the headline no campaign wants to see....

User avatar
callmeslick
Posts: 16473
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:02 pm
Location: Fearing and loathing in Delaware and Virginia.

the headline no campaign wants to see....

Post by callmeslick »

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/ ... li=BBnb7Kz


that should blow the food budget. Of course, the money will be spent on Trump Steaks, Trump Doughnuts, etc
Pudfark wrote: Mon May 29, 2017 11:15 am I live in Texas....you live in America.
HappyHappy

Re: the headline no campaign wants to see....

Post by HappyHappy »

Quoting MSN again, you really are STUPID.
Pudfark

Re: the headline no campaign wants to see....

Post by Pudfark »

"Ya can't fix stupid" ;)
HappyHappy

Re: the headline no campaign wants to see....

Post by HappyHappy »

If the name has MS in it, then it's Left Wing Communist propaganda.
User avatar
Darkhorse
Posts: 555
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2009 12:32 am

Re: the headline no campaign wants to see....

Post by Darkhorse »

So what is the difference between this and Obama being tied in with Ayers and Wright? It just looks like more hypocrisy to me!
Now we have demonstrable evidence that if you try to lead from behind, eventually the guys up front will stop looking back for instructions.
Government-coerced expression is a feature of dictatorships that has no place in a free country
Pudfark

Re: the headline no campaign wants to see....

Post by Pudfark »

Darkhorse wrote:So what is the difference between this and Obama being tied in with Ayers and Wright? It just looks like more hypocrisy to me!
It is. :) As you pointed out, one is a convicted commie bomber anarchist and the other is a loud mouth racist anarchist. I see your point. 8-)
User avatar
callmeslick
Posts: 16473
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:02 pm
Location: Fearing and loathing in Delaware and Virginia.

Re: the headline no campaign wants to see....

Post by callmeslick »

Darkhorse wrote:So what is the difference between this and Obama being tied in with Ayers and Wright? It just looks like more hypocrisy to me!
could you explain how a link to a politician(Chris Christie) who publicly endorsed Trump equates to the made-up smear campaign around supposed 'close ties' with Ayers and Wright, neither of whom campaigned for Obama? I'm missing your equivalency, DH?
Pudfark wrote: Mon May 29, 2017 11:15 am I live in Texas....you live in America.
User avatar
Darkhorse
Posts: 555
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2009 12:32 am

Re: the headline no campaign wants to see....

Post by Darkhorse »

The so called "made-up smear campaign" is just spin to whitewash your side of the coin to make it look better than the other side when both sides are equally fucked up! The Dems and Repubs are heading for the same place just taking different roads, you boneheads are fighting each other while they are laughing all the way to the bank with your money!
Now we have demonstrable evidence that if you try to lead from behind, eventually the guys up front will stop looking back for instructions.
Government-coerced expression is a feature of dictatorships that has no place in a free country
User avatar
callmeslick
Posts: 16473
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:02 pm
Location: Fearing and loathing in Delaware and Virginia.

Re: the headline no campaign wants to see....

Post by callmeslick »

as you know, DH, Hillary was hardly MY first choice. However, the Republican party, or more accurately, the segment behind Trump, are dangerous to the safety and stability of the nation. I'm not, as you might recall, prone to saying that about folks I merely disagree with. Didn't say so here about Romney, I DID suggest the same of Palin. Didn't call Bush such a danger, noting that we'd survived worse Presidents. And, so on. The choice here is stark, DH, and it isn't a case of arguing while some sinister machine continues unabated, either. It is a battle for whether we wish to represent our nation to the world as scared, angry and mean-spirited, or whether we wish to remain uniquely American: pluralistic, erring to the side of freedom over xenophobia, and conducting ourselves in a restrained and consistent manner on the world stage. Sadly, the GOP has made the choice of Hillary Clinton obvious. That might be sad, but will have to do........like I said about Bush........
Pudfark wrote: Mon May 29, 2017 11:15 am I live in Texas....you live in America.
Pudfark

Re: the headline no campaign wants to see....

Post by Pudfark »

callmeslick wrote:as you know, DH, Hillary was hardly MY first choice. However, the Republican party, or more accurately, the segment behind Trump, are dangerous to the safety and stability of the nation. I'm not, as you might recall, prone to saying that about folks I merely disagree with. Didn't say so here about Romney, I DID suggest the same of Palin. Didn't call Bush such a danger, noting that we'd survived worse Presidents. And, so on. The choice here is stark, DH, and it isn't a case of arguing while some sinister machine continues unabated, either. It is a battle for whether we wish to represent our nation to the world as scared, angry and mean-spirited, or whether we wish to remain uniquely American: pluralistic, erring to the side of freedom over xenophobia, and conducting ourselves in a restrained and consistent manner on the world stage. Sadly, the GOP has made the choice of Hillary Clinton obvious. That might be sad, but will have to do........like I said about Bush........
Pure horseshit and drivel. To wit: When you start believing that it's more important what the neighbors think....than what yer wife and children think...you're truly a fucktard and need to go live with the neighbors.
Post Reply