A Complete Waste of Space

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/06 ... us-allies/

For the sake of discussion........?

Let's say the lib's may have been "right" on the last Gulf War? "We shouldn't have been there in the first place"? Let's say that "humanitarian" reasons weren't sufficient to support the quest for WMD's? Let's say it was used as an excuse...to go? Let's ask? When no WMD's were found? Why didn't we leave? Could it be said? That in this rare instance/occurrence? The lib's were "right" and we should'a "left"?

If the above were proven true? What's being discussed now, in the link provided? Is it wrong, right or a rite to do wrong again?

Old Pudfark sez: " It's a pattern of bad behavior and it's write. "

the bigger question is when are we as Americans
going to recognise that the criminal Islamic Marxist
regime that runs this country only cares about getting elected
and nothing else?

As to the ISIS surge in Iraq, they are Obama's people, he will do nothing.

HH

HappyHappy wrote:the bigger question is when are we as Americans
going to recognise that the criminal Islamic Marxist
regime that runs this country only cares about getting elected
and nothing else?

Oh, yeah ... sure. Because, you know ... Republicans don't give a flying fuck about getting elected and always do the right thing!

Reservoir_Dog wrote:

HappyHappy wrote:the bigger question is when are we as Americans
going to recognise that the criminal Islamic Marxist
regime that runs this country only cares about getting elected
and nothing else?

Oh, yeah ... sure. Because, you know ... Republicans don't give a flying fuck about getting elected and always do the right thing!

Few Repub's in office....Many Dem's in orifice....
Yet again...HH has "one upped ya"..R_D.
Seems ya failed...after years of complaining...you flailed to notice, that I served up a subject on a neutral platter...
Thanx fer the encouragement buddie...(.)

Pudfark wrote:Few Repub's in office....Many Dem's in orifice....

And you wonder why I don't take you seriously.

Pudfark wrote:Yet again...HH has "one upped ya"..R_D.

Really? You agree with Nappy-Boy that a criminal Islamic Marxist regime runs your country? How sad for you.

Pudfark wrote:Seems ya failed...after years of complaining...you flailed to notice, that I served up a subject on a neutral platter...

No. I didn't fail to notice.
I just know that your attempt is completely insincere.

I could not agree with you more, it is really sad
that a criminal Islamic Marxist
regime runs this country.

HH

HappyHappy wrote:I could not agree with you more, it is really sad
that a criminal Islamic Marxist
regime runs this country.

HH

Obama's IRS, Border Criminality and 'The People vs. Barack Obama'

Here’s the reality: the DOJ will not investigate, and the Obama administration will never sanction a special prosecutor. Which means that, as usual, the executive branch is entirely unanswerable for its crimes. Unless we do something.

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government ... awbreaking

Posted fer the benefit of the Canadian "missing link".

it's more than merely Pud and Slappy, Res.....stuff like the above is why there are 'few' Repubs in office, going to be fewer every year. The right has become a laughing stock for the rest of us.

callmeslick wrote:it's more than merely Pud and Slappy, Res.....stuff like the above is why there are 'few' Repubs in office, going to be fewer every year. The right has become a laughing stock for the rest of us.

and the next couple of years is gonna be a comedy.
Hillary needs to write a couple more books and she'll be a middle eastern "shoe in".

All of which is amusing....and proof that feather heads...don't know their rite from their wrong.
Cantor disease.