CallinSick
Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2014 1:53 pm
Sublime Opinions of the Masses (give or take a few)
https://acompletewasteofspace.com/
That makes no sense and ain't factually correct. That's like saying the Normandy Invasion hinged on the plan submitted by NCO's. In other words....the Commander in Chief isn't responsible for a plan or direction and it's execution.... Will your theory be applied to "immigration"? What's really laughable? You point at congress....when harry reid and the senate shit can everything the congress passes and then Obama is on permanent ignore.callmeslick wrote:umm, what he said is perfectly reasonable. Unless Congress comes up with a clear plan for the region, all he has is the ability to execute military measures. That is NOT a plan, something a lot of people apparently fail to grasp. It is up to Congress, who has been dithering since before the Syrian problem got bad at making ANY committment to a long-term plan(that might extend beyond Presidential terms). Who better than to start working on a plan than, say, John McCain, which one can locate pictures of with ISIS leaders from a year and a half back.
um, no, it DOES suggest that the Normandy Invasion was planned LONG after we'd settled on a strategy vs Germany and Japan, and joined a coalition with defined roles and goals. We wouldn't have been near Normandy had Congress not changed our neutrality policy. Once again, you display an alarming lack of understanding about how your system of government work, how your military actions are put into place and deemed acceptable, or the basic roles of Commander-in-Chief in the whole mix. Attaboy, another low-information voter!!Pudfark wrote:That makes no sense and ain't factually correct. That's like saying the Normandy Invasion hinged on the plan submitted by NCO's.
What's REALLY scary .... is that you probably actually believe that!HappyHappy wrote:Osama Obama already has a plan.
He is an Islamic mole.
callmeslick wrote:um, no, it DOES suggest that the Normandy Invasion was planned LONG after we'd settled on a strategy vs Germany and Japan, and joined a coalition with defined roles and goals. We wouldn't have been near Normandy had Congress not changed our neutrality policy. Once again, you display an alarming lack of understanding about how your system of government work, how your military actions are put into place and deemed acceptable, or the basic roles of Commander-in-Chief in the whole mix. Attaboy, another low-information voter!!Pudfark wrote:That makes no sense and ain't factually correct. That's like saying the Normandy Invasion hinged on the plan submitted by NCO's.