Page 1 of 3

Keystone Pipeline

Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2014 7:12 am
by HappyHappy
Since the scratched record style posts have died down lets turn to another HOT topic.
Seems the Labor Union (the real Communists) are pissed at the top Communist (Osama Obama)
for stalling the Keystone. I see it as more anti vampire medicine to kill off Democrats in 2014 and 2016.

HH

Re: Keystone Pipeline

Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2014 12:19 pm
by Pudfark
Keystone....will be the key stone around the neck of Obama's legacy.
It's the obvious explain to Obama's blatant contempt for Canadians and Union Workers.
Then ya factor in the European's immediate need fer natural gas......because of the Obama bungle
in the Ukraine? It really becomes apparent....that Obama has no concern...that folks here and world wide,
will be burning their furniture...next winter....to stay warm.

Old Pudfark sez: " It's all about the matches... " ;)

Re: Keystone Pipeline

Posted: Sun Apr 27, 2014 4:34 am
by fatman
HappyHappy wrote:lets turn to another HOT topic.
What hot topic just build the thing whats the hold up is he holding votes hostage or something

Re: Keystone Pipeline

Posted: Mon May 05, 2014 2:14 pm
by Pudfark
Dem Sen. Manchin signals bill to build Keystone could have the votes

A Democratic senator suggested Sunday that the Senate might have enough votes to pass a bill compelling the Obama administration to approve the Keystone XL pipeline.

Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., noting that 62 senators voted in favor of a Keystone measure last year, said: "I still think that vote is there. I really do."

Manchin discussed the prospects just days after his Senate colleagues introduced a bill to build the Canada-to-Texas pipeline. The difference between the measure approved last year and this one is that last year's was a nonbinding resolution with no real teeth to it.

The new Senate bill would require approval of Keystone. Getting a filibuster-proof, 60-vote majority on board with such a bill is a heavier lift for sponsors.

But Manchin said he "would hope" that a few more Democrats would be willing to support it, and even suggested it could be a positive step for the White House.

"We don't want to usurp anyone's power, but if it gives the White House some protection from the environmental community coming after them, sooner or later you've got to give to the will of the people," Manchin said.

Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, said a vote on a free-standing bill that deals only with the pipeline is insufficient "because it will never see the light of day. The president's not going to sign it."

Though the approval decision has been described as resting with the State Department, Manchin said Sunday that nobody in Washington believes environmental decisions are being made at that level.

"This is coming strictly from the White House," he said. "That's where it lies. If we had the green light from the White House, this would happen."

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/05 ... ave-votes/

Seems...there might be a little revolt in the "communist" party..... ;)

Re: Keystone Pipeline

Posted: Thu May 15, 2014 7:43 pm
by HappyHappy
This and Demo-Care will be the stones that kill off the Commies this fall.

HH

Re: Keystone Pipeline

Posted: Fri May 16, 2014 8:57 am
by callmeslick
sure, a healthcare insurance plan that is becoming more popular by the month, and a pipeline that isn't needed and creates 80 permanent jobs. Nice fallback. :lol: :lol: :lol:


ask yourself this: what POSITIVES do the GOP candidates have to offer. What are they going to do GOOD for the nation, what proposals do they have for jobs, energy, healthcare, immigration or foreign policy? That's right, NOTHING. Zero, nada, zilch. You can't run on that and win very often.

Re: Keystone Pipeline

Posted: Fri May 16, 2014 9:47 am
by callmeslick

Re: Keystone Pipeline

Posted: Fri May 16, 2014 11:35 am
by Pudfark
callmeslick wrote:sure, a healthcare insurance plan that is becoming more popular by the month, and a pipeline that isn't needed and creates 80 permanent jobs. Nice fallback. :lol: :lol: :lol:


ask yourself this: what POSITIVES do the GOP candidates have to offer. What are they going to do GOOD for the nation, what proposals do they have for jobs, energy, healthcare, immigration or foreign policy? That's right, NOTHING. Zero, nada, zilch. You can't run on that and win very often.
That there bolded part is a funnier than hell...contradiction. :lol:

We can only wish that the last six years were this...instead of? :idea:

Re: Keystone Pipeline

Posted: Fri May 16, 2014 1:51 pm
by Darkhorse

Re: Keystone Pipeline

Posted: Fri May 16, 2014 5:07 pm
by callmeslick
kinda makes you wonder if they're both seeing the same reality, huh?