Page 1 of 3

B E N G H A Z I looms again, LMAO, not old news

Posted: Sun Sep 07, 2014 10:12 am
by HappyHappy
Callmeshit is going by the talking points in dismissing the Benghazi attacks and murders as old news.

But it seems the OBAMA and HILLARY do nothing tag team has blood on it's hands.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/09 ... -security/

The only good to come of this is it will DOOM Billary.

They had a team on the ground, within less than a mile, and Hillary's boy held them back......

Their deaths are signed in blood by Hillary Clinton.

Re: B E N G H A Z I looms again, LMAO, not old news

Posted: Sun Sep 07, 2014 1:21 pm
by Pudfark
Yup. Agreed.
callmeslick wrote:so what? They apparently both were for political necessity, so I repeat.....so what?
Reservoir_Dog wrote:Woof-Woof...licks Slick's butt hole...say's your stupid.[

Old Pudfark sez: " Gravity and a turd.................are predictable. "

Re: B E N G H A Z I looms again, LMAO, not old news

Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2014 10:34 pm
by Dawg
they can't even confirm where obama was.......so much for the most transparent administration in history pffft

Re: B E N G H A Z I looms again, LMAO, not old news

Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2014 8:28 am
by callmeslick
why would it matter, Dawg?

Re: B E N G H A Z I looms again, LMAO, not old news

Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2014 11:23 am
by Pudfark
Where was the skipper/captain of the "Exxon Valdez" when it ran aground?
callmeslick wrote:why would it matter?
Where was the defendant when the victim was murdered?
callmeslick wrote:why would it matter?
Where was the POTUS when our Embassy was attacked and our citizens murdered and who was responsible/accountable for the incident?
callmeslick wrote:why would it matter?
Who picked the kids up from school and where did they take them?
callmeslick wrote:why would it matter?
Why does callmeslick write here?
callmeslick wrote:why would it matter?
Old Pudfark sez: " If'n ya don't care, it don't matter. "

Re: B E N G H A Z I looms again, LMAO, not old news

Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2014 2:26 pm
by Reservoir_Dog
OMG, you clowns will swallow any pill they put in front of you.

I'm sure the security contractors - Kris (“Tanto”) Paronto, Mark (“Oz”) Geist, and John (“Tig”) Tiegen aren't doing this to sell their book. :lol:
I'm sure they're not doing this for the pile of money Fox has probably given them. :lol:
Hell no, they're not doing it to sell books. They're not doing it for cold hard cash. They're doing it out of conscience and a deep love of America, baseball and apple pie. :roll:


But then again, if they're not doing it for money and they're only doing it out of conscience and a deep love of America, baseball and apple pie ..... then where were these guys when there was half a dozen Benghazi hearings going on?


Keep drinking that Kool-Aid, dudes.

Re: B E N G H A Z I looms again, LMAO, not old news

Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2014 2:33 pm
by callmeslick
Res points out the obvious.

Re: B E N G H A Z I looms again, LMAO, not old news

Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2014 3:22 pm
by Pudfark
Reservoir_Dog wrote:OMG, you clowns will swallow any pill they put in front of you.

I'm sure the security contractors - Kris (“Tanto”) Paronto, Mark (“Oz”) Geist, and John (“Tig”) Tiegen aren't doing this to sell their book. :lol:
I'm sure they're not doing this for the pile of money Fox has probably given them. :lol:
Hell no, they're not doing it to sell books. They're not doing it for cold hard cash. They're doing it out of conscience and a deep love of America, baseball and apple pie. :roll:


But then again, if they're not doing it for money and they're only doing it out of conscience and a deep love of America, baseball and apple pie ..... then where were these guys when there was half a dozen Benghazi hearings going on?


Keep drinking that Kool-Aid, dudes.
You answered your own question "dummy". "security contractors"
They were under contract and couldn't talk....damn yer stupid, R_D.
callmeslick wrote:Res points out the obvious.
Yes, he does...he's a dummy & stupid.
So, are you....for knowingly following his lead.

:roll:

Re: B E N G H A Z I looms again, LMAO, not old news

Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2014 3:48 pm
by Reservoir_Dog
Pudfark wrote:They were under contract and couldn't talk
You can't possibly know that. The article makes no mention what-so-ever of the money-grubbers contract duration, contract stipulations or when they left their contracts. You're just pissing into the wind.
And either way, are you suggesting that they wouldn't say what really happened if they were under oath at a congressional hearing? Because if they didn't, then it's all about the money.

Keep drinking that Kool-Aid, Pud.

Re: B E N G H A Z I looms again, LMAO, not old news

Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2014 4:15 pm
by Pudfark
Very obvious...you don't know what a non-disclosure/no compete clause in a contract is or what it means. :roll:

Were you to read up a dab.....you'd know it's SOP with Obama and his downward approach to those awarded government contracts. Dummy seems applicable, yet again in regard to ewe.

In regard to the peeing contest?
You peed first, into the wind.
Then....I peed on ewe, again.