Page 1 of 2

Grammar in the political spot light

Posted: Thu Oct 08, 2015 6:04 am
by HappyHappy
This is in the latest Democratic Fascist talking points.
Attack the Republicans for errors and sloppy grammar!
I thought it was bullshit till I saw this on our local
Fascist NH TV station. No shit, "Democrats" are
resorting to playground tactics!

http://www.wmur.com/politics/which-pres ... r/35712002

The Dem's are desperate!


:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: Grammar in the political spot light

Posted: Thu Oct 08, 2015 4:30 pm
by Pudfark
Yup and when that fails to work, as it always has....it'll be name calling time, followed by the disappearing act....to frivolous rambling. :lol: :lol:

Re: Grammar in the political spot light

Posted: Thu Oct 08, 2015 4:34 pm
by callmeslick
I've been offering to wager you two clowns that the Dems win the Presidency again in 2016, no matter who the GOP runs, but neither of you has shown the balls to step up. That speaks volumes, and is rather typical of this modern 'conservative' bullshit. All talk, no balls.

Re: Grammar in the political spot light

Posted: Thu Oct 08, 2015 5:57 pm
by Pudfark
All S'wagger', no money or credibility with you.
The 'currency' here is recency of proof...not yer desperate bloated bloviating....again. :roll:

Re: Grammar in the political spot light

Posted: Thu Oct 08, 2015 7:16 pm
by callmeslick
just like I thought, NO BALLS. Put up, or shut up, Pud. Five hundred bucks to the charity of your choice if the Dems lose, you do likewise to Planned Parenthood if the GOP loses. It's easily documented, has been done here before(g00se and I come to mind). What are you afraid of(besides black people, liberals, the government, your own shadow, etc,etc)?

Re: Grammar in the political spot light

Posted: Thu Oct 08, 2015 7:18 pm
by callmeslick
oh, and Slappy, that offer goes out to you. If you choose to accept, I'll take you off ignore for a month. :lol:

Re: Grammar in the political spot light

Posted: Thu Oct 08, 2015 7:23 pm
by Pudfark
Your answer has been in my sig below for years...read it, apply it.
It's like this..your word is as good as your pretend wager....and more words from you ain't gonna change that... :oops:

Old Pudfark sez: " nothing more from you than the title you chose for this thread "Grammar in the political spot light"

Re: Grammar in the political spot light

Posted: Thu Oct 08, 2015 7:52 pm
by callmeslick
fucking coward you are......hilarious. :lol:

Re: Grammar in the political spot light

Posted: Thu Oct 08, 2015 8:07 pm
by Pudfark
as posted in the other thread....and prolly should be posted everywhere?
Pudfark wrote:I don't believe anybody would call some one a 'coward', that confronted a 'liar'.
Unless, of course, it was the 'liar'. 8-)

Re: Grammar in the political spot light

Posted: Thu Oct 08, 2015 8:09 pm
by callmeslick
bullshit. That is all you have. Gum-flapping bullshit. You state that I am a liar, yet cannot provide one shred of evidence. I offer you the chance to publcly, and for good causes, back you mouth with your money. You don't, and dance around it by calling me names. We, here in Delaware, have a name for a person like you--Ball-Less.