A Complete Waste of Space

....about that British sniper....ah, feck it.


apparently, no one has a comment about another shooting at Fort Hood. Hmmmm, why? I mean, the guy had long-standing mental issues, was in active treatment and had active prescriptions of psychoactive drugs. Still, he was able to buy a gun in Texas. What a country!!! Just what the Founders had in mind when they wrote the 2nd Amendment, no doubt.

Pud and Slappy are waiting until Fox tells them how to respond.

Yes indeed there is a pattern in most alledged shootings: psychoactive drugs. I say ban them.

Nic

I think you are being facetious, Nic, but actually, there should be FAR more careful use.

callmeslick wrote:....about that British sniper....ah, feck it.


apparently, no one has a comment about another shooting at Fort Hood. Hmmmm, why? I mean, the guy had long-standing mental issues, was in active treatment and had active prescriptions of psychoactive drugs. Still, he was able to buy a gun in Texas. What a country!!! Just what the Founders had in mind when they wrote the 2nd Amendment, no doubt.

Well, I do.
What do ya call...in reference time wise? "long-standing"?
Why is it...over the last 5-6 years...the "commander in chief" has allowed/mandated that the Army be so "politcally correct" as to overlook the mental cases it has acquired and not be allowed to immediately discharge them? Reference Ft. Hood times two.
Next....Mental cases don't follow the law. The law ain't applicable to them, if, they are in fact, a mental case.
He could have bought a gun in Delaware or anywhere.
The 2nd Amendment is there to protect us/U.S. from the mental case commander in chief.

no doubt. you now have a better understanding...

callmeslick wrote:I think you are being facetious, Nic, but actually, there should be FAR more careful use.

I was indeed, but that doesn't make it false.

Nic

In regards to the latest fort hood shooting apparently the dude had a red cross letter for his mothers funeral and was denied leave