Page 1 of 1

The Antidote

Posted: Thu Feb 27, 2014 4:16 pm
by Pudfark
TEXAS: THE ANTIDOTE TO THE SOFT TYRANNY GRIPPING AMERICA

In Democracy in America, Alexis de Tocqueville worried that someday America would lose its liberty to “…a network of small complicated rules…” reducing citizens to sheep with the government their “shepherd.” He termed this soft tyranny or despotism.

Today, the federal government has more than 180,000 complicated rules, not all of them small. In 1979, we had “only” 30,000. That was the year the late U.S. Senator Eugene McCarthy (D-MN) said, “The only thing that saves us from the bureaucracy is inefficiency. An efficient bureaucracy is the greatest threat to liberty.”

In our modern republic, regulations have largely supplanted law. The thought that well-trained technocrats would run government has its origins in the Progressive era and men such as President Woodrow Wilson who saw the Constitution as an archaic document, one that was insufficient to the industrial age. Wilson especially viewed the Constitution’s separation of powers, balancing one branch of government off against the other, as worthy of scorn.

Read the rest of this below...it gets better:
http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-Texa ... ng-America

Old Pudfark sez: " This coming fall...is going to be a rout of the Democrat route/root..in this country.. "

Footnote: A few months ago...I would have speculated that the only event that could save the Democratic party? Would be a "war" and that could'a been true? Now, No. The Dem's have slashed the military budget and troops to historic lows, so that ain't gonna happen. If we should survive such an event as "war"? The Dem's are gone....for a long, long time.

Re: The Antidote

Posted: Fri Feb 28, 2014 12:08 pm
by callmeslick
most of those 'rules' are stuff to protect the citizenry from the abuse of unfettered capitalism. You know, stuff like drug regulations, food safety regs, environmental regs, and the like. Most folks screaming about them are total idiots, and those who are serious are merely trying to maximize profits on the backs of the general public.

Re: The Antidote

Posted: Fri Feb 28, 2014 2:21 pm
by Pudfark
Most of them are from the IRS and ACA/ObamaCare.... ;)

Re: The Antidote

Posted: Fri Feb 28, 2014 2:30 pm
by callmeslick
sorry, but no they aren't. Feel free to post detailed numbers and breakdowns should you wish to prove that you aren't talking out your ass again.



here's a clue, from your own post, before you step in any more shit: the comparison in numbers is between now(2014, to save you locating a calender) and 1979

also, the IRS doesn't make 'regulations', and of course, the ACA only came out a few years ago, and would have to have put in over 27 regulations per page to account for the numbers cited.

Re: The Antidote

Posted: Fri Feb 28, 2014 2:36 pm
by callmeslick
Oh, and specify what define a Democratic rout, and we might make a wager..... :lol:


I'll assert right here that the Dems win more Governorships in the fall than they currently hold, will retain the Senate. The House remains to be seen, but depending on the self-destructive GOP of late, the Dems might take that back this year. Now, looking to 2016, I'll guarantee you a Dem president, a Dem massacre to filibuster-proof levels in the Senate, and retaking the house. GUARANTEE.

Re: The Antidote

Posted: Fri Feb 28, 2014 5:31 pm
by Pudfark
callmeslick wrote:sorry, but no they aren't. Feel free to post detailed numbers and breakdowns should you wish to prove that you aren't talking out your ass again.
:lol: I'm just behaving.......like you. :lol:
Other'n calling ya names....drifting the subject...and of course, blaming Bush.... ;)

Re: The Antidote

Posted: Fri Feb 28, 2014 5:43 pm
by callmeslick
yup, talking out your ass again, just like the election prediction. I note you don't have the balls to come up with a prediction or make a public wager.

Re: The Antidote

Posted: Fri Feb 28, 2014 7:45 pm
by Pudfark
Why would anybody...bet on any race...not knowing, who is "running"?
Oh...snap! You did......on Obama......see where that got everybody. ;)

I believe I'll wait a bit....to take ya up on yer offer. 8-)

Re: The Antidote

Posted: Sat Mar 01, 2014 10:21 am
by callmeslick
fair enough, Pud.....my money is on the table(and, just to review the traditional rules, loser pays a charity in winners name).

Re: The Antidote

Posted: Sat Mar 01, 2014 2:31 pm
by Pudfark
Should I accept the wager? I'll abide by the "conditions". :)