”Defeat the Taliban. Secure the Population.”

The White House didn’t know that Jon Corzine was a raging incompetent. In fact, Joe Biden said that he was the first one they called when they had a financial question.

The White House didn’t know a Mao Tse-Tung ornament was hanging on their Christmas tree for three years in a row though it was mentioned each year.

In 2011, Barack Obama told Bob Woodward that he regretted criticizing Paul Ryan at his budget speech last year. Obama said he would not have attacked Paul Ryan if he would have known Ryan was going to attend the speech. It’s quite miraculous that Obama didn’t know because Obama personally invited Paul Ryan to hear his speech.

Barack Obama didn’t know Bill Ayers was a domestic terrorist even though they were colleagues and Ayers launched Obama’s career.

Barack didn’t know about Jeremiah Wright’s anti-white, anti-Jewish rants even though he sat in his church for 20 years.

Barack has carried that ability to not know into the White House – he didn’t know a member of a terrorist Muslim group was invited to the White House for a meeting with senior aides. Barack just didn’t know.

This is a "know it all" president until the information he knows become inconvenient. Then he becomes "the passerby president."

I ain't buying it.

Nobody else is buying it either. Not even, Slick.

Re: liar in chief strikes again

Posted: Thu May 16, 2013 10:24 am
by CUDA
Pudfark wrote:Exactly Correct CUDA.
I suppose slick would say.

he didn't lie because the President was required to ask for his resignation before his temporary term was up.

But I suppose we'll never know what slick would say because ;) ;) "he has left this forum" ;) ;)

Re: liar in chief strikes again

Posted: Thu May 16, 2013 12:58 pm
by HappyHappy
Callmesick has no problem with lies, cheats, thieves and racists
as long as they are Democrats.

HH

Re: liar in chief strikes again

Posted: Thu May 16, 2013 3:00 pm
by Pudfark
Well in Slick's defense....I'm sure he's out there troll'n the "progressive blogs" trying to "drum up" some opinions that he can misrepresent as facts so as to put us "back" in our place.

More likely though....he sneezed and shit himself and is too embarrassed to come back.... ;)

Re: liar in chief strikes again

Posted: Thu May 16, 2013 6:11 pm
by callmeslick
obsess much?......three references in as many posts to a member that isn't participating anymore(out of sheer boredom). Sorta reminds me of some folks who used to post here and went to the 'other' place. :lol: :lol: :lol:

party on, dudes.

Re: liar in chief strikes again

Posted: Thu May 16, 2013 6:24 pm
by Reservoir_Dog
callmeslick wrote:obsess much?......three references in as many posts to a member that isn't participating anymore(out of sheer boredom).
You're all they've got. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: liar in chief strikes again

Posted: Thu May 16, 2013 6:38 pm
by callmeslick
prolly right, Res.....just for old times sake-
Image

Re: liar in chief strikes again

Posted: Thu May 16, 2013 7:23 pm
by Pudfark
You don't belong here anymore Slick.... :lol:
Remember......you quit. :oops:

Remember...all the crap you threw at folks?
Seem quite apparent, you can't take it.

Bye Bye... ;)